Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WayneS
"None of the weapons listed in this article is an assault weapon.

This is about a prior arrest the terrorist had in 2004. While none of the weapons listed are assault weapons (whatever that may be), one may be illegal if under Federal law if it was sawed-off under 18" for the barrel or 26"(ish) overall.

Plus, this guy had marijuana on his possession. They don't have any good reason why he wasn't prosecuted.

8 posted on 06/04/2009 1:07:34 PM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Big_Monkey

Oops. Sorry. I missed that. I thought they were describing the weapons he had with him when he was arrested for the murder.


9 posted on 06/04/2009 1:12:11 PM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Big_Monkey
Plus, this guy had marijuana on his possession.

Damn pot possessor. If they had just executed him back then, nothing bad would have happened. Right?

13 posted on 06/04/2009 1:28:20 PM PDT by AH_LiveRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Big_Monkey
Someone has to tell me why the Feds didn't step in on the sawed off shotgun. I thought that it was mandatory jail time.
15 posted on 06/04/2009 1:39:57 PM PDT by Recon Dad (Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - MARSOC DAD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson