Posted on 07/12/2009 12:06:51 PM PDT by NoobRep
Tomorrow could be interesting.
I am guessing that is NOT the case with Orly.
So do Obama's lawyers show up tomorrow and try to get the default judgment overturned? My experience is that it's really tough to have happen. What if Obama's attorneys don't appear? Does a warrant go out for his arrest? We're headed into unfamiliar territory, that's for sure.
This isn’t just going away, obviously.
What if it’s still an open, festering sore in 11/12. Will the press touch it by then?
Default judgements are very easily & regularly set aside. This is a civil, not a criminal matter. The law mandates everyone get their day in court, thus judges are loathe to uphold default judgements. They could issue sanctions, if court rules so allow if the defendant has intentionally wasted court or plaintiff’s time & money.
Don’t bet the farm on a default in a civil case. That is rarely dispositive in any case.
This will be interesting to see what if anything happens. However, I’m not going to hold my breath that the courts would actually do the right thing.
“All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.” I don’t think Obama’s default penalties will be anything like yours or mine would be.
Here’s the calendar for Judge Carter tomorrow. Obama is listed on page 6.
Can someone with legalese (sp) explain? The Judge appeared to be giving Obama one last chance to respond or else he’ll be in default. Here is judge Carter’s bio:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_O._Carter
I’ll tell you what will happen.
The media will ignore it.
The press will focus on “Bush crimes”.
There will be some obscure report that shows Burlington, New Hampshire’s consumer confidence shows a 5% increase over last weekend and it will be “proof” of a “green shoot.
Joe Biden will spew some crap about a shovel ready project getting underway in New Orleans.
Some Michael Jackson “revelation” will come to light.
And the idiotic antics of Hussein will continue.
He could become unemployed!
What will happen?
Nothing of any substance.
AND! Nothing will change.
This whole BC flap is a big moneymaker and attention getter for the conspiracy theorists. No way they’re letting it go.
How can you be so cynical?/s
This is a Country of laws /sarc
If the judge does anything but dismiss this, I will be very surprised. Using the kind of analysis that has made ‘no standing’ famous, the judge can use the technicality that the Justice Department is not Obama personally, and anyway, at that point in time (?) he was not President so it did not represent him, and on, and on, and on.
“Case closed - go away Orly et al” (and don’t noone ask who al is!!)
If the hamburg doesn't calm things down, maybe we can return to Michelle's garden and watch the EPA take new lead tests for the coming lawsuits by the gardening kids and their families.
Obviously this won’t do any good now, but it may be helpful if the guy plans to run for a 3rd term.
...I meant second term, of course.
Exactly, thats how they operate with PRAVDA leading the way for them. I tell you they are the party of distraction.
6. SA CV09-0082-DOC(ANx) ALAN KEYES, PH.D., ET. AL., -VBARACK
H. OBAMA, ET. AL.,
MOTION BY PLAINTIFFS FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO CERTIFY QUESTION FOR APPEAL
Orly Taitz
Looks like a re hearing on an Order to Show Cause (OSC) request filed by plaintiffs. The OSC is kind of a generic way of getting procedural issues in front of the judge. Sounds like it was denied the first time & plaintiffs are now seeking reconsideration or the right to take it up to the higher court.
This is not going to be a hearing on the merits of the bc matter, just procedural stuff. Happens all the time especially when one party has the resources to waste the other side’s money by balking at every request & forcing the other side into court. The OSC is the typical vehicle, it’s basically saying: Mr. Defendant please explain to us why you should not be compelled to . . . (fill in the blank, produce a document, answer interrogatories, etc).
Obama has a set of ears as big as CAB DOORS on a New York taxi! That’s what the Aussies say about him, in addition to other things that could get me banned from this site.
Someone should stand outside the court with a sign that says: “Crucify him! Crucify him!”
The question is, has the Obama Gang had enough time to counterfit a phony birth certificate and artificially age it to get away with it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.