Posted on 04/30/2009 11:50:51 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
Yeah, I know. Said some similar things about Bush in 2000. But at least he was pro-life, pro-family, etc, and thank God we supported him over the idiot All Green Gore.
Said similar things about McCain in 2008. But when asked the question "when does human life begin?," and he unabashedly stated, "At conception, of course," I had to take notice. Then when he announced Sarah Palin as his running mate, I decided to support her. I voted for Sarah (and the white haired old geezer that came along with the package).
But Romney is a NO go. And I don't care who this socialist, abortionist, homosexualist, constitution trampling bastard picks for running mate. If Romney's in I'm out!
G.O.P., R.I.P!
1,000
I’d be willing to bet that if Jim Robinson did a poll on this, the majority of FReepers would be on the other side... There are tons of FReepers who don’t want to get involved in arguments with the same vile posters that attack you at every opportunity...
To the point that if I’m wrong, and the majority agree with JRob’s view, I’ll ban myself from FR... Now, that’s not incentive enough for JRob to do a survey, but I figure shutting me up might be incentive enough for some of you to push it.
Throw Reagan around all you like, but he would not have approved of this type of posting.
And it is NOT a POLITICAL question — it’s a question of DECENCY and TRUTHFULNESS (i.e., acting like CIVIL and RESPECTFUL ADULTS).
Go find it yourself loser
- - - - - - - -
ROFLAICGU! I did find it, but thank you for showing exactly how discourteous and your true character by attacking me for asking for simple etiquette on your behalf.
Diogenesis can’t hide behind REAGAN.
I hope all is well with you, NYC REPUBLICAN! :-)
This is the type of garbage that comes out of KEITH OLBERMANN’s mouth daily.
I wonder if the LDS mittiacs would still support him if he WASN’T LDS?
I can only say that I have observed that most of them are conservative posters on any subject but Mitt.
- - - - - - — - -
Which makes me wonder why Mitt is such a blind spot for them. I think they support him, despite his record, simply because he is LDS.
Questioning the poster’s rhetoric is one thing...trolling the thread and using Reagan’s name is quite another. I have known you to make better use of your comments.
“Oh, and let me ad ...
This is the type of garbage that comes out of KEITH OLBERMANN’s mouth daily.”
“Reagan was adamantly pro-choice.”
Mitt Romney
“I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I’m not trying to return to Reagan-Bush.”
Mitt Romney
Many of us, (including the poster of this article), decided to vote for the republican ticket because of the presence of Palin on the ticket.
Palin being on a Mitt ticket would not have been enough to make me vote for that ticket.
- - - — - - - - -
Agreed. I held my nose on McCain because of Palin.
I love Sarah, but I could never support her on the same ticket as Romney. Fortunately, I doubt that will ever happen.
ROTFL!
I’m sorry that what I’m saying has to be explained to you.
ROTFLMBO at THIS...coming from YOU!!!
Wow. ejonesie posts a polite, thoughtful response and what does he get in return?
*What a complete slob you ARE and your mocking post to me is.*
Get your head out of the sand TA.
Palin being on a Mitt ticket would not have been enough to make me vote for that ticket.
__________________________________________
Gov Palin would not have been on a Romney ticket...
Romney would not have been allowed to run a woman for VP...
That is putting it mildly.
Ping to 1002..you are mentioned.
I’m sorry that you play so many games and insult Reagan by connecting his name with such an anti Reagan politician such as Mitt Romney.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.