Posted on 04/02/2009 1:51:03 PM PDT by Coleus
On a cool and rainy afternoon last week, Arlington Bishop Paul S. Loverde visited Virginia’s Democratic Sens. James Webb and Mark Warner to demonstrate Catholic opposition to the Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA) and any similar legislation. The bishop was accompanied by Father Richard Mullins, Arlington diocesan director of Multicultural Ministries, and Franciscan Sisters of the Eucharist Sister Clare Hunter, director of the Respect Life Office,
They brought 189,000 postcards that were the result of participation in a nationwide campaign by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) to prevent the passage of FOCA. The local effort was coordinated by the diocesan Respect Life Office. The two senators received approximately 63,000 cards each while U.S. Reps. Gerald Connolly, Jim Moran, Frank Wolf, Bob Goodlatte, Eric Cantor and Rob Wittman will split the remaining 63,000.
The bishops state that FOCA goes far beyond even Roe v. Wade in allowing and promoting abortion, and would lead to the elimination of informed consent laws, partial birth-abortion bans, abortion clinic regulations and conscience protection laws. Catholics in Northern Virginia agreed and came out strong in January picking up cards after Sunday Mass and filling them out for delivery to their representatives.
Bishop Loverde met with Webb in his office at the Russell Senate Building. The bishop told Webb that he represents 413,000 registered Catholics residing in Northern Virginia, and that they are concerned about FOCA and other similar legislation. Bishop Loverde said FOCA would eliminate any legislation against late-term abortions and parental notification laws. The bishop also stated that Catholics are committed not only to a decrease in abortions, but to bringing an end to the killing of innocent human life.
“(FOCA) creates a fundamental right to abortion,” the bishop said. He also voiced concerns over the possible revocation of the conscience rights regulation by President Barack Obama’s administration that protects Catholic medical workers who refuse to perform abortions. “This is a basic right,” the bishop said, describing conscience clauses as they relate to medical procedures. He cited as an example the Tepeyac Family Center in Fairfax, which is the only full-service Catholic health care center in Northern Virginia.
The bishop said this service is important to women and revocation of any conscience protection clauses would have a detrimental affect on clinics like Tepeyac. They would be forced to close. “Tepeyac reaches out to poor women,” the bishop said about the large number of Medicaid cases handled by the center. Webb said, “I’ve struggled with this issue (abortion) all my life.” He said he couldn’t argue with many of the bishop’s points.
“I strongly oppose late-term abortions,” Webb said. He did say that if his daughter was raped and became pregnant as a result, he would support her decision regarding having the baby. “These are extreme situations,” he said. “Every abortion is a tragedy.” Bishop Loverde pointed out that the overwhelming number of abortions are not connected with rape or incest.
Warner was on the Senate floor for a vote so the bishop met with Jonathon Davidson, the senator’s administrative assistant and policy director. The bishop reiterated opposition to FOCA and related legislation. Davidson said that although these are important issues, the senator and staff are “focused on getting the economy fixed.” When Bishop Loverde expressed Catholics’ opposition to revocation of conscience clauses, Davidson said he needed to become more familiar with the issue and that Warner would like the bishop to return for a personal visit with him.
Davidson did express gratitude to the bishop for the visit and its importance. “It’s good to have input (into the issues) early on,” he said. Bishop Loverde was generally pleased with the visits and saw them as a first step to more dialogue. “These visits make absolutely clear our grave concerns about these issues and our firm and committed determination to protect life from conception to natural death. I welcome future opportunities to make our position clear and, in fact, will seek them out,” he said.
.
This is just from ONE diocese, all 195 dioceses participated. Millions were signed all over the Country.
I heard from someone at church that there have been over 2 million red envelopes delivered.
What’s the count, actually, about 40 million since RvW?
Correction 40 million a year...?
I appreciate the effort but don’t see it will do any good. Congress doesn’t care what the people want.
I didn’t even hear about this until now. I would imagine my local parish participated.
Our pastor had the cards in church one Sunday, and actually took the time to walk us all through filling out cards to our two lamebrain pro-baby-butchering US Senators and our various lamebrain Democrat US Representatives.
I was disgusted that some people refused to fill out the postcards. Vile vermin.
Nonetheless, I estimate that we generated a couple of thousand postcards just from our parish.
The greenies are going to be pissed now look at all them trees being destroyed my o my.
The greenies are going to be pissed now look at all them trees being destroyed my o my.
Cool. We have four incoming from my family!
We sent out 20 Red Envelopes on Tuesday. I know of 80 more that went out from the other families in our fellowship group.
I hope that the White House mailroom is flooded with RED!
http://www.redenvelopeproject.org/
189,000 postcards
That and $1.89 will get you a cup of coffee.
How many letters would Barrack Obama have to receive to give up his baby killing beliefs? How many postcards would Pelosi have to get to become Pro-Life?
I commend these leaders intentions and but I question their methods. I am afraid that campaigns like this give many people the opportunity to fell like they are “doing something.”
Nice...and absolutely meaningless.
Postcards aren’t going to move a SINGLE Democrat who supports baby killing. No, instead, their offices need to be occupied. Picketers need to be outside their door.
Sound too radical? Too bad. After Obama’s seizure of power, I feel no compunction about using the left’s tactics.
I noticed how reticent the church was BEFORE the election, you never saw a non-partisan voter guide at mass or in the diocesan newspaper. Some priests who have to contend with their parish elementary schools were more than happy to hear about national health care. That would be one major expense they wouldn’t have to pay.
Congress cares about your votes on Election Day. That’s why we win some, like the fight against amnesty.
Don’t ever, ever give up.
Great news!
And let’s contact Obama, as well:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/
Also, we should contact him about not rescinding Bush’s conscience clause. Even many proabortion people know it’s wrong to force doctors and nurses to perform abortions.
I don't know where YOUR Diocese is, but ours was jumping! Both our Pastor and the Associate preached wonderful homilies about the danger of electing people who were so pro-abortion. We had voter guides available, and there were several stories in the Diocesan newspaper leading up to the election. The Bishop wrote a story for the newspaper as well, obliterating the 'proportional evil' idea that some Social Justice Catholics were using to try to justify a vote for Obama or any pro-abortion Democrat. His response was a challenge for someone, ANYONE to show him anything the Republicans were doing that was proportional to over a millions babies being killed by abortion each year.
I was proud of our Bishop and our parish priests.
Our scripture study group sent a bunch on Tuesday. I don't know exactly how many.
yet they issued no voter guides for the flock to refer to and read with the names and pictures of the candidates with their views and voting records on it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.