Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Accused Arkansas Military Center Shooter Had Prior Weapons Arrest
Ap via Foxnews.com ^ | 06/04/09 | Unattributed

Posted on 06/04/2009 12:50:01 PM PDT by Big_Monkey

CONWAY, Ark. — A Muslim convert accused of fatally shooting an Army private and wounding another had previously been arrested on a weapons charge in Tennessee, but that charge eventually was dropped.

Police say Abdulhakim Muhammad, then known as Carlos Bledsoe, was arrested in February 2004 after a traffic stop in Nashville.

He was found with an SKS rifle inside in the car, with five rounds in a clip and one round in the rifle's chamber. Officers also found a sawed-off shotgun and another shotgun inside the car, as well as an ounce of marijuana, a switchblade knife and two shotgun shells on Muhammad.

Muhammad is accused of killing Army Pvt. William Andrew Long and wounding Pvt. Quinton I. Ezeagwula in a shooting Monday at a Little Rock recruiting center. After the attack, police confiscated from Muhammad's truck an SKS rifle believed to be used in the shootings.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; US: Arkansas; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: ar; army; banglist; bledsoe; recruiter; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
This was in part a failure to enforce existing gun laws. This should put a damper on calls for additional regulations because of this murderous terrorist.
1 posted on 06/04/2009 12:50:02 PM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

more info on the terrorist on this thread


2 posted on 06/04/2009 12:51:40 PM PDT by JoyjoyfromNJ (Psalm 121)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big_Monkey

When guns are outlawed only outlaws will own guns.


3 posted on 06/04/2009 12:52:59 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is Brewing!! Tea Party Express/Taxpayer March on DC 09.12.09!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big_Monkey

The original reports I read said the killer had an assault weapon. None of the weapons listed in this article is an assault weapon.


4 posted on 06/04/2009 12:55:24 PM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big_Monkey

What the hell!!! This guy has a round in the chamber and a lot of other weapons on his possession? Why were the charges dropped? I really smell a rat here. Or a friend of obama.


5 posted on 06/04/2009 12:55:52 PM PDT by Texas resident (Texan by birth and by choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas resident; Big_Monkey

The article also said that he planned to sell the weapons to some other man who was in the car (but ran away and wasn’t caught). That’s not a crime?

I suspect that if an older white guy had been arrested with these things, particularly planning to sell them to somebody else, believe me, he’d still be in jail.


6 posted on 06/04/2009 1:02:15 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Texas resident
What the hell!!! This guy has a round in the chamber and a lot of other weapons on his possession?...

Including a sawed off shotgun!

7 posted on 06/04/2009 1:05:12 PM PDT by LRS (Just contracts; just laws; just a constitution...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: WayneS
"None of the weapons listed in this article is an assault weapon.

This is about a prior arrest the terrorist had in 2004. While none of the weapons listed are assault weapons (whatever that may be), one may be illegal if under Federal law if it was sawed-off under 18" for the barrel or 26"(ish) overall.

Plus, this guy had marijuana on his possession. They don't have any good reason why he wasn't prosecuted.

8 posted on 06/04/2009 1:07:34 PM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Big_Monkey

Oops. Sorry. I missed that. I thought they were describing the weapons he had with him when he was arrested for the murder.


9 posted on 06/04/2009 1:12:11 PM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Big_Monkey

Probably for the same reason they let the Black panthers walk who violeted people’s rights by threatening them at a polling station.


10 posted on 06/04/2009 1:13:42 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS
The original reports I read said the killer had an assault weapon. None of the weapons listed in this article is an assault weapon.

He did his attack with an SKS. That is what they are calling an assault weapon.
11 posted on 06/04/2009 1:14:30 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ

Oh. Mine’s no more “deadly” than any other .30 caliber semi-automatic rifle, and less “deadly” than some. I wonder why it is considered an “assult weapon”


12 posted on 06/04/2009 1:16:39 PM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Big_Monkey
Plus, this guy had marijuana on his possession.

Damn pot possessor. If they had just executed him back then, nothing bad would have happened. Right?

13 posted on 06/04/2009 1:28:20 PM PDT by AH_LiveRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AH_LiveRight
"Damn pot possessor. If they had just executed him back then, nothing bad would have happened. Right?

Well, considering that he probably shot these two soldiers with a weapon that should have been confiscated as a result of the conviction that they would have surely gotten had they pursued the charges, maybe this two young men would be alive.

I'm not sure where you live, but where I live it's people are usually up to no good when they have weapons, illegal loaded and secured while in possession of illegal drugs when operating a motor vehicle. It sounds like you think that's fine. Let me know how that works out in your neighborhood. I'll take a pass for my neighborhood.

You want to smoke weed. Great. But keep it out of your car and keep it away from your loaded weapons.

14 posted on 06/04/2009 1:37:40 PM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Big_Monkey
Someone has to tell me why the Feds didn't step in on the sawed off shotgun. I thought that it was mandatory jail time.
15 posted on 06/04/2009 1:39:57 PM PDT by Recon Dad (Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - MARSOC DAD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AH_LiveRight

Plus, this guy had marijuana on his possession.

Damn pot possessor. If they had just executed him back then, nothing bad would have happened. Right?

Actually, I believe the point is that possession of marijuana, in addition to possible weapons violations (I don’t know the law in Tennessee) made the lack of arrest/charges inexplicable. Why don’t you just fire one up and become comatose again.


16 posted on 06/04/2009 1:42:45 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad
Someone has to tell me why the Feds didn't step in on the sawed off shotgun. I thought that it was mandatory jail time.

For a white guy it is. 10 years in the pen.

17 posted on 06/04/2009 1:44:23 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (Out of gas become a pill box, Out of ammo become a bunker, Out of hope become a hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad
"Someone has to tell me why the Feds didn't step in on the sawed off shotgun. I thought that it was mandatory jail time."

No one probably told them.

60 Minutes, of all places, did a story last year about the DC gun laws. It was surprisingly balanced. They pointed out how restrictive the laws are, keeping law-abiding citizens from having handguns in their own homes.

They also illustrated quite effectively how many gang-bangers are arrested on very legitimate weapons charges, but have the charges eventually dropped because the DC courts are just too overburnded.

In fact, 60 minutes points out that many times these gangbangers actually get their weapons back.

If they would have prosecuted this murderer, in not a foregone conclusion that he wouldn't have murdered. But, he probably wouldn't have been allowed to travel out of the country, so who really knows what path his life would have taken.

18 posted on 06/04/2009 1:47:15 PM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Big_Monkey
I live in Texas. I do not smoke dope.
We can, and do, carry “loaded” weapons; and it is not illegal. All weapons are to be treated as loaded.

Obviously this is another call for more “common sense” gun control laws. It looks like the only federal law they might have gotten this POS on was the “sawed off” shotgun. That is still dubious. They make derringers in Waco that chamber a .410 shell, as well as a .45 long colt. Not to mention rat shot loads that can be fired from pistols. And Thompson makes Contender handguns that fire rifle cartridges. Is that a “sawed off” rifle?

So this muzzie (that I contend was being handled and groomed by the feds anyway) should have been prosecuted so that all other Americans should give up their rights? Hogwash.

19 posted on 06/04/2009 1:48:55 PM PDT by AH_LiveRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
Someone has to tell me why the Feds didn't step in on the sawed off shotgun. I thought that it was mandatory jail time.

For a white guy it is. 10 years in the pen.

Well yeah...except if the US Marshalls or BATFE gets there first, then they get to kill your dog and shoot your kids while waiting for Lon Horiuchi to show up to kill your wife and traumatize what remains of your family.

For Black Panthers and such, it's usually a faculty position with an endowed chair in Ofay Opression 101

20 posted on 06/04/2009 1:51:54 PM PDT by Covenantor ("Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson