Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senators not adverse to gay court nominee
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2009/05/07/Senators-not-adverse-to-gay-court-nominee/UPI-96611241674468/ ^ | May 7, 2008 | UPI.com

Posted on 05/07/2009 3:03:42 PM PDT by leftyontheright

Key Republican senators say they wouldn't be opposed to a homosexual taking Justice David Souter's seat on the U.S. Supreme Court. Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, told The Hill Wednesday he wouldn't consider homosexuality to be "an automatic disqualification."

(Excerpt) Read more at upi.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fdrq; isakson; isaksontruthfile; rino; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

1 posted on 05/07/2009 3:03:43 PM PDT by leftyontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: leftyontheright

Sessions has to go # 2 in pork and No Morals to boot!


2 posted on 05/07/2009 3:04:42 PM PDT by philly-d-kidder ("God governs the affairs of men." Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanGirlRising; eeevil conservative; jusduat; freeangel; tunedin; Naspino; FreedomPoster

IsaksonTruthFile PING


3 posted on 05/07/2009 3:05:01 PM PDT by leftyontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leftyontheright

The descent into an immoral cess pool appears to be accelerating.


4 posted on 05/07/2009 3:06:08 PM PDT by TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed (Yahweh Yahushua Family Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leftyontheright

Doesn’t want to get involved in a cat fight?

Thinks that a flaming queen on the Court would be his or her own reductio ad absurdam?

Somebody putting the squeeze on Sessions? (Past indescretions?)


5 posted on 05/07/2009 3:07:27 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Beat a better path, and the world will build a mousetrap at your door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leftyontheright

I always considered Souter’s seat the “gay seat” anyway.


6 posted on 05/07/2009 3:08:01 PM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leftyontheright

Alright who pulled the handle to the toilet and let these guys express themselves this way. They need to be brought back home and taught the right way to say and do things.


7 posted on 05/07/2009 3:08:26 PM PDT by handy old one (It is unbecoming for young men to utter maxims. Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leftyontheright

The most important qualification for the job should be an understanding that the SCOTUS is not there to invent new constitional rights.

Beyond that, who cares about cares if they’re gay?


8 posted on 05/07/2009 3:09:43 PM PDT by Lou Budvis (Palin/Bachman '12 - The real men of the GOP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

Souter, being a lifelong bachelor, was an inevitable target of probably baseless innuendo and gossip. But if he is, he’s kept it well in the closet.


9 posted on 05/07/2009 3:10:00 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Beat a better path, and the world will build a mousetrap at your door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Lou Budvis

Gay conservatives are basically nonexistent.


11 posted on 05/07/2009 3:10:50 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Beat a better path, and the world will build a mousetrap at your door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: leftyontheright

Is this the same Sessions that was fired as Director of the FBI the day before Vince Foster was rubbed out?


12 posted on 05/07/2009 3:11:25 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Pres__ent Obama's own grandmother says he was born in Kenya. She was there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leftyontheright
The Hill Wednesday he wouldn't consider homosexuality to be "an automatic disqualification.

How about any previous lingerie modeling gigs?

13 posted on 05/07/2009 3:12:13 PM PDT by socal_parrot (I hate to say I told you so, but...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Souter, being a lifelong bachelor, was an inevitable target of probably baseless innuendo and gossip.

Baseless innuendo and gossip is one of my specialities!

14 posted on 05/07/2009 3:15:25 PM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Is this the same Sessions that was fired as Director of the FBI the day before Vince Foster was rubbed out?

No. Senator Sessions has not worked for the FBI.

15 posted on 05/07/2009 3:15:44 PM PDT by Bahbah (v)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: leftyontheright

**Senators not adverse to gay court nominee**

But the people are.

We need some new senators!


16 posted on 05/07/2009 3:16:17 PM PDT by Salvation ( †With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot
How about any previous lingerie modeling gigs?

Dunno. Seems to have done Miss California in.

17 posted on 05/07/2009 3:17:26 PM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Is this the same Sessions that was fired as Director of the FBI the day before Vince Foster was rubbed out?

That was William Sessions...and, wow, I never knew that aspect of the Vince Foster death...that the FBI director was fired the day before.

18 posted on 05/07/2009 3:20:00 PM PDT by Azzurri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

If Obama were as conscientious about dignified appearance as Bill Clinton, he would not dare nominate a flaming queen. That person would be widely regarded as the clown of the Court.


19 posted on 05/07/2009 3:20:08 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Beat a better path, and the world will build a mousetrap at your door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: philly-d-kidder

You don’t like Jeff Sessions?


20 posted on 05/07/2009 3:20:09 PM PDT by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson