[4FreeSpeach]

Kind of strains credibility to accept references to websites like:

“But the flaws in this “birth certificate” are
so substantial, and so obvious, that it strains credibility
to accept it as such. See the petitioner’s web site:
http://www.obamacrimes.com/ and the Petition for a
Writ of Certiorari at pp. 16-17.”

being used to make the point in a brief to the SCOTUS! I wonder if any lawyers in the crowd can comment of the “professionalism” of using references to the Internet to base one’s legal arguments upon?

[Fredgoblu]

I wonder if any lawyers in the crowd can comment of the “professionalism” of using references to the Internet to base one’s legal arguments upon?

You're referring to the "professionalism" of the Obama defenders; the internet references being the birth certificate that first appeared on Daily Kos and Factcheck, allegedly sourced from one of Obama's campaign hacks. Correct?

[Polarik]

being used to make the point in a brief to the SCOTUS! I wonder if any lawyers in the crowd can comment of the “professionalism” of using references to the Internet to base one’s legal arguments upon?

Really? That's exactly what Obama's high-priced lawyers did in their Motion to Dismiss: they referenced Factcheck, an Internet-based, Soros-funded Obama pimping site, the bogus image scan they posted on the Internet, and the bogus photos they posted on the Internet.

"Stupid is as stupid does."