Posted on 02/03/2009 11:52:39 AM PST by dascallie
No. 08-570 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- PHILIP J. BERG, Petitioner, v. BARACK OBAMA, et al., Respondents. --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari Before Judgment To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Third Circuit
"A potential constitutional crisis under President Barack Obama now looms more and more with each passing day. This Court must recognize that its duty to the nation and to the law in the instant case is far greater than that duty which Chief Baron Pollock faced in Byrne v. Boadle. "
(Excerpt) Read more at wthrockmorton.com ...
Roughly equivalent to getting our money back if he is left in office.
----
Send treats to the troops...
Great because you did it!
www.AnySoldier.com
Globe:
BREAKING NEWS! The Shocking Secrets That Could Destroy Obama’s Presidency!
It’s the story every American needs to read! Barack Obama is hiding eight shocking secrets that could destroy his presidency before it even gets off the ground, political insiders say. In a blockbuster Special Report, insiders rip the lid off the scandals about where Obama was REALLY born, his sex life, drug abuse and the mysterious past he’s hiding from the world.
The new President has artfully dodged some of the most serious questions ever posed to a Commander-in-Chief. But top political leaders are demanding answers NOW - and the mounting pressure could trigger a firestorm that will bring down his administration. Don’t miss a single word - only in GLOBE!
Kind of strains credibility to accept references to websites like:
“But the flaws in this birth certificate are
so substantial, and so obvious, that it strains credibility
to accept it as such. See the petitioners web site:
http://www.obamacrimes.com/ and the Petition for a
Writ of Certiorari at pp. 16-17.”
being used to make the point in a brief to the SCOTUS! I wonder if any lawyers in the crowd can comment of the “professionalism” of using references to the Internet to base one’s legal arguments upon?
I wonder where people get this idea that "Obama has spent millions" on this. One does not have to spend money to not defend himself in a lawsuit and no Court to date has required him to answer any of the suits brought against him. Has his defense team even had to file any motions in these cases? If so, there should be some public record of the "millions of dollars" that legal work people claim he has spent. Is there even one motion filed by Obama's legal firm in these cases.
I wonder where people get this idea that "Obama has spent millions" on this. One does not have to spend money to not defend himself in a lawsuit and no Court to date has required him to answer any of the suits brought against him. Has his defense team even had to file any motions in these cases? If so, there should be some public record of the "millions of dollars" that legal work people claim he has spent. Is there even one motion filed by Obama's legal firm in these cases.
They suffer from more than that.......
LOL!!!
I stole it from google.
Problem witht that statenment is it wasn’t his BC, it was a cert of live birth.
The premise is false. He hasn't spent millions, and he has produced the document. The birther mythology isn't about facts.
You're referring to the "professionalism" of the Obama defenders; the internet references being the birth certificate that first appeared on Daily Kos and Factcheck, allegedly sourced from one of Obama's campaign hacks. Correct?
P.S.
Please see my post #46.
Huh?!?!?! Daily Kos and Factcheck produced "the document", not Obama.
You were told incorrectly. He only needs to be born a citizen. If he's born in the US, his parent's citizenship doesn't matter.
Where did they get if from?
The “Certificate of Live Birth” is a birth certifcate.
Fact: The document produced was altered (redacted cert number
Fact: As stated on the document, any alterations void the cert.
Question: If the document was indeed valid, why would the cert number be redacted?
To verify we did indeed have the correct document, we contacted the Hawaii Department of Health, which maintains such records.
Its a valid Hawaii state birth certificate, spokesman Janice Okubo said June 13, 2008, after we e-mailed her our copy.
The Hawaii Department of Health receives about a dozen e-mail inquiries a day about Obamas birth certificate, spokesman Okubo said.
I guess the big issue thats being raised is the lack of an embossed seal and a signature, Okubo said, pointing out that in Hawaii, both those things are on the back of the document. Because they scanned the front you wouldnt see those things.
Okubo says she got a copy of her own birth certificate last year and it is identical to the Obama one we received.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/jun/27/obamas-birth-certificate-part-ii/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.