Skip to comments.
Natural Born is Not Ambiguous
Stupidica ^
| 3/24/2009
| Uncredited
Posted on 03/25/2009 4:19:49 AM PDT by AJMCQ
The words natural born are depicted in fact. The word Citizenship relates to a legal status. Citizen when used alone is defined within the US constitution in Amendment XIV to describe what persons would fall into the category of US Citizenship. There also are several points of reference describing US citizenship including USC Title 8 and precedent setting cases (US v. Wong Kim Ark and Perkins v Elg). Meanwhile there are no laws or precedents existing to describe those who may or may not be a natural born Citizen. This is most likely because natural born citizen is not a legal status. It is a statement of fact. The other reason is because this unique qualification only applies to the President of the United States. To the best of my knowledge, there are no other distinctions between a citizen (natural, native, naturalized, or other) and a natural born Citizen. The qualifier natural born means that ones Citizenship is absent of ambiguity meaning both of your parents were US citizens & you were born on US soil. According to the writings of the framers of the constitution, this qualifier was put in to avoid any loyalties to any other country and at the time in particular, England. Provisions were put in to allow those who were Citizens at the time of the signing to become President.
(Excerpt) Read more at stupidica.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birther; birtherrebirth; birthers; eligibility; naturalborn; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: Little Ray
Congress cannot amend the Constitution.
It would be as convoluted as the tax code if they could...
21
posted on
03/25/2009 6:30:55 AM PDT
by
null and void
(We are now in day 65 of our national holiday from reality.)
To: Izzy Dunne
"I believe it also applies to the Vice President." The VP simply must meet all the same eligibility criteria as the President (and be from a different state).
22
posted on
03/25/2009 6:32:35 AM PDT
by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: stockpirate; Amityschild; Calpernia; ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1COUNTER-MORTER-68; 21stCenturyFreeThinker; ...
It’s going to be a busy day, folks.
23
posted on
03/25/2009 6:32:47 AM PDT
by
null and void
(We are now in day 65 of our national holiday from reality.)
To: null and void
I dunno.
The 1st amendment says “Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech...” but there is CFR.
The 2nd Amendment says “...shall not be be infringed” but there are Federal gun control laws.
The 5th Amendment says “No person shall be... deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” but we have RICO and Imminent Domain and various perversions of wildlife and wetlands protection acts. Not to mention abortion.
Seems to me there is plenty of precedent for bypassing the Constitution through few carefully worded laws.
24
posted on
03/25/2009 6:40:02 AM PDT
by
Little Ray
(Do we have a Plan B?)
To: AJMCQ; null and void; pissant; BIGLOOK; LucyT; SE Mom; Beckwith; Fred Nerks
This issue has moved way beyond a few hundred of us, labeled idiots by the elites on FR condemning us like we were the enemies.
As AJMCO noted, "This is not going to go away Mr. Soetoro!"
Proud to be a long time birther in the Rebirth of Birthers!
25
posted on
03/25/2009 6:42:26 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Does Zer0 have any friends, who are not criminals, foreign/domestic terrorists, or tax evaders?)
To: agere_contra
If Obama is found ineligible, then Biden is ineligible too. If the Obama electoral ticket was invalid then Biden is no more President than I am.
That is what I've been hearing constitutional experts saying, and all the laws he's signed would be invalid too.
26
posted on
03/25/2009 6:43:00 AM PDT
by
YellowRoseofTx
(Evil is not the opposite of God; it's the absence of God)
To: Non-Sequitur
By this definition neither candidate was a natural born citizen. Nor is Bobby Jindal. Your name truly fits your argument. Neither McCain or Jindal are the President, your point is moot.
Nice try
27
posted on
03/25/2009 7:03:26 AM PDT
by
Las Vegas Ron
(Wake up people, AIG executives are not the enemy, your Government is!)
To: Non-Sequitur
By this definition neither candidate was a natural born citizen. Nor is Bobby Jindal.
Neither is my older brother for that matter. (LOL!)
My dad was born in Norway in 23 and came here when he was about 7 years old. Right after Pearl Harbor, he tried to enlist in the military but was turned down because he wasnt a citizen. A year later he was drafted and served with honor in an infantry unit in the South Pacific.
Ive been helping my niece with her Ancestry.com project and last weekend I brought a metal box containing all my dads papers among them, birth certificates, his Army life insurance policy, his discharge papers and his naturalization document.
He didnt officially become a naturalized citizen until 1950; a year after my brother was born. But interestingly I also found a letter from one of his commanders during the war that shows he attempted to get naturalized while in the army but the government lost his initial paperwork.
I recall my father telling me that the judge conducting the swearing ceremony told my dad it was only a formality since when he took the oath of military service and his distinguished service record that had already become a citizen.
I dont know if thats legally true or not or whether or not my brother is a natural born citizen, but Ive had great fun telling my brother that he isnt, were as I am. :),
28
posted on
03/25/2009 7:05:08 AM PDT
by
Caramelgal
(When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
To: Little Ray
29
posted on
03/25/2009 7:19:44 AM PDT
by
null and void
(We are now in day 65 of our national holiday from reality.)
To: Non-Sequitur
The author is an idiot.
Natural born citizen means simply this...
By the natural act of being born, one had U.S. citizenship.
A natural born citizen is thus one who did not need a “naturalization” process to become a citizen, as by the natural act of being born they are a citizen.
30
posted on
03/25/2009 7:22:10 AM PDT
by
allmendream
("Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?")
To: bgill
31
posted on
03/25/2009 7:31:42 AM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
To: Calpernia
Someone who spells could help with the dossier. Tempering (what one does to chocolate or steel) vs tampering (interfering in a harmful way) and brake (a device for stopping a vehicle) vs break (smash).
I know it is pickayune stuff, but it makes the document look like it was filed by someone who is uneducated.
32
posted on
03/25/2009 8:18:41 AM PDT
by
Grammy
To: null and void
Bring it on!!!
Proud to be a ‘birther’. ;-)
33
posted on
03/25/2009 8:27:34 AM PDT
by
Velveeta
To: All
DR. ORLY TAITZ
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Please go to Dr. Orly's website http://defendourfreedoms.us/ and and help her. This lovely little Russian refugee is working herself to exhaustion to save YOUR country. It is reported that she is surviving on 3-4 hours sleep per night and is bearing much of the expense of her lawsuits herself. Dr. Orly is requesting researchers, lawyers, letter writers and other volunteers.
To: All
To: agere_contra
Good point. President Pelosi - be scared, be very scared!
36
posted on
03/25/2009 9:29:00 AM PDT
by
The Sons of Liberty
(Just your average Whitey clinging to my guns and religion! FUBO Kenyan Usurper- baby killing muslim)
To: bgill
They aren’t throwing it in the trash, a clerk or clerks never passed it along to them. Bad clerk! Apparently being rectified now. It’s been discussed the last few days on a lot of threads. Here’s one link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2214150/posts
Justice, Supremes confirm getting eligibility challenge
37
posted on
03/25/2009 12:21:11 PM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Asato Ma Sad Gama Tamasi Ma Jyotir Gama)
To: Grampa Dave
High fivin’ ya, Grampa Dave! hee hee -
38
posted on
03/25/2009 12:22:49 PM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Asato Ma Sad Gama Tamasi Ma Jyotir Gama)
To: allmendream
A natural born citizen is thus one who did not need a naturalization process to become a citizen, as by the natural act of being born they are a citizen. You're correct, but logic will not hold back this tide of irrationality.
39
posted on
03/25/2009 12:34:30 PM PDT
by
Sloth
(The tree of liberty desperately needs watering.)
To: Non-Sequitur
McCain was born on a military base which is considered to be US soil.
40
posted on
03/25/2009 12:53:24 PM PDT
by
2nd amendment mama
( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson