Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Answering the ‘new atheists’
Creation Magazine ^ | Lael Weinberger

Posted on 04/27/2009 9:01:01 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts

--snip--

I asked Doug why the atheists are suddenly so active, and getting so much attention.

‘For many years, atheism has been patronizing to Christian theists—they would pat us on the head and say, you can be allowed your silly little superstition. But it’s beginning to dawn on them that they might lose, and they’ve panicked. They’re worried at the resurgence of conservative Christianity in the United States'...

(Excerpt) Read more at creation.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: abortion; catholic; christian; creation; evolution; homosexualagenda; intelligentdesign; moralabsolutes; philosophy; prolife; religion; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 04/27/2009 9:01:01 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: metmom; DaveLoneRanger; editor-surveyor; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; MrB; GourmetDan; Fichori; ...

Interesting take on why the atheist have suddenly become so militant! All the best—GGG


2 posted on 04/27/2009 9:02:19 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

I’m skeptical on this take. Recent poll data suggests a surge in atheism in the last 10-15 years. This is predictable from the Vitz hypothesis, which suggests that many atheists choose atheism as a reflection of their hostility towards their earthly fathers. In an era of broken families and deadbeat dads, one would expect a surge in atheism if this hypothesis is correct, and I think that is what we are seeing. As they grow in numbers, we would naturally expect them to become more militant.


3 posted on 04/27/2009 9:25:13 AM PDT by Liberty1970 (Democrats are not in control. God is. And Thank God for that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
They must assume the existence of moral standards (for instance, ‘truth’ is an inherent good), borrowed from Christianity, before they can attack the Christian faith (if truth wasn’t inherently good, why would it matter to Sam Harris that I believe in a God he doesn’t think exists?).

This argument is so tired. It reminds me of how pro-affirmative action folks insult those who are against it (Thomas, Sowell) as being recipients of affirmative action but not appreciating and supporting it.

The American theist takes everything positive aspect of human philosophy from freedom to charity and takes credit for it.

Even though Confucius gave us the Golden Rule 500 years before Jesus was born, we're supposed to believe that morality is impossible without a theistic Christian God. Demonstrably false.

4 posted on 04/27/2009 9:26:43 AM PDT by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
When I mentioned cosmology and the overall structure of the universe
the atheist suddenly said, "I don't want to talk about it anymore."

How convenient.

5 posted on 04/27/2009 9:31:24 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
Damned militant atheists - can't they just leave the theists alone?


6 posted on 04/27/2009 9:35:18 AM PDT by Riodacat (Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner

The question is whether or not truth is an inherent good. Do you consider truth to be an inherent good, GunRunner?


7 posted on 04/27/2009 9:48:39 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
"Even though Confucius gave us the Golden Rule 500 years before Jesus was born, we're supposed to believe that morality is impossible without a theistic Christian God. Demonstrably false. "

The Golden Rule is "true." it is an absolute truth that Confucius and Jesus (and others) all declared. They did not invent it, they discovered it or deduced it, or learned it by revelation, but they did not invent it.

That truth cannot exist unless it is possible for something to exist that is non-material/existential. The Golden Rule is a non-material truth. Atheism -tends- to discard entirely anything that does not exist in material space.

Here is a link to a good debate in which both sides do fairly well, but the atheist never answers the theists best question: Apol_Bahnsen_Stein_Debate_Transcript
8 posted on 04/27/2009 9:49:52 AM PDT by Miykayl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
If a God has created this Creation and Man, then it makes sense that His laws are imprinted on every human heart. Which is exactly what the Bible says.

So, I don't know why it would be a shock that Confucius would have articulated the Golden Rule before Jesus. Contrary to popular belief; Jesus didn't invent anything new, all of his teachings were based on the OT (since Jesus was God, this makes sense that he would be working with what has already been revealed) -- including his famous response to the question of what the Greatest Commandment was.

I'm sure you remember it, but others may appreciate the following:

"'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.' This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.' All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments"

Interestingly, the followers of Confucius (or Buddha, or Hinduism, or secular Communism or Islam) never ended up amounting to much. The followers of the OT and the NT are the focus for good in the modern world.
9 posted on 04/27/2009 9:57:01 AM PDT by rom (Obama '12 slogan: Let's keep on hopin'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Miykayl

I’m downloading that to read later! Thanks for that!


10 posted on 04/27/2009 9:58:11 AM PDT by rom (Obama '12 slogan: Let's keep on hopin'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Hate against Christians is allowed now. That’s the key difference. That’s why the atheists keep their mouths shut about Islam. They know it isn’t allowed.

When Atheists try to debate me about “Theism”, I frame their argument as against Islam. They don’t last very long.


11 posted on 04/27/2009 10:03:04 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Liberty1970

[[In an era of broken families and deadbeat dads, one would expect a surge in atheism if this hypothesis is correct, and I think that is what we are seeing.]]

I think there’s some truth to this- it’s also a reason why there’s a huge increase in violence and disrespect as well- these kids today just have NO parental guidance growing up- but I also htink the article above gives soem insight as well


12 posted on 04/27/2009 10:04:57 AM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Miykayl
"The Golden Rule is a non-material truth.

It is no more a "non-material truth" than any other adage conveying practical advice, like "honesty is the best policy," or "good fences make good neighbors," or "a stitch in time saves nine," or "look before you leap."

"Atheism -tends- to discard entirely anything that does not exist in material space.

Which, I suppose, explains why atheists are always burning their hands on hot stoves. They just don't "get" that "non-material truth" stuff.

13 posted on 04/27/2009 10:08:35 AM PDT by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: atlaw

Tell me: why IS honesty the best policy? Sometimes a little white lie could be better, right? Or maybe you could get ahead in life with embellishing your resume, or stretching the truth a bit on your taxes. Why not?

As for the stove, I think fire counts as material :-)


14 posted on 04/27/2009 10:15:15 AM PDT by rom (Obama '12 slogan: Let's keep on hopin'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
More subcultures are getting more traction in the courts and with regards to public opinion: gays, transgendered, pet owners, non-smokers, autism sufferers, etc.

Why shouldn't atheists get their turn?

Maybe they can extract some subsidies from the taxpayers when all is said and done.

15 posted on 04/27/2009 10:15:50 AM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear (The cosmos is about the smallest hole a man can stick his head in. - Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
"That’s why the atheists keep their mouths shut about Islam."

Some atheists, maybe, but not all.

There are a number of atheists who use Islamic extremism and terrorism as a major data point in favor of their view.

16 posted on 04/27/2009 10:18:19 AM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear (The cosmos is about the smallest hole a man can stick his head in. - Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rom
"Sometimes a little white lie could be better, right?

Sometimes it is. But the practicality of the advice is based on the generally beneficial result. There's nothing "supernatural" about it, just accumulated experience passed on.

17 posted on 04/27/2009 10:25:40 AM PDT by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
The question is whether or not truth is an inherent good. Do you consider truth to be an inherent good, GunRunner?

That wasn't the question posed by the author. The author was asking why we should listen to people who are not theists.

Part of the answer is that the truths you are referring to are inherent to non-theists, and their practice isn't is not dependent on what ancient text you hold as divine.

18 posted on 04/27/2009 10:44:12 AM PDT by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: atlaw

I see a lot of people passing on advice that they tell me is beneficial: My own relatives tell me how I can stretch things on my taxes to avoid paying my full amount! They’re of course pretty liberal and wealthy. I think that they typify what we see in the Obama administration wrt his appointments. But it still amazes me when it’s my own family. I will say that with my family, it is not blatant theft like the Obama administration. It is more like stretching the truth of what a remodel was really for, what they use their ‘company vehicles’ for, etc...

Seems to me that they’ve done what is beneficial to their wealth, but I’ve not taken advantage of it by being completely honest with the government.

I guess I should pass on this accumulated experience to my children — after all, they’re saving lots more money than I! But I wouldn’t feel right about it.

For me, I know why — because my God doesn’t tolerate ANY sin; I am made in His image, his laws are written upon our hearts, and the Holy Spirit dwells within me.

Also, Jesus told me to render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and to render unto God what is God’s.

Sorry about the length of my post, it was probably for my own benefit to analyze my family rather than yours. LOL!

Thanks for indulging me, and all the best!


19 posted on 04/27/2009 10:50:30 AM PDT by rom (Obama '12 slogan: Let's keep on hopin'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Miykayl
The Golden Rule is a non-material truth. Atheism -tends- to discard entirely anything that does not exist in material space.

You're mistaking a rejection of the supernatural for a rejection of everything that is transcendent, numinous, and existential.

I'm certainly not someone who rejects the latter ideas, but then again, non-belief takes as many forms as belief. I'm sure there are some who do reject those things, but there's no central creed or text that speaks for all non-theists.

20 posted on 04/27/2009 10:50:33 AM PDT by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson