Posted on 07/10/2009 3:31:52 AM PDT by Red Steel
California attorney Orly Taitz, who has pursued multiple legal challenges to Barack Obama's eligibility to be the president, is attracting some high-level attention, with the Justice Department trying to add itself onto one of her cases and the legal counsel for the Joint Chiefs of Staff being assigned to review another issue.
Taitz has filed multiple legal actions around the country alleging Obama does not meet the constitutional requirements to occupy the Oval Office. One of her cases, filed against Obama as an individual for actions before he took office, is scheduled for a hearing in a California court on Monday.
The hearing is on a request by Taitz for a default judgment, since she explains she notified the president of the action weeks ago, and his lawyers failed to respond.
Taitz has told WND if her motion is granted she will immediately request access to Obama's birth records and other documentation that could determine his eligibility to occupy the Oval Office.
Taitz has been trying multiple additional notification procedures since U.S. District Judge David O. Carter ruled: "Before the court is a motion by plaintiffs for reconsideration of order to show cause or in the alternative to certify question for appeal. Court sets this matter for hearing on July 13, 2009 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 9D. Plaintiffs are directed to make every effort possible to ensure that all remaining defendants are aware of the hearing and provide documentation that the individual receiving service is authorized to accept on defendants' behalf."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Doesn't mean she'll be the one to reveal it.
Given the fate of all the suits she and others have filed, I'd say probability is against her.
PING!
Excerpt- “........ with the Justice Department trying to add itself onto one of her cases and the legal counsel for the Joint Chiefs of Staff being assigned to review another issue.”
I’m sure that the KGB, MOSSAD, the British SIS and our own CIA/FBI know much about Hussein.
I got a first-hand look at just how deep this thing of ignoring the issue by the MSM goes. My son, 45-years-old and overall conservative, and I were discussing Obama and how much damage he is doing and potentially could do to our nation. I pointed out that the issue of his eligibility could be the saving grace for us. My son had not heard of the controversy! I was shocked. He listens to all sorts of news and is really pretty up to date for a person his age.
Has anyone contacted the medical board in Hawaii that licenses MDs in order to determine the identities of practicing, certified OB docs in 1961 (or whenever Obama was born)? Also, since 2 hospitals have been named as Obama’s birthplace, those hospitals should have in their records all OB docs who had privileges in 1961. That is not a HIPAA concern, BTW, and I bet only a handful of doctors could have delivered Obama.
Has anyone requested from the Hawaii medical board a list of all practicing, board-certified OB docs in 1961? Also, both hospitals where Obama claims he was born should have in their records the names of OB docs who had privileges to practice there. This is not a HIPAA issue and I bet only a handful of MDs could have delivered him.
Berg also thought that, when BO and the DNC’s failed to respond to his charges, it was an “Admission” of them and that he was going to see Barry’s records.
It never happened.
....yawn....this is going..no...where!
Try the MegaMillions. You have better odds.
Plaintiffs’ Motion Is Without Merit And Should Be Denied Forthwith
As the foregoing discussion demonstrates, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration is without merit factually, legally or logically, and it should be denied forthwith. Morever, the questions presented by the Motion are so frivolous and insubstantial that they do not merit an interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/17185121/Statement-of-Interest-Keyes-v-Obama?autodown=pdf
The Obamamessiah was born in a manger, not some stinkin' hospital. /s
As a prosecutor, Carter was the initial prosecutor and filed charges in the case of serial killer William Bonin, also known as “The Freeway Killer,” who became the first person executed by lethal injection in California in 1996.
Between 2000 and 2001, Carter presided over the longest criminal trial in the history of the Central District of California. This case involved the prosecution of more than forty alleged members of the Mexican Mafia on charges of murder, attempted murder, conspiracy to murder, extortion, etc.
I don't think Judge Carter will be intimidated like other judges have been by Obama. He's 65 and probably won't move up the judicial food chain. If he smells corruption, he'll likely bite.
Judge Carter will probably reason: what wrong with subpoenaing college transcripts and birth certificate records? Wouldn't the President like to dismiss these claims, once and for all?
Obama's Justice Dept lawyers haven't put forth Privacy or Executive Privilege as a reason to deny records -- just the old "frivolous and insubstantial" argument. Furthermore, I don't think this judge is going to accept the US Attorneys' plea of Interlocutory orders (§1292 -- Interlocutory decisions) -- Judge Carter has discretion if he chooses to exercise it.
Something that should be understood is that the second job and maybe the first job of the attorney general is to protect the president.
Orly Taitz is now and for the future need prayer.
I like Unicorns. What is the next step, so I can get one?
Maybe she should also specify damages. I could use a little extra cash.
Obama's fight the smears site, what happened to it?
If it is no longer on the web, where are to go to see Obama's Hawaii "birth certificate?"
Note: I bet Obama's people are scared to death of technically skilled people like Polarik, because they know that once Polarik gets his hands on an Obama Hawaii birth certificate or on Obama's college records, Obama will be in a lot of trouble politically.
Do the Joint Chiefs have ‘standing’?
Per Article 2, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, one must be a natural born citizen to hold office as President.
The Obama camp has now taken down Obama’s suspicious COLB document from their site, action must be taken further to investigate and enforce laws that have been violated.
Right on!
You wrote-
“Obama’s fight the smears site, what happened to it?
If it is no longer on the web, where are to go to see Obama’s Hawaii “birth certificate?”
Note: I bet Obama’s people are scared to death of technically skilled people like Polarik, because they know that once Polarik gets his hands on an Obama Hawaii birth certificate or on Obama’s college records, Obama will be in a lot of trouble politically.”
Hey BP2; Outstanding presentation!!
You wrote- “The judge presiding over Orly’s case, Judge Carter, is a former marine and seen as many as a “straight shooter”. He began his legal career as an Assistant District Attorney with the Orange County District Attorney’s Office in 1972, where he became the senior deputy district attorney in charge of the office’s homicide division.
As a prosecutor, Carter was the initial prosecutor and filed charges in the case of serial killer William Bonin, also known as “The Freeway Killer,” who became the first person executed by lethal injection in California in 1996.
Between 2000 and 2001, Carter presided over the longest criminal trial in the history of the Central District of California. This case involved the prosecution of more than forty alleged members of the Mexican Mafia on charges of murder, attempted murder, conspiracy to murder, extortion, etc.
I don’t think Judge Carter will be intimidated like other judges have been by Obama. He’s 65 and probably won’t move up the judicial food chain. If he smells corruption, he’ll likely bite.
Judge Carter will probably reason: what wrong with subpoenaing college transcripts and birth certificate records? Wouldn’t the President like to dismiss these claims, once and for all?
Obama’s Justice Dept lawyers haven’t put forth Privacy or Executive Privilege as a reason to deny records — just the old “frivolous and insubstantial” argument. Furthermore, I don’t think this judge is going to accept the US Attorneys’ plea of Interlocutory orders (§1292 — Interlocutory decisions) — Judge Carter has discretion if he chooses to exercise it.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.