Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The truth about homosexuality and the Nazi Party
RenewAmerica.Us ^ | 5/15/08 | Bryan Fischer

Posted on 05/02/2009 6:52:35 AM PDT by ReformationFan

The Interfaith Alliance, a far-left religious advocacy group in Idaho, has accused Scott Lively, a scheduled speaker at this weekend's "Shake the Nation" conference in Boise, of "bearing false witness" and of being "mean-spirited and hurtful."

Lively's crime? In his book, "The Pink Swastika," Lively exposes a secret homosexual activists don't want you to know about Nazi Germany: that although the Nazis did persecute homosexuals, the homosexuals the Nazis persecuted were almost exclusively the effeminate members of the gay community in Germany, and that much of the mistreatment was administered by masculine homosexuals who despised effeminacy in all its forms.

Ludwig Lenz worked at the Sex Research Institute in Berlin, which was destroyed by Hitler's Brown Shirts in 1933 likely because its records, including 40,000 confessions from members of the Nazi Party, would have exposed the sexual perversions of Nazi leadership. Lenz said that "not ten percent of the men who, in 1933, took the fate of Germany into their hands, were sexually normal."

In fact, the Nazi Party began in a gay bar in Munich, and Ernst Roehm, Hitler's right hand in the early days of Nazism, was well-known for his taste in young boys. William Shirer says in his definitive "Rise and Fall of the Third Reich," not only that Roehm was "important in the rise of Hitler," but also "like so many of the early Nazis, (he was) a homosexual."

Hitler eventually had Roehm shot, not because he was a homosexual but because his influence over the Brown Shirts made him a political threat to Hitler's control. The Roehm Purge, or "Night of the Long Knives," was largely implemented by homosexuals.

Hitler's Brown Shirts, the dreaded SA, better known as "Storm Troopers," were the creation of another homosexual, Gerhard Rossbach, and Storm Troopers were almost exclusively homosexual.

(Excerpt) Read more at renewamerica.us ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bookreview; brownshirts; bryanfischer; censoredhistory; ernstroehm; fischer; gaystapo; germany; himmler; history; hitler; homobama; homonazi; homonaziagenda; homonazis; homonazism; homopsychoagenda; homosexualagenda; homosexualnazi; lively; longknives; nationalsocialist; nazi; nazigermany; nightlongknives; pederasthomofascism; perverts; pinkswastika; religiousleft; roehm; scottlively; shirer; stormtroopers; suppressedhistory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...
Amazon: 'Your search "The Pink Swastika" did not match any products.'

Oddly enough, there are at least FOUR editions available on Amazon -- but the left wing fascist larvae working there appear to have blocked them from the search results.

"The Pink Swastika" site:amazon.com
Google

21 posted on 05/02/2009 8:37:03 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan
Hitler's Brown Shirts, the dreaded SA, better known as "Storm Troopers," ,,, Storm Troopers were almost exclusively homosexual.

Since the membership in the SA reached almost 3 million, which is above 10% of the male population of Germany of the age to be Storm Troopers, it is obviously impossible that they were "almost exclusively homosexual".

22 posted on 05/02/2009 8:47:03 AM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Most ordinary people think that all homosexuals are pretty much interchangeable.

Studies have shown?

23 posted on 05/02/2009 8:51:10 AM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson ("Every nation has the government that it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr
Sorry. Himmler had any SS man who was involved in homosexuality shot. And after the Roehm purge in ‘34, open or quasi-open homosexuality rapidly disappeared...

I'm not quite sure of your point here. Roehm and many others, perhaps including Der Fuerher, were gay, but they reformed by lining a bunch of the flamers up against the wall? And that renders the connection a non-connection?

[Roehm and the SA leadership were shot because they were perceived as too Red, not because so many of them were too lavender].

I've read Shirer's book probably half a dozen times and I missed that little factoid. I'll have to check it again.

24 posted on 05/02/2009 8:51:39 AM PDT by Steely Tom (RKBA: last line of defense against vote fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: raptor29

No. I wasn’t there. But then, I doubt you were either. And I sincerely doubt any gay Nazis were going to come out to you if you were. or let you watch them do interrogations. Himmler’s orders and the execution of homosexual SS men are historical facts.The basic premise of the article is hisdtorical surmise. Try to understand the diference some time.

And while the SA leadership did, indeed, play a vital role in establishing the Nazi regime, they [including a great many non-homosexual SA leaders] were killed, and the SA eradicated as a major player in Nazi politics after KALIBRI.


25 posted on 05/02/2009 8:53:16 AM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
It’s much the same with Islam. Homosexuality is extremely common in the Arab world. Dominant homosexuals can do what they like, and submissive homosexuals are the ones who get hanged.

The sadomasochistic tendencies of the Islamists and treatment of women is rooted in their covert homoeroticism...

A cursory psychoanalysis of the masochistic left in the West will find that most of those submissive, feminized males are most often allied with Islam because of such militant, misogynist attitudes in their deviant thinking concerning sexuality. Like Islamics, nothing sets them off more than any criticism at all, even if it is founded in the facts of biological reality.

26 posted on 05/02/2009 8:57:11 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

I’m not persuaded by the history books I’ve read that the case of Hitler’s alleged homosexuality is a proven fact. Be that as it may, the point I was arguing,is that open homosexuality , of either the effeminate or more ‘muscular’ type was subject to draconian penalties after the Night of the Long Knives. And since the premise articulated in the article was that the ‘effeminate’ gays were persecuted by their less flamboyant brethren, we arrived at the regime’s enforcement apparatus, the SS, and the German police forces: the Sicherheitspolitzei, Ordnungspolitzei and the SS SD. Which was why I mentioned Himmler’s orders and actions regarding homosexuality in the SS.


27 posted on 05/02/2009 9:01:38 AM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: boycott

what is SGA?


28 posted on 05/02/2009 9:03:11 AM PDT by NoExpectations
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

It has always seemed to me that one reason for its success is that Islam is a religion expressly designed for the dominance of cowardly bullies and sadists. It has been much more successful than Communism at seizing power and maintaining power.


29 posted on 05/02/2009 9:04:19 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Were not the majority of the first members of the nazi party homosexual?


30 posted on 05/02/2009 9:10:13 AM PDT by DMG2FUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoExpectations

Student Government Association.


31 posted on 05/02/2009 9:10:37 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DMG2FUN

I wouldn’t say a majority, although Ernst Rohm certainly was.

But one thing that always struck me, is that when you look at the ideal Aryan that the Nazis talked about, and then looked at their leadership, very few looked anything like that ideal, they mostly had dark hair, and were rather scrawny in appearance. Goebbels was even born with a clubbed foot, which was considered a birth defect, and under the Nazi guidelines, would have made him eligible to be euthanized.


32 posted on 05/02/2009 9:14:12 AM PDT by dfwgator (1996 2006 2008 - Good Things Come in Threes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr
The "Roehm was too much a lefty for Der Fuehrer" idea checks out; thanks for educating me on that. The connections between the Nazis and homosexuality seem to have been made, to a large extent, through the membership of the S.A. That being said, however, don't we have to remember that the S.A. was vital to the rise of Hitler and the NSDAP? Hitler figured out quickly that the unsavory and intellectually limited Roehm was not helping him with his larger plans. According to Shirer, Hitler had many arguments with Roehm in which he tried to convince him of this (Shirer describes Roehm as Hitler's "oldest friend" at one point). As Hitler began to circulate more in the circles of high-ranking military men and wealthy industrial tycoons, he realized that Roehm would have to go (be "kicked under the bus," to use a more current expression). Roehm's homosexual network within the S.A. kept alerted him to the growing danger, but he chose to ignore it.

Shirer does describe Roehm's belief in and plans for a "second revolution," more of a communist revolution, and states that this was a major point of disagreement between the two friends.

33 posted on 05/02/2009 9:19:32 AM PDT by Steely Tom (RKBA: last line of defense against vote fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr
Hitler liked dogs. Kept GSDs.

In Germany they're known as SDs.

34 posted on 05/02/2009 9:24:51 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler ("Mr. President, I support you but not your mission. I'm showing my patriotism through dissent.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr
I’m not persuaded by the history books I’ve read that the case of Hitler’s alleged homosexuality is a proven fact.

Yes, of course you're right about that. His long relationship with Eva Braun and his much earlier and more tempestuous relationship with the beautiful Geli Raubal (which ended, as you know, with her death, apparantly self-induced) mitigate against the identification of Hitler as an actual homosexual.

According to Shirer, the S.A. numbered 2 million at it's height, and functioned as the Nazi party's police force during its formative years.

35 posted on 05/02/2009 9:28:27 AM PDT by Steely Tom (RKBA: last line of defense against vote fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Republic

“Obama caught up in gay murder controversy”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2014445/posts


36 posted on 05/02/2009 9:28:39 AM PDT by blackminorca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Many rank and file SA members started out as Communist street brawlers, they had about as much loyalty as Arlen Specter.


37 posted on 05/02/2009 9:29:35 AM PDT by dfwgator (1996 2006 2008 - Good Things Come in Threes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Interesting that a similar thing happened in Cuba in the 1960s — Castro, whose inner circle was a cabal of male & female homosexuals— created concentration camps (UMAP)
for homsexuals. This was all documented in the film ,”Improper Conduct”(1984). Of course, almost no gay in the US and elsewhere spoke out against Castro at the time.


38 posted on 05/02/2009 9:48:50 AM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

The night of the long knives occured because Reohm differed with Hitler when it came to the nationalization of German industry, (which the earlier asertion that it happened because of being too red is close) Hitler earler discussed nationalization of industry in Mein Kamph but like Mussolini (who by the way blocked Hitlers’s first attempt to seize Austria) followed the fascist school of socialism and discarded that aspect of communisim because of the support by Farben and Krupp. Then there is Himler,which took over the remanants of the disbanded SA .

Himler is very interesting because he organized SS Strum Stauffen units composed solely and comanded by officers of French, White Russian/Ukraine, Lithuaninan,and slav/ Romainan and others in the later stages of WWII.

In fact Vlasoff’s army (a SS unit outfitted by Himler) liberated Prague Czecheslovkia from the Greman SS units only to be turned over to the Russian Army and liquidated.


39 posted on 05/02/2009 9:53:04 AM PDT by mosesdapoet (2010 One year to a new census and congressional redistricting, we need a strong hand in the House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Barney Frank RATS, HEADS UP.


40 posted on 05/02/2009 9:53:57 AM PDT by Waco (Libs exhale too much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson