Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Generals Seek to Reverse Obama's Iraq Withdrawal Decision (are generals revolting on obama??)
IPS ^

Posted on 02/03/2009 2:59:49 PM PST by chevydude26

WASHINGTON, Feb 2 (IPS) - CENTCOM commander Gen. David Petraeus, supported by Defence Secretary Robert Gates, tried to convince President Barack Obama that he had to back down from his campaign pledge to withdraw all U.S. combat troops from Iraq within 16 months at an Oval Office meeting Jan. 21.

But Obama informed Gates, Petraeus and Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen that he wasn't convinced and that he wanted Gates and the military leaders to come back quickly with a detailed 16-month plan, according to two sources who have talked with participants in the meeting.

Obama's decision to override Petraeus's recommendation has not ended the conflict between the president and senior military officers over troop withdrawal, however. There are indications that Petraeus and his allies in the military and the Pentagon, including Gen. Ray Odierno, now the top commander in Iraq, have already begun to try to pressure Obama to change his withdrawal policy.

A network of senior military officers is also reported to be preparing to support Petraeus and Odierno by mobilising public opinion against Obama's decision.

Petraeus was visibly unhappy when he left the Oval Office, according to one of the sources. A White House staffer present at the meeting was quoted by the source as saying, "Petraeus made the mistake of thinking he was still dealing with George Bush instead of with Barack Obama."

Petraeus, Gates and Odierno had hoped to sell Obama on a plan that they formulated in the final months of the Bush administration that aimed at getting around a key provision of the U.S.-Iraqi withdrawal agreement signed envisioned re-categorising large numbers of combat troops as support troops. That subterfuge was by the United States last November while ostensibly allowing Obama to deliver on his campaign promise...

(Excerpt) Read more at ipsnews.net ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bho2009; bhodod; centcom; democrats; iraq; obama; petraeus; timetable; troopwithdrawal; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-192 next last
"A White House staffer present at the meeting was quoted by the source as saying, "Petraeus made the mistake of thinking he was still dealing with George Bush instead of with Barack Obama."

This quote is striking of the arrogance of Obama as if he knows more than Patreus who brought victory in Iraq...

1 posted on 02/03/2009 2:59:49 PM PST by chevydude26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chevydude26

There’s an inherent conflict here. The military’s objective in a war is to win. Pres. Obama’s objective is to withdraw the troops. He’s trying to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.


2 posted on 02/03/2009 3:01:40 PM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chevydude26

Oh Oh Oh!!! I want to be a fly on the wall when Petraeus is told “I won”!


3 posted on 02/03/2009 3:02:40 PM PST by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chevydude26

I saw something where the Joint Chiefs were not happy about Obama wanting to close Gitmo.

Our military should NOT end up getting killed to play “catch and release” with Islamic terrorists to make a guy named hussein happy.


4 posted on 02/03/2009 3:02:46 PM PST by Frantzie (Boycott GE - they own NBC, MSNBC, CNBC and Universal. Boycott Disney - they own ABC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chevydude26

Our generals are going to mobilize the people in a coup against the president?

TREASON!


5 posted on 02/03/2009 3:03:39 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chevydude26

If push comes to shove, can a General, or Generals, force the CIC to be removed from duty?


6 posted on 02/03/2009 3:04:20 PM PST by CaribouCrossing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chevydude26

Zero’s jealous because Petraeus received a standing ovation at the Super Bowl


7 posted on 02/03/2009 3:04:20 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (The Libertarian and Constitution Parties should merge into one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chevydude26
Don't the Joint Chiefs have a responsibility to remove any threat to the US Constitution and the safety of our Country and doesn't this also include the possible removal from office the sitting president of the United States should that person choose to ignore the seriousness of their actions?

Is what I am saying making sense? I seem to remember that is in some oath our commanding officers take when they are promoted.

Enlighten me please.

8 posted on 02/03/2009 3:06:23 PM PST by The Anti-One (So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

“Our generals are going to mobilize the people in a coup against the president?

TREASON!”

Really? What part about defend the constitution against all enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC...” do you not understand”

Frightening isn’t it? Perhaps we have a president who is an enemy. Just a thought.


9 posted on 02/03/2009 3:06:43 PM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

Patraeus was probably told that that Obama’s and his party holds the purse strings. They are already cutting 10% from the defense budget and they can make it more.


10 posted on 02/03/2009 3:06:56 PM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

No, the American president chooses not to listen to his military experts.


11 posted on 02/03/2009 3:07:05 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

When does a President’s actions become treason?


12 posted on 02/03/2009 3:08:37 PM PST by Sacajaweau (I'm planting corn...Have to feed my car...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote
Perhaps we have a president who is an enemy. Just a thought.

IslamObama...

13 posted on 02/03/2009 3:08:43 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

Lest anyone get the wrong impression from my comments, we must remember that - as a group - there’s a hell of a lot more integrity in our generals than there is in the president’s cabinet.

Just contrast Sully, the USAFA grad and hero pilot, with the Obamaloon, the Harvard law grad.

QED


14 posted on 02/03/2009 3:09:21 PM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: The Anti-One

“Keane, the Army Vice-Chief of Staff from 1999 to 2003, has ties to a network of active and retired four-star Army generals, and since Obama’s Jan. 21 order on the 16-month withdrawal plan, some of the retired four-star generals in that network have begun discussing a campaign to blame Obama’s troop withdrawal from Iraq for the ultimate collapse of the political “stability” that they expect to follow U.S. withdrawal, according to a military source familiar with the network’s plans. “

This guy was under Clinton. A lot of people not happy right now.


15 posted on 02/03/2009 3:10:23 PM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CaribouCrossing; Tublecane

Petraus, or any other general, is either giving advice or taking orders. Today he gave advice to the CIC. If the CIC decides against that advice, he can give his general an order. Petraus can either accept the order, or resign. Pretty simple really.

Of course the reality is that Obama probably doesn’t have the political capital to withstand a Petraus resignation. Obama’s fan club will applaud, but everybody else will suddenly sit up & take notice.


16 posted on 02/03/2009 3:10:26 PM PST by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: chevydude26

“A network of senior military officers is also reported to be preparing to support Petraeus and Odierno by mobilising public opinion against Obama’s decision.”

I believe this is against the UCMJ.
Sedition

being undertaken to counter subversion by a probably constitutionally ineligible arrogant jackass of a cinc.

What have we gotten ourselves into???


17 posted on 02/03/2009 3:11:24 PM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaribouCrossing

Generals are loath to enter this process. They generally keep their mouths shut if they disagree with a POTUS.

IMO, this will be done on the QT. They are not going to want to be seen as objecting to the President. In fact, it is of concern that this story is being presented this way.

It’s almost as if someone is building a case for lopping off some heads, so to speak.

The generals serve at the will of the president. They do not have any power up against the president short of a coup. That would be a very ugly thing, something I wouldn’t advocate.

The people have spoken. Unless public opinion ran so negatively against Obama that Congress would take action, he’s the boss. And even then they would have to prove where he had broken the law to do it. He would have to be guilty of ‘high crimes or misdemeanors.’

I don’t think Congress removes him without them, and we’ve seen it doesn’t remove him with them in certain instances.


18 posted on 02/03/2009 3:11:47 PM PST by DoughtyOne (D1: Home of the golden tag line: FBI cuts off CAIR for contact with Hamas, Obama wants to talk to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

19 posted on 02/03/2009 3:12:36 PM PST by Diogenesis (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

He has a third choice. He can go to the people and express concerns about what he is being ordered to do. It might get him in serious trouble but ......


20 posted on 02/03/2009 3:13:45 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-192 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson