Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mr. Obama, show us your birth certificate! (Wow! Pat Boone goes Obama hunting!)
WND ^ | 6/26/09 | Pat Boone

Posted on 06/26/2009 10:55:57 PM PDT by pissant

I fly a lot. It's gotten to be such a hassle that I'm cutting down on my air travel, and even turning down a number of engagements because I just don't want to go through the ordeal at the airports.

What ordeal? If you ask that question, you must not have flown anywhere since 9/11. I'm talking about the security gauntlet every passenger has to go through!

If you have flown anywhere, you've had to get in the lines. Take off every bit of metal bigger than a dime, your jacket, hat and shoes, perhaps your belt … and, if you have a computer, put it in a separate tray, hoping for a reunion after you pass your body through a powerful scanner. If you have a metal knee or hip replacement or a pacemaker, you'll probably have to go through a separate line and submit to a "wand scan" and even a hands-on "pat down." It can be quite humiliating, and the process can even cause you to miss your plane, after all that.

If you've checked into a hotel lately, you know you always have to produce your driver's license or valid photo identification. Same if you want to rent a car . When you shop at Costco, for Pete's sake, you have to prove you're who you are and that you're a credentialed Costco shopper with a valid credit card (which they'll verify on the spot) just to get in the door.

When you get gas – if you can still afford it to – and you want to use your credit card, you pass it into a slot checker, and still have to punch in your zip code. Right? In today's world, you have to be ready to show valid, verifiable identification for almost

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birthers; boone; certifigate; citizenship; colb; eligibility; hawaii; indonesia; ineligible; kenya; larrysinclairslover; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamanoncitizenissue; onoiwont; patboone; usurper; wingnutdaily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 241-250 next last
To: Fudd Fan

Ask and I shall seek to comply specifically.


161 posted on 06/27/2009 10:59:31 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
...or if the sight got overwhelmed and took it down?

Or maybe eBay took it down because it was a fraud? Ever think of that?

162 posted on 06/27/2009 11:01:15 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

hen Jindal can’t be President either
_________________
good! He will never win the election. Please, no Jindahl


163 posted on 06/27/2009 11:02:33 AM PDT by mojitojoe (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

I agree 100% but if a non binding resolution is all we have to start with, it should be more than enough to jump start this mess.

Also there is this law from the first congress session 2 chapter 4 of 1790 which states:

“the children of citizens of the United States, that may have been born beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as NATURAL BORN CITIZENS: Provided also That no person heretofore proscribed by any state, shall be admitted a citizen as aforesaid, except by an act of the legislature of the state in which such person was proscribed.”

March 26, 1790


164 posted on 06/27/2009 11:04:45 AM PDT by Munz ("We're all here for you OK? It's a circle of love" Rham Emanuel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Munz

“....but can anyone please tell me what the enforcement is on this??

None. It will not stand in a court of law. This is something akin to the mock trials conducted by students and debaters.
It might attract a good bit of attention though. I’m not sure at this point if that is good or bad. We are already being described as nuts because so many have jumped on this for publicity or solicitation of funds using rumors and/or false claims.
Guess we’ll see how it goes.


165 posted on 06/27/2009 11:05:17 AM PDT by MestaMachine (Evil exists, but cannot act without willing participants. Obama participates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

a coup has been carried out
_____________
Indeed it has. I keep saying it, nobody believes it.

contraire .... I do


166 posted on 06/27/2009 11:06:08 AM PDT by Munz ("We're all here for you OK? It's a circle of love" Rham Emanuel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Munz
They even agreed to that during McCains eligibility hearings. look it up.

Nope. McCaskill authored bill to declare McCain qualified.

The bill never passed as a law, only as a "sense of the senate". The question is still open.

167 posted on 06/27/2009 11:08:50 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 159 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Munz

The basis of power is rooted in the Fifth Amendment. The Supreme Court has addressed its validity. Leo Donofrio calls it the Grand Jury theFourth Branch of Government. I don’t have all the answers to your questions, but I will continue to search.

From the web site:
http://americangrandjury.org/history_power.html
The Constitution of the United States, as interpreted by the Supreme Court, gives rise to a FOURTH BRANCH of Government, THE GRAND JURY. We the people have been charged with oversight of the government in our roles as grand jurors.

And at this critical time in American history, we must, for the protection of our constitutional republic, take back our power and start acting as powerful as the other branches of government.

The law is on our side. So please spread this knowledge as far and wide as you can. We the people have the right and power under the 5th Amendment of the Constitution to charge this government with crimes by returning presentments regardless of whether the US Attorneys or the federal judges agree with us. As the Supreme Court has so brilliantly stated, we are the “buffer between the Government and the people.”


168 posted on 06/27/2009 11:10:05 AM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

So who then? No Jindal, no Sanford...Palin probably can’t win either...


169 posted on 06/27/2009 11:12:23 AM PDT by RockinRight (Obama: Math is hard, so we just make sh-t up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Munz
I agree 100% but if a non binding resolution is all we have to start with, it should be more than enough to jump start this mess.

Except S.Res.511 didn't claim to define natural born citizen under all circumstances. It just said that under the laws in place at the time, the conditions of McCain's birth made him a natural born citizen.

So if the Senate passed a non-binding resolution stating that Obama was a natural born citizen would you accept that?

170 posted on 06/27/2009 11:12:27 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Munz
Also there is this law from the first congress session 2 chapter 4 of 1790 which states...

Which was superseded by another law in 1795...and dozens of times since.

171 posted on 06/27/2009 11:13:41 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
That was my first thought,
but then, the more I thought about it, the more it appears to be a real certificate.

I'm thinking that there's a FEAR FACTOR driving these very unusual events.
If it was fake, Obama himself would have released the 'long form'.
I can only guess.

If it IS REAL, then there's all sorts of litigation that could come out of it.

172 posted on 06/27/2009 11:17:00 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Munz; LucyT; BP2; Beckwith; mojitojoe; Polarik
"If they just follow their own rules then Obama is not qualified." I'm sorry, I cannot agree. The democrats have a history of lying and layering another lie on top of a lie to change direction without being held to the first lie.

If one were pushing the issue of the Senate amending the meaning of the Constitution illegitimately, the Senate (and Leahy is always capable of another flip or flop) can merely stated that McCain was not elected so it is irrelevant re Obama's eligibility.

Democrats rule by 'consensus of the enemedia herded sheeple', so it is the court of public opinion to which they will appeal for ignoring their previous mistake. They would follow that with the bigger lie that 'the people have spoken and elected Obama, thus the will of the people is to be enforced.'

The criminal work of the democrat senate was to fabrciate a smoke screen behind which thier affirmative action fraud could be promoted to pres__ent without being challenged the way democrats challenged McCain.

Did you happen to notice that the Senate resoultion contained a well placed lie? ... McCain was born in a Colon hospital then brought to the Naval base. Has it ever occurred to you that this little 'error' was needed to open the door for Barry being born in Kenya or Canada then registered in Hawaii? {From text of the resouliton: Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936 ... ]

173 posted on 06/27/2009 11:21:15 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: null and void

>>Nope. McCaskill authored bill to declare McCain qualified.

The bill never passed as a law, only as a “sense of the senate”. The question is still open.<<

Check S.RES.511
4/30/2008 Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.

does that not mean that it was passed and agreed to?


174 posted on 06/27/2009 11:24:11 AM PDT by Munz ("We're all here for you OK? It's a circle of love" Rham Emanuel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Hi Null, hope all is well. I just had a flashback to a conversation we had in Oct. concerning this issue. It was then that i had what alcoholics refer to as a “moment of clarity” and totally lost my faith in the system. Still quite disillusioned but now ready to tear the aforementioned system down so that we can then rebuild. “For there to be a new beginning, something has to come to an end”....Apocolypto.


175 posted on 06/27/2009 11:25:29 AM PDT by JerseyDvl (Since they call Bush, "Dubya" then I must insist on calling Barry, "Hussein" *2009=1984 on steroids*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: null and void

SUMMARY AS OF: 4/30/2008—Passed Senate without amendment. (There are 2 other summaries)

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

States that John Sidney McCain, III, is a “natural born Citizen’’ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.


176 posted on 06/27/2009 11:27:07 AM PDT by Munz ("We're all here for you OK? It's a circle of love" Rham Emanuel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

>>Which was superseded by another law in 1795...and dozens of times since.<<

can you find that citation for me please?
i am really trying to get a grip on this


177 posted on 06/27/2009 11:29:17 AM PDT by Munz ("We're all here for you OK? It's a circle of love" Rham Emanuel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
I too believe being born on Mars of two American citizen parents would still be equal to natural born citizen.

I disagree. I believe that in order to qualify as a Natural Born Citizen for the purposes of holding the Office of the President, one must both be a citizen by ancestry (Jus Sanguinus) and by place of birth (Jus Soli)

BUT THIS IS NOT MY VENUE NOR THE SENATE’s, it is solely the venue of the SCOTUS to interpret the Constitution and in this case based upon the historic meaning of the term ‘natural born citizen’

Absolutely correct.

But by the time it gets to the Supremes, I fear a majority of the court will be 0bama appointees who will rule in favor of their master. *sigh*

178 posted on 06/27/2009 11:29:18 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 159 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: pissant
You can bet Mossad has the goods on BO. They probably have his Kenyan Birth Certificate and will use it at just the right time.
179 posted on 06/27/2009 11:30:00 AM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

>> Except S.Res.511 didn’t claim to define natural born citizen under all circumstances. It just said that under the laws in place at the time, the conditions of McCain’s birth made him a natural born citizen.

So if the Senate passed a non-binding resolution stating that Obama was a natural born citizen would you accept that?<<

it did not need to define under all circumstances. It clearly states in the debate that because he was born of TWO us Citizens that he was eligible.

If the senate has an open hearing at this point and a fair one, but it would haveto go as McCains did and be approved as Mccains was.


180 posted on 06/27/2009 11:32:10 AM PDT by Munz ("We're all here for you OK? It's a circle of love" Rham Emanuel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 241-250 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson