Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House to vote on 90 percent tax for AIG bonuses
AP ^ | 03192009 | STEPHEN OHLEMACHER

Posted on 03/19/2009 6:57:28 AM PDT by EBH

Edited on 03/19/2009 7:34:42 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

WASHINGTON

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aig; aigbonuses; billofattainder; congressionaltyranny; fascism; taxes; taxincrease; taxincreases; yourtaxdollarsatwork
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-285 next last
To: KC Burke
Of course there is and any that want to challenge this quietly in court will be able to get their funds back

In effect, AIG execs will STILL get their bonuses, and their campaign payments to Dodd and Obama are STILL paying off.

This is all about the Democrats protecting a valued donor. It used to be called bribery in the old days.

41 posted on 03/19/2009 7:15:37 AM PDT by kidd (Obama: The triumph of hope over evidence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: EBH
My god. How is this government NOT a domestic enemy of the people at this point?

I have no love for the Wall Street banksters who had a hand in our economic ruin, but what the government is doing right now is orders of magnitude more obscene. What Congress did to the new CEO of AIG yesterday was terrifying in its implications.

This is literally a witch-hunt, with mob rage being actively directed by the government to this handful of bonus recipients - who had legitimate contracts for same - over a piddly amount of money, in order to distract attention away from their multi-trillion-dollar money-laundering scam and outright taxpayer theft.

This must stop.

42 posted on 03/19/2009 7:16:52 AM PDT by Zeddicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan

When will we ever have an AIG man, an auto executive, or some similar person in one of those star chamber hearings speak the truth?

When will one refuse the gavel and openly reveal what Barney Frank, Dodd, and others of the congress have done to cause this? Who will have the backbone and guts to stand up to them like Howard Hughes did when he revealed his congressional tormenters corrupt relationships with his competitors? Some businessman, somewhere, must still be a patriot. Who will endanger his career to save his nation?

What executive will be questioned about his bizjet and respond by rattling off a list of the private jet use by the star chamber before him? And keep reading it no matter what the chairman says or does? When questioned about bonuses, what man will reveal the personal extortion of the banks by Dodd, Pelosi, and Frank? That man will be a national hero. I hope he is out there.


43 posted on 03/19/2009 7:17:05 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: codercpc

They initially proposed doing this to ALL companies, whether they received Federal money or not. Barney had to back off on it, but the usual way this is done is to float a trial balloon, let it get shot down, and then bring it back some other way once people have adjusted to the idea.

In other words, we will soon have confiscatory taxes on anybody who earns anything over the government-permitted maximum. However, there’s one group that maximum will never apply to: those in government.


44 posted on 03/19/2009 7:17:07 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: EBH

This is despicable. Using Congress to levy taxes because someone did what they were allowed even though excessive speaks volumes about the mentality of the RATs in the Congress.

Now can we set aside any inner-party wrangling in the GOP because everyone is not getting their way, and whip these guy’s in the 2010 elections and return some sense of ethics and common sense to the House. Get sick and tired of some people on here picking apart everything the GOP House members do when they have stood up this time with not enough votes to matter and keep getting it shoved at them. Makes me wonder just who the people are that are trying to split the Party. They sure don’t have the taxpayers best interest at part. We should be working together to throw the RATs out of power.


45 posted on 03/19/2009 7:17:18 AM PDT by PhiKapMom ( BOOMER SOONER! Mary Fallin for OK Governor in 2010! LetsGetThisRight.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH
I just love symbolic gestures. I've got a gesture for them.
46 posted on 03/19/2009 7:17:24 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

How about congress returning their salaries to the taxpayers! ...both parties!................................ Great idea! Now how do we get all those Lawyers (63%of Congress) to agree on it???? They only agree on their “raises”, cut backs? Ha, never happen!


47 posted on 03/19/2009 7:17:50 AM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (Liberals fear the return of The Cleaver Family.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EBH
"Bills of attainder, ex post facto laws, and laws impairing the obligations of contracts, are contrary to the first principles of the social compact, and to every principle of sound legislation. ... The sober people of America are weary of the fluctuating policy which has directed the public councils. They have seen with regret and indignation that sudden changes and legislative interferences, in cases affecting personal rights, become jobs in the hands of enterprising and influential speculators, and snares to the more-industrious and less-informed part of the community."

James Madison, Federalist Number 44, 1788.

48 posted on 03/19/2009 7:18:11 AM PDT by Amor patriae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH
I posted these Twain quotes on a thread about Rep.Murtha but it equally applies here. We who were against the STIMULUS Bill decried the fact that NOBODY COULD READ THIS legislation before voting on this, and any number of booby-traps could be in it. NOW we are proven CORRECT!!!

The good thing is that it is the Dims who are self-destructing on this. Even the MSM cannot fully cover this up although they are giving it their best shot. Still I am feeling good about the potential demise of Sen.Dodd, but my big fear would be him bowing out early for a more acceptable Democrat.

Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.
- Mark Twain, a Biography

It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress.
- Pudd'nhead Wilson's New Calendar (Mark Twain)

49 posted on 03/19/2009 7:18:12 AM PDT by SES1066 (Cycling to conserve, Conservative to save, Saving to Retire, will Retire to Cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Its more than that. Its an attempt to retroactively tax someone based upon moral outrage of the public; in other words, its basically mob rule.

I couldn’t care less what happens to AIG, mind you, but it sets a terrible precedent. Plus, I’m pretty sure that selectively targeting specific individuals for taxation is ILLEGAL. Unfortunately, none of this surprises me given the current occupant of the WH.


50 posted on 03/19/2009 7:19:08 AM PDT by VOR78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

complete insanity.

we need to throw all of them out of office...time to take our country back!!!


51 posted on 03/19/2009 7:21:03 AM PDT by surfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VOR78
This is dangerous to our country.

Congress is acting as judge and jury here. They are way outside their jurisdiction.

We have lost our separation of powers.

52 posted on 03/19/2009 7:23:08 AM PDT by EBH (The world is a balance between good & evil, your next choice will tip the scale.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

Pelosi took over Rangels’s job.
Every bill is being written by her staff.


53 posted on 03/19/2009 7:24:26 AM PDT by golfisnr1 (Democrats are like roaches - hard to get rid of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: varmintman
How is that not a bill of attainder or post-facto law or some such which were all expressly forbidden in the constitution and bill of rights??

Constitution...we don't need no stinkin' Constitution...!!! /sarc

54 posted on 03/19/2009 7:25:28 AM PDT by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli now reads "Oil the gun..eat the cannolis.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

Phones and faxes on the Hill need to rung off the hook.

Anger or not, this is wrong


55 posted on 03/19/2009 7:25:58 AM PDT by EBH (The world is a balance between good & evil, your next choice will tip the scale.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: varmintman

Exactly correct...but obviously the Constitution and the rule of Law is meaningless to these asshats...


56 posted on 03/19/2009 7:26:31 AM PDT by Wyatt's Torch (I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Zeddicus
What Congress did to the new CEO of AIG yesterday was terrifying in its implications.

Agreed, Liddy came out of retirement to help fix AIG. He is not the villain.

Hopefully this situation will bring some long-term common sense to executive compensation packages, i.e. pay for performance.
57 posted on 03/19/2009 7:27:35 AM PDT by TSgt (Extreme vitriol and rancorous replies served daily. - Mike W USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: EBH

These Bozos are setting themselves up for a serious fall....

If Obama were to sign this, I wonder if it won’t be the proverbial straw on the camel’s back....


58 posted on 03/19/2009 7:28:23 AM PDT by eeevil conservative (GIVE ME A PLACE TO STAND AND I WILL MOVE THE EARTH....Archimedes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eeevil conservative

...they had no obligation to pay taxes imposed by a Parliament in which they had no representation. In response, Parliament retracted the taxes with the exception of a duty on tea - a demonstration of Parliament’s ability and right to tax the colonies.


59 posted on 03/19/2009 7:33:24 AM PDT by EBH (The world is a balance between good & evil, your next choice will tip the scale.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

I called Feinsteins and boxers offices and demanded that Dodd, Obama, and Timmy be put under oath, and find out who did authorize putting this loop hole in the stimulus bill.. Dodd was lying Tuesday, and then yesterday his memory came back, and said he put the loop hole in with administrations blessing... I think also that every senator who voted for this bill should esplain why they would vote for it knowing this provision was in the bill.. after all they had 4 hrs to read it...


60 posted on 03/19/2009 7:33:29 AM PDT by JoanneSD (illegals represented without taxation.. Americans taxed without representation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-285 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson