Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Appointee Suggests Radical Plan for Newspaper Bailout
FOX NEWS ^ | 04/17/2009 | FOX NEWS

Posted on 04/17/2009 6:06:45 AM PDT by RaceBannon

Influential Los Angeles Times columnist Rosa Brooks has hung up her journalistic hat and joined the Obama administration, but not before penning a public proposal calling for some radical ideas to help bail out the failing news industry.

Brooks, who has taken up a post as an adviser at the Pentagon, advocated upping "direct government support for public media" and creating licenses to govern news operations.

"Years of foolish policies have left us with a choice: We can bail out journalism, using tax dollars and granting licenses in ways that encourage robust and independent reporting and commentary, or we can watch, wringing our hands, as more and more top journalists are laid off," she wrote in her parting column on April 9.

Brooks said this would help rescue the industry from a "death spiral" and left the government unaccountable to the journalists who must keep it honest. "[I] can't imagine anything more dangerous than a society in which the news industry has more or less collapsed," she wrote.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; censorship; democratcongress; democrats; enemedia; liberalmedia; lping; msm; obama; obamedia; revolution; rosabrooks; takeover; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-162 next last
To: GlennBeck08
Where did our country go?

It is easy to think of Nazi Germany as "a long time ago" or a "different world from us", but it wasn't. It was a VERY modern society with professionals, doctors, lawyers, engineers and scientists. Plenty of private business owners, etc. A very modern society. A few crazies got hold of some power, demonized an out of favor group and rode that to dictatorial power. Not everyone supported the Nazis, but it became dangerous to oppose them. We are already being called "terrorists" and "despicable" by those in power for disagreeing with them. THOSE IN POWER, not left-wing crazies on the net...THOSE IN POWER!

61 posted on 04/17/2009 6:56:12 AM PDT by Onelifetogive (Check out Puppy News at www.buyingapuppy.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jer33 3

“The Central Organ”

Communism is frought with peril.


62 posted on 04/17/2009 6:59:28 AM PDT by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush
I can’t for the life of me, figure out WHY she would be named as an advisor in the Pentagon!! What does the Pentagon have to do with newspapers?

It's the Soviet model. Military units were assigned "political officers" whose job was to ensure that the units stayed loyal to the regime. The political officers would maintain networks of informants. Any officer or soldier with the "wrong" opinions would be sent to the Gulag, like Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn was.

Given the number of Republicans in the military, ensuring the loyalty of military units, and purging them of "politically incorrect" elements will be a major objective of the Obama regime. Reporters are expert in getting information by making the gullible think that the reporter is his friend and can be talked to.

63 posted on 04/17/2009 7:00:54 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
left the government unaccountable to the journalists who must keep it honest.

My God!!!
Can anything be further from the truth???

64 posted on 04/17/2009 7:01:05 AM PDT by evad (YES!! I WANT Fub0's Agenda TO FAIL!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buggy02
What help would a bailout do anyway? If no one buys the paper, and then they would have to generate some advertizing revenue, but who would buy a spot in the paper if no one reads it.

Everyone would pay for the paper through taxes. The Post Office would deliver it with the mail. And, just like the post office has a legally-enforced monopoly on first-class mail, the nationalized papers would have a legally-enforced monopoly on advertising.

65 posted on 04/17/2009 7:04:50 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
Whose Constitution? Theirs (the living one) or ours(the real one)?

Ours. Constitution: The Real.

(Good point, though...)

66 posted on 04/17/2009 7:06:42 AM PDT by paulycy (BEWARE the LIBERAL/MEDIA Complex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
Brooks said this would help rescue the industry from a "death spiral" and left the government unaccountable to the journalists who must keep it honest. "[I] can't imagine anything more dangerous than a society in which the news industry has more or less collapsed," she wrote.


Yeah, I can't imagine anything that will further honest journalism and discussion of government more than having the government pay journalists. And I'm SURE that government would be just as willing to bail out a small conservative journal as a dying newspaper with liberal tendencies.
67 posted on 04/17/2009 7:08:08 AM PDT by SeminoleSoldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief

Freedom of the Press is just that and any tampering with that by ZERO and his “numbskulls” needs to be taken seriously. Conservatives better be getting some deep pockets to start taking things like this to Court. I don’t normally advocate going the Court route but when you mess with the Constitution, then it is time to take action.

Even the thought of a Government bailout for the MSM sends chills up my spine. The newspapers are failing because of their bias including lying. Goes to show that the majority of people who read the papers are conservative or their readership would be up not down.

An award winning, honest, ethical journlist will always have a job. Biased reporters need to be shown the door.


68 posted on 04/17/2009 7:08:22 AM PDT by PhiKapMom ( BOOMER SOONER! Mary Fallin for OK Governor in 2010! Vote Gary for OK GOP Chair)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
or we can watch, wringing clapping our hands, as more and more top journalists commie propagandists are laid off

Hmmm... decisions, decisions...

69 posted on 04/17/2009 7:13:09 AM PDT by roamer_1 (It takes a (Kenyan) village to raise an idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

“can’t imagine anything more dangerous than a society in which the news industry has more or less collapsed”

Rosa, it already collapsed a long time ago, when you all stopped reported and started advocating. You’re not “news”papers; you’re simply propaganda talking points.


70 posted on 04/17/2009 7:17:27 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Meanwhile, the sheeple graze mindlessly while awaiting slaughter at Hope and Change Ranch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
Given the number of Republicans in the military, ensuring the loyalty of military units, and purging them of "politically incorrect" elements will be a major objective of the Obama regime. Reporters are expert in getting information by making the gullible think that the reporter is his friend and can be talked to.

It's already happened. Look at the prosecutions of combat soldiers and their officers. Look closely at the pictures and tell me what you see.

71 posted on 04/17/2009 7:32:37 AM PDT by erman (Outside of a dog, a book is man's best companion. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
...the news industry has more or less collapsed...

What makes here so certain it's "collapsed"? I think it's merely in a state of transition.

CA....

72 posted on 04/17/2009 7:36:42 AM PDT by Chances Are (Whew! It seems I've at last found that silly grin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: jersey117
Especially for so-called journalists.

I heard yesterday that there are more students in journalism schools then there are working journalists in the entire country. I lot of people are going to wind up with J-school degrees they can't use and loans they have to pay back.

73 posted on 04/17/2009 7:38:59 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
...to the journalists who must keep it honest.

ROFLMAO...rosa is just SO very funny!!!!!!

74 posted on 04/17/2009 7:40:39 AM PDT by top 2 toe red (O-B-A-M-A = One Big Ass Mistake, America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
or we can watch, wringing our hands, as more and more top journalists are laid off," she wrote in her parting column on April 9.

That's a major part of your problem, lady. Few of these people you refer to as "top journalists" are journalists at all, let alone top journalists. All too many of them are political hacks posing as journalists, using their positions to push personal and political agendas rather than to report facts to the readers.

Good riddance, and none should be bailed out. These problems have been long in the making, and the current recession is a minor part of it.

75 posted on 04/17/2009 7:43:44 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

O’Reilly has been talking about this woman’s appointee all week...he is absolutely terrified that she will now have access to top Pentagon secrets.


76 posted on 04/17/2009 7:44:12 AM PDT by top 2 toe red (O-B-A-M-A = One Big Ass Mistake, America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malone LaVeigh
I'll bet my list of top journalists is a lot shorter than hers.

I have enough fingers to count mine...with some left over.

77 posted on 04/17/2009 7:47:45 AM PDT by top 2 toe red (O-B-A-M-A = One Big Ass Mistake, America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2229492/posts?page=48#48

...and I thought I was being sarcastic


78 posted on 04/17/2009 7:48:48 AM PDT by He Rides A White Horse (unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allerious; ...
Brooks ... advocated upping "direct government support for public media" and creating licenses to govern news operations.



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!
79 posted on 04/17/2009 7:58:47 AM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

The uber secretary for agitprop.


80 posted on 04/17/2009 8:01:37 AM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson