Posted on 04/30/2009 11:50:51 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
Yeah, I know. Said some similar things about Bush in 2000. But at least he was pro-life, pro-family, etc, and thank God we supported him over the idiot All Green Gore.
Said similar things about McCain in 2008. But when asked the question "when does human life begin?," and he unabashedly stated, "At conception, of course," I had to take notice. Then when he announced Sarah Palin as his running mate, I decided to support her. I voted for Sarah (and the white haired old geezer that came along with the package).
But Romney is a NO go. And I don't care who this socialist, abortionist, homosexualist, constitution trampling bastard picks for running mate. If Romney's in I'm out!
G.O.P., R.I.P!
Hey Jim, would you mind rating your top ten Conservative Presidential Possibilities? Ok ok, top five then. Three?
Remember you can’t say Slim Pickens, he passed away in 1983,
Thanks for the video evidence. Romney stated the same thing about Gov. Palin not to long ago on Larry King. And NYC I am not doing the research for you But the evidence is there. So put that in your pipe and smoke it.
Here are three that I’d like to take a closer at:
Haley Barbour
Sarah Palin
Mark Sanford
Thanks, Jim. You just insured that Romney will get the nomination! : )
I am against him too: he is on video as declaring how he would not oppose abortion even one iota. Then he fake switched positions for the 2008 primaries. He is a weasel: a Romney Administration would look like a Giuliani Administration.
The man who should be the nominee for President in 2012 is U.S. Congressman Mike Pence.
People will say that he doesn't have national name recognition, but neither did a lot of contenders before they joined the race. It has to be about quality first. Mike Pence has that.
What they should be doing is not "expanding beyond the conservative base". They should be "expanding the conservative base" by educating the politically ignorant how big government is antithetical to freedom and prosperity.
I copied JR?
Anyways, if you can show where I have ever lied about Romney I would probably cede your point.
However...
I don’t see it. There’s no cheap shot there.
I didn’t like the GOP ticket, either, though I voted GOP as I always do. One thing that bothered me about Palin was her support of the public school system and funding. (We’re a homeschool family.)
But, maybe she’ll rethink that position over the next few years...
Amen and hear, hear!
Amen, Jim. Fortunately, there aren’t enough compromising conservatives like Ann Coulter for him to ever win the GOP nomination for President.
The thing that always gets me about those on FR singlemindedly driven to promote Romney is that some of them are so nasty.
In the end, they do their candidate of choice no good at all. A good friend of mine is a Democrat and I tell him that there is no way I could ever be in the same “tent” as Nancy Pelosi, Bobby Rush and Barbara Lee.
Then I saw Col. Bud Day give him his unqualified endorsement. In fact, just about everyone of McCain's fellow POWs endorsed him or praised his behavior in prison, unlike, say, Kerry's crew.
If want to believe every bad thing whispered about someone on the internet, I can't stop you but you are going to sound like a 9/11 truther.
If you want to attack McCain-Feingold or McCain-Kennedy, fine. I'll support you. But Dubya supported those things too. In fact, McCain might have better instincts and actually might be more conservative than Dubya was. At least McCain came out hard for the surge and against Fannie Mae's lending policies way before it was evident as to the disaster they would be.
>>>If Mitt Romney is in, Im in.
No finer person and/or candidate.<<<
Are you referring to the fervently conservative, pro-life, pro-small goverment, anti-illegal immigration, pro-gun Mitt Romney, who popped up a couple of years ago, (coincidentally, just in time for the GOP primaries) or the equally fervently Liberal, pro-abortion, pro-big goverment, pro-socialized medicine, pro-illegal immigrant, gun-grabbing Governor of Massachussetts, Mitt Romney?
You really made my point about people not doing any research. I gave you a link to dozens of stories about McCain’s perfidies and only a few, if any, had anything to do with his Vietnam experiences. If you’re that lazy you’ll just follow whatever the MSM tells you.
Romney doesn’t give me a thrill up my leg, that’s for sure.
Isn't America great freedom of thought!
I am not a shame I try myself to be a good person and will not shrink away from all this nasty negatvie things being said about Romney.
Peace to all of you, one can not help how another person heart feels about things and these are hard lessons to learn.
If I could have lived my life half as good as he did and the discipline to strive to do the right thing and endure those around you who will take things and bend them so out of shape people can not recognize them
I know Rush is fair towards Romney as well as Hannity, Levin , Coulter, Ingram they all can't be wrong! In all due respect Cheers!
ONCE TO EVERY MAN AND NATION
http://nethymnal.org/htm/o/n/oncetoev.htm
Once to every man and nation, comes the moment to decide,
In the strife of truth with falsehood, for the good or evil side;
Some great cause, some great decision, offering each the bloom or blight,
And the choice goes by forever, twixt that darkness and that light.
Then to side with truth is noble, when we share her wretched crust,
Ere her cause bring fame and profit, and tis prosperous to be just;
Then it is the brave man chooses while the coward stands aside,
Till the multitude make virtue of the faith they had denied.
By the light of burning martyrs, Christ, Thy bleeding feet we track,
Toiling up new Calvries ever with the cross that turns not back;
New occasions teach new duties, time makes ancient good uncouth,
They must upward still and onward, who would keep abreast of truth.
Though the cause of evil prosper, yet the truth alone is strong;
Though her portion be the scaffold, and upon the throne be wrong;
Yet that scaffold sways the future, and behind the dim unknown,
Standeth God within the shadow, keeping watch above His own.
Man. Eddie Haskell aint got nothin on Romney.
Its high time to put Americas kids first and leave the union bosses behind! tepid applause
The right answer for Detroit is this: Fix it first! Huh? I suppose hes talking about NOT bailing them out, because he just got through explaining that the TARP funds were somewhat justified but still, Huh? Its like another nonsensical gem:
We will have to fight to make sure America stays America. Such gratuitous flourish is all the more ironic because in the next few breaths he embraces conservative government programs to interfere with er, fix health care, education, and energy issues. Back in the day, America meant freedom from such government meddling. My dear conservative Dad and Mom have pretty much always held up freedom from government meddling as being "America," as opposed to every other country that had government dictating health choices, education, energy, and who knows what else.
[We conservatives] believe in Democracy . Conservatives favor clear, streamlined, up-to-date regulations and laws that let the economy work .
Now, I know that plenty will accuse me of cherry-picking quotes. Im not two out of every three sentences from the guy are made up of this kind of prattle. Heres another one To recover our country is our first concern. Yeah, so tell me something I dont already know.
The third of the sentences that deal with substance are pretty bothersome. For example, he talks about how Obamas plan, while some will help, basically means universal government, and that model has never worked anywhere in the world. So what does Mitt want semi-universal government? Is that what conservatives stand for? It sure sounds like thats what he thinks he goes on to talk about how his health plan in Massachusetts is a great thing. He says that the power of the government is limited by the constitution. Boy, thats helpful! Thanks, Eddie er, Mitt!
Then he says that with cap-and-trade, lets have a world-wide solution, not an American one -- a solution to a problem, global climate control, that is a hoax power grab to justify control of energy production. He talks about free markets properly regulated, which sounds next-door to an oxymoron, and next says that in some cases Democrat policies encouraged abuses at Fannie and Freddie, and in some cases those abuses were for political gain . *sigh* Some cases? And excuse me, arent Freddie and Fannie the antithesis of free markets entities, kind of the way Public Radio is? So why is Romney legitimizing them as part of the playing field, instead of condeming their being players in a free market in thte firt place.
Im afraid to even verbalize what I think a real conservative would say, because like suck-up Eddie Haskell who knew how to look like an angel to Church Ladies and Community Leaders, Romney would start saying them ignorant of the principle anchoring them, and people would actually fall for it. Some of us know when were being buttered up. Some of us know how to discern empty verbiage from real information.
But for the Romney fans, it goes right over their heads. Just like conservative principle sails over Romney's head.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.