Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Women over 30 who exercise more than an hour a week reduce risk of breast cancer
Telegraph (U.K.) ^ | June 6, 2009

Posted on 06/05/2009 10:51:26 PM PDT by Schnucki

A group of 4296 women were asked to recall their physical activity levels during four key stages of life: 10 to 15 years old, 15 to 30 years old, 30 to 50 years old, and 50 years old and older.

The odds of developing breast cancer did not appear to change in relation to exercise levels between ages 10 and 30, but women above age 30 significantly cut their chances of developing breast cancer if they were more active, the researchers found.

The study was led by Lisa Sprod of University of Northern Colorado in Greeley and presented at the American College of Sports Medicine's annual meeting in Seattle.

"An average amount of exercise was defined as 60 minutes per week," Miss Sprod said. "so anyone exercising less than 60 minutes was below average, above 60 minutes was above average, and anyone that considered themselves 'highly competitive' chose that category."

Fewer women who classified themselves as "highly competitive" between the ages of 30 and 50 developed breast cancer, compared to women who were less physically active.

Likewise, fewer women who classified themselves as highly competitive at age 50 or older developed breast cancer when compared to women who exercised less than 60 minutes per week.

"Preliminarily," Sprod said, "the take home message is that accumulating greater physical activity after the age of 30 may play a role in reducing the risk of developing breast cancer."

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: cancer; exercise; health; women

1 posted on 06/05/2009 10:51:26 PM PDT by Schnucki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

Thanks for posting.


2 posted on 06/05/2009 10:57:28 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

Pregnancy, abortion, genetics, and birth control have a bigger impact


3 posted on 06/05/2009 11:07:13 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

More fat=more estrogen=more breast cancer.


4 posted on 06/05/2009 11:07:57 PM PDT by conservative cat (America, you have been PWNED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

I think having a buttload of extra fat on your carcass has an impact as well.


5 posted on 06/05/2009 11:41:02 PM PDT by Lizavetta (Politicians: When they're not lying, they're stealing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

Enough already. Breast cancer happens. It even happens to men. I know...


6 posted on 06/05/2009 11:41:29 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon (I don't trust Obama with my country. Do you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

They probably exercise more than an hour a week because they are healthier.

Or, they are healthier because they exercise more than an hour a week.

Either way, if they are healthier, of course breast cancer will be less of a problem.


7 posted on 06/05/2009 11:47:31 PM PDT by Marie2 (The second mouse gets the cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

Man to not exercise more than 1 hour a week you really have to be lazy.


8 posted on 06/05/2009 11:50:39 PM PDT by exist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki

One day exercise is good for you. The next day it isn’t. I wish they would make their minds up.


9 posted on 06/05/2009 11:56:56 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Schnucki
Women over 30 who exercise more than an hour a week reduce risk of breast cancer

And have tighter buns.

10 posted on 06/06/2009 12:07:59 AM PDT by TigersEye (Cloward-Piven Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

My sister had breast cancer and of all of us (4 daughters in our family) she was the one who was the most health concious. Everyday at the gym, eating organic foods, special trainer, very strict diet and trim.

She met none of the risk factors. We had no family history. She had had 6 kids. Never been on birth control or hormones. Does she regret having a healthy lifestyle? No. But it sure didn’t help her in the cancer prevention realm. It just proved to me that control is an illusion.


11 posted on 06/06/2009 1:52:01 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dawn53

Some people who never smoked a cigarette in their lives develop lung cancer. However, these are the more exceptional cases, not the norm. Nature can be cruel.

However, a woman who has lots of kids, exercises, eats a good diet and deals with stress properly has a much less chance fo developing breast cancer than a fat career woman with no kids who doesn’t exercise.


12 posted on 06/06/2009 3:49:55 AM PDT by Bushwacker777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dawn53

did she breast feed?


13 posted on 06/06/2009 9:52:20 AM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: conservative cat

“More fat=more estrogen=more breast cancer.”

Most people don’t know that fat produces estrogen. To add to the problems overweight women also usually have too much belly fat which causes an overload of testosterone. That ups the cancer risk even more.


14 posted on 06/06/2009 10:01:18 AM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Varda

belly fat causes testosterone?

Can you elaborate on that, or provide a link? I’ve never heard of this. I knew about fat that produces estrogen. I read once that extremely large women that lose their ovaries from cancer or other problems can get by without hormone treatments because their body fat makes up for the loss of estrogen.


15 posted on 06/06/2009 10:37:23 AM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
I found this out when looking for information on metabolic syndrome. SCAT (subcutaneous adipose tissue) is the one that produces estrogen but VAT (visceral adipose tissue) does the opposite. I've also read that SCAT around the midsection of women behaves more like VAT so that doesn't help either.

"VAT obesity in women is associated with elevated levels of total testosterone, free testosterone., and SHBG [92]." link

" High endogenous testosterone is associated with increased breast cancer (BC) risk" link

16 posted on 06/06/2009 10:53:02 AM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Varda

Ok. And visceral fat is the same thing as brown fat?


17 posted on 06/06/2009 10:57:00 AM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

Not that I can tell. Isn’t brown fat the type that babies have?


18 posted on 06/06/2009 11:03:12 AM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Varda

Brown fat is the fat that is attached to some of your internal organs and it excels at generating body heat...iirc.


19 posted on 06/06/2009 11:05:41 AM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
That sounds like good fat. VAT is definitely bad. It's heavily associated with diabetes, heart problems, blood pressure problems and the like but on the good side no doubt it will keep you warm until it kills you.
20 posted on 06/06/2009 11:12:28 AM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson