Posted on 02/19/2009 8:50:01 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
The Galileo affair: history or heroic hagiography?
by Thomas Schirrmacher
Summary
The 17th century controversy between Galileo and the Vatican is examined. Fifteen theses are advanced, with supporting evidence, to show that the Galileo affair cannot serve as an argument for any position on the relation of religion and science. Contrary to legend, both Galileo and the Copernican system were well regarded by church officials. Galileo was the victim of his own arrogance, the envy of his colleagues and the politics of Pope Urban VIII. He was not accused of criticising the Bible, but disobeying a papal decree...
(Excerpt) Read more at creationontheweb.com ...
A political bow to the sensibilites of the modern age.
The well-funded Galileo could have been more polite, himself.
I don't get your gist. Well funded how? He had patrons, and was treated very well, given the terms of his condemnation. I think this reflected the respect that he was accorded by all, rather than any power or influence he wielded.
And more polite than what? Than to say that he suffered at the hands of the Church? If he felt that way, he certainly wasn't free to say so! He had been forced after all, on pain of torture and death, to declare that he abjured and detested what he knew to be true, and had been proud of knowing and discovering.
But I think it's fairly certain that he attributed all of this to misfortune and the turn of events, and never abandoned his loyalty to the Church. I think the sorrow that he felt was for his Church and his Country as much as for himself.
With all due respect to the great man, whom I do admire, he suggested in his book that the Pope was a "dumb-ass", to which the Pope responded by calling Galileo a "heretic." The Enlightenment took care of the rest of the hero-suffering-for-science hagiography.
You wrote:
“Are you a theocrat?”
What does that even mean? I know what the word means, but honestly what theocrats were involved here and how were they involved?
“Do I have to submit to your religious beliefs when it comes to science and technology?”
You most likely already accept my religious beliefs in regard to murder so are you suffering as a result? You most likely already accept my religious beliefs in regard to theft. Are you suffering from that? You most likely already accept my religious beliefs in regard to many moral issues. How are you suffering?
And when is an issue ever exclusively scientific or technological today? Is human cloning exclusively scientific as an issue?
“Yeah, go ahead and use your straw men of cloning and “organ harvesting” (which is a stupid myth created by people opposed to organ donation).”
Uh, no, it isn’t a myth. It just has not been fully developed as a science yet. The question is: should it be developed? And if we’re talking about science and allegations of theocracy then how can I not bring up cloning? How on earth could that be a straw man when it is a very real issue? I think you’re just dodging it because it doesn’t work for you as an issue.
“I look forward to a day when 6,000 year old Earthers share the fate of the Flat Earth Society and the Temperance League.”
In case you didn’t know, we all share exactly the same fate - we die. You will too. Hopefully, before your time comes, you’ll become more fair minded.
Control of the money for science.
Control of the printing of science.
Control of the research hiring and firings that control future science research.
Control of the classroom, movies, news media, and print media.
They are wrong on many areas - but have a full envirocratic control over may be printed and “peer reviewed.” They can't (so far) control the facts, but they are printing the lies (the doctrine) they want promoted.
What’s “funny” about this is that nowhere in the Bible does it actually maintain that the earth is the center of the universe and that the sun orbits the earth. The Vatican “scholars” were wrong.
The Big Bang, formation of the universe, and evolution of life is sequenced very accurately in Genesis: just missing a few decimal places and powers-of-ten. Which is understandable - the zero had not been invented yet.
“I think the sorrow that he felt was for his Church and his Country as much as for himself. “
Sounds a lot like the ending of 1984 ... some people love Big Brother right to the bitter end.
A classic 13th Century sword was imagined as nothing but a heavy machete-like chopper--which is far from the truth. A quality two edged sword from the high middle ages was finely crafted (as any Samurai sword), of high quality steel, and weighed in at just over 2 lbs.
Only now, within the last 10 years or so--are duplicates of such quality swords available.
Thanks for the ping!
Where can one get them? Beautiful! More as I imagine the Roman short sword.
Another falsehood was the notion that modern science originated with the Renaissance. In fact, much of modern technology began to develop during he Middle Ages, including the first mechanical clocks, and a huge numer of machines in places like the netherlands. Windmills were very numerous and many other devises. This leads naturally into theory and the development of ever more efficient machines as time wears on. Wouldn’t surprise me if someone pointed out designs of bush-league Da Vincis. The craftsmen and engineers who built the gothic cathedrals must have been enormously inventive,
If one wants an authentic replica sword, you must look for (at least!) the qualification of "tempered" or "battle ready," as there are a lot of junk-replica "wall hanger" swords out there. Most of the hand-forged swords--built just like they were in medieval times-- (if they aren't custom built) are made overseas, although, Quebec has a decent forger (but whose swords, while indestructible, tend to be heavy...). www.darksword-armory.com )
Windlass of India ( www.museumreplicas.com, makes very fine swords (including ceremonial swords for the US military) which match the quality of the middle ages, at a reasonable cost (that would be under $300).
If cost is no object, swords BETTER than those of knights can be had from some American makers--Albion (above) is the best... ( www.albion-swords.com ) made from impeccably machined steel alloys. To my mind though, these are just too perfect... to be unrecognizable to a medieval...besides costing upwards of $900.
The maker of the sword I pictured earlier (and imediately above) (a copy of King Henry V of England's sword from the early 1400s, categorized an Oakshott Type XVIII) is by another excellent hand-forged maker, Generation 2, of the Philippines www.imperialweapons.com.. This particular model is considered a breakthrough, as it is a very close replica of an actual museum piece, at (just) $260. Before this sword, exact replicas were $500 and up.
Hanwei of China ( www.casiberia.com ) also produces authentic hand-forged swords at reasonable prices. Like most of the sword makers above, they produce various designs, Asian, Medieval, or, as you like, ancient Roman designs (below).
Tempered/battle ready swords can come sharpened or unsharpened (a bone of contention among some scholars--as both kinds exist from the middle ages). Probably a medieval sword maker produced an unsharpened sword--which could then be used for much needed practice--and only was sharpened up for serious battle. Modern (real) sword makers do the same.
Since a knight's quality sword of the middle ages was known to have cost the price of a house... $260 up to a couple thousand dollars today, can be seen as a great bargain!
Personally, I got into swords through an Australian website called the Sword Buyer's Guide (www.sword-buyers-guide.com ) They have some 10% discount coupons available there (and on 300 dollars $30 is nothing to sneeze at) and the guy running it seems very knowledgeable without being a snob--as some sword collectors certainly are. He specializes in the under $300 variety of real, usable swords.
Honestly, I bet his expertise has something to do with the hideous government gun-grabbing now prevalent in Australia. In these uncertain times, besides guns, I actually do think having a real sword around isn't a bad idea.
The best places to look at swords online are actually NOT the manufacturers/wholesalers sites above, but at dealers--who often have the latest models and at better prices. Cult of Athena and Arms of Valor are considered a couple of excellent dealers, where you can see all the various brands--however they do sell junk wall hangers as well as real tempered ("battle ready") swords.
Thanks
Thank your literal God that your children are not allowed to pray publicly, your teachers are not allowed to instigate prayer but that your kindergardener can learn all about the joys of homosexuality. And your teenager can procure free condoms. It was horrible to tax secularists for schools that had a place for God, but quite okay to tax Christians for atheistic/anti-theistic institutions. You are most welcome to your public schools, can I just have my money back?
Are you saying that I support those other things? Remember—the topic of my post was restricted to creationism as non-science.
Cracks me up every time! Thanks for the belly laugh!
Thank you for the more accurate quotation. That was over a decade ago.
He is saying there are separate spheres of inquiry, but not denying the validity of either.
The ‘brainwashing’ in this instance was to surround this text fore and aft with interpretations which made it difficult for students to examine the text alone, and seemed to seek to create an anachronistic mindset which caused the student to simply say “ah, separation of church and state, now I understand,” turn off his brain and absorb an amorphous sense of how science has steadily triumphed over superstition and we are all better off for it.
But the confession which Galileo had made was not considered adequate (how could it have been?), neither by the members of the Holy Office nor by Urban VIII. Therefore, in order to ascertain Galileo's true intention, there was nothing left but, "the way of convincing him with reasons", that is, to be exact, the rigorous examination. But even in this rigorous examination there remains after all something of the "benign": torture will only be threatened, not actually applied. - Fantoli, op. cit., pg. 441
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.