Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rachel Maddow, reluctant sex symbol
Salon ^ | Tuesday, Feb. 24, 2009 | Judy Berman

Posted on 03/01/2009 3:46:20 PM PST by presidio9

Why do we -- men and women, gay and straight -- find Rachel Maddow sexy? Daphne Merkin's "Butch Fatale" about the newly minted MSNBC icon, hidden among the overpriced handbag porn and fluffy profiles of last weekend's New York Times T style magazine, is more complicated than it appears.

As Merkin writes, it isn't often that mainstream culture celebrates the attractiveness of butch lesbians. Sure, we admire femmes like Portia de Rossi and Lindsay Lohan. But for the most part, lesbians who wear suits, cut their hair short or otherwise don't conform to traditional standards of beauty -- the Ellen DeGenereses and Rosie O'Donnells of the world -- have to remain culturally neutered in order to participate in public life. Though we find classic representations of gay male beauty in the films of Luchino Visconti and the writings of Oscar Wilde and Thomas Mann, says Merkin, "It's much harder to envision a lesbian icon without coming up against Fran Lebowitz, looking surly and bored."

The problem with lesbian archetypes, according to Merkin, is that "both categories -- butch and femme -- borrow from gender-influenced dichotomies of beauty." And this is where Rachel Maddow, supposedly, is a revelation. "She may not be one of Hefner's Girls Next Door, exactly, but she is no bare-faced, unstylish dyke either, however she chooses to characterize herself," says Merkin, going on to coo over the way Maddow combines a light dusting of makeup with "Poindexter glasses, Jil Sander pantsuits and Converse sneakers" and concludes that "she's willing to prettify her image sufficiently to endear her to male viewers."

Here's where I disagree with Merkin: I don't think Maddow's TV appearance is particularly calculated to attract male viewers. The makeover doesn't seem like a ploy to sex up Maddow; rather, it's a concession to appearing on television, where everyone has to wear makeup and dress like a professional. According to a New York magazine profile, Maddow's partner, Susan Mikula, is responsible for her wearing makeup: "Without it, 'she looked like a dead person,'" Mikula said. And as for the designer suits, it's not as if MSNBC was going to let Maddow -- or Keith Olbermann or Chris Matthews, for that matter -- go on the air in a ratty button-down and carpenter jeans. Meanwhile, Maddow makes no effort to hide her casual, butch off-screen appearance, either. In this pre-New Year's video, also for New York magazine, a bare-faced, hoodie-clad Maddow gives a lesson in mixology.

It's true that while the butch-femme dichotomy has already broken down among many younger lesbians -- I'm hard-pressed to categorize any of my mid-20s lesbian friends as either -- Maddow is still a butch in my book (and her own). And besides, I think Merkin misses something major about what makes Maddow sexy: the nerdiness! From the "Poindexter glasses" to the Oxford Ph.D. to her perfectly crafted sarcasm, Maddow is as geek-chic as she is lesbian-chic.

Unlike Merkin, I believe Maddow when she says "she has no interest in the issue of physical appearance -- her own or anyone else's." And as much as I would love her to herald a new age of lesbian beauty, it seems to me that viewers respond more to Maddow's non-physical qualities -- intelligence, charm and, above all, authenticity -- than to her looks. But I'm interested to hear Broadsheet readers' take, too. What do you think makes Rachel Maddow sexy?


TOPICS: Extended News; Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: androgeny; culturewar; downourthroats; homosexualagenda; inourfaces; itspat; liberalnonsense; liberalturnons; megabarfalert; merkin; msnbc; pravdamedia; rachelmaddow; thatsamanbaby
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-187 next last

1 posted on 03/01/2009 3:46:20 PM PST by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Reluctant? Snort.

WAY TO SKIRT THE ISSUE

2 posted on 03/01/2009 3:47:42 PM PST by mewzilla (In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Looks like a dyke to me.


3 posted on 03/01/2009 3:48:07 PM PST by randog (Tap into America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
What do you think makes Rachel Maddow sexy?

Your obvious sexual confusion.

4 posted on 03/01/2009 3:48:13 PM PST by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Teen-age boy “masculine” is how she looks to me.
5 posted on 03/01/2009 3:48:35 PM PST by ConservativeMind (Who is now in charge of the "Office of the President-Elect"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

So, we’re supposed to find that guy in that pic sexy?


6 posted on 03/01/2009 3:48:41 PM PST by SlapHappyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Thanks, I needed a good laugh.


7 posted on 03/01/2009 3:48:51 PM PST by popdonnelly (When journalism meant something, Olbermann wouldn't have been allowed near a microphone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

She’d be a lot more “sexy” if that gray T-shirt had a cigarette pack pocket. LOL!


8 posted on 03/01/2009 3:49:06 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Just being a "U.S. citizen" does not make one an American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

From the picture I couldn’t tell if it was a gay man or a gay woman. Doesn’t matter I suppose. They are sexless anyway.


9 posted on 03/01/2009 3:49:22 PM PST by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Shouldn't this come with a massive barf alert? That's a MAN baby!


10 posted on 03/01/2009 3:49:32 PM PST by lewisglad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
wanda
11 posted on 03/01/2009 3:50:21 PM PST by JHBowden (Keep the Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Lesbianism: It’s the new black!


12 posted on 03/01/2009 3:50:25 PM PST by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Is Salon sure they got her last name correct? I always thought is was something like Madcow or Mancow.


13 posted on 03/01/2009 3:50:48 PM PST by Sergeant Tim (In the War on Terror, there is no place to run from here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I don’t find Rachel Maddow interesting in any way, shape or form. Which explains why she’s the subject of a Salon article.


14 posted on 03/01/2009 3:50:50 PM PST by popdonnelly (When journalism meant something, Olbermann wouldn't have been allowed near a microphone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Is it a boy or a girl?

I honestly can not tell. And personally I find that creepy.

15 posted on 03/01/2009 3:50:57 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Faith Manages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

This needs a mega-barf alert.


16 posted on 03/01/2009 3:51:02 PM PST by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

17 posted on 03/01/2009 3:51:14 PM PST by babubabu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

“What do you think makes Rachel Maddow sexy?”

She is keeping fully clothed and I don’t EVER look at her?


18 posted on 03/01/2009 3:51:18 PM PST by jessduntno (" We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system..." - Adolph Hitler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Sexy????? Maybe if I were a lesbian.


19 posted on 03/01/2009 3:51:22 PM PST by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipZDG6__Zfc


20 posted on 03/01/2009 3:51:28 PM PST by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson