Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur

>> Except S.Res.511 didn’t claim to define natural born citizen under all circumstances. It just said that under the laws in place at the time, the conditions of McCain’s birth made him a natural born citizen.

So if the Senate passed a non-binding resolution stating that Obama was a natural born citizen would you accept that?<<

it did not need to define under all circumstances. It clearly states in the debate that because he was born of TWO us Citizens that he was eligible.

If the senate has an open hearing at this point and a fair one, but it would haveto go as McCains did and be approved as Mccains was.


180 posted on 06/27/2009 11:32:10 AM PDT by Munz ("We're all here for you OK? It's a circle of love" Rham Emanuel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]


To: Munz

The point to ponder is, Leahy’s little ploy used ‘two’ for McCain and would not be voided if they truned around and stated ‘one’ for Obama. They do not have the Constitutional authority to amend the Constitution of sit in judgment for interpretation of same!


188 posted on 06/27/2009 12:05:37 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]

To: Munz
it did not need to define under all circumstances. It clearly states in the debate that because he was born of TWO us Citizens that he was eligible.

Read the language of the resolution. There's an error in it - McCain wasn't born on a military base. So does that invalidate the resolution and make him ineligible?

197 posted on 06/27/2009 2:26:27 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson