Posted on 02/03/2009 11:52:39 AM PST by dascallie
No. 08-570 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- PHILIP J. BERG, Petitioner, v. BARACK OBAMA, et al., Respondents. --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari Before Judgment To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Third Circuit
"A potential constitutional crisis under President Barack Obama now looms more and more with each passing day. This Court must recognize that its duty to the nation and to the law in the instant case is far greater than that duty which Chief Baron Pollock faced in Byrne v. Boadle. "
(Excerpt) Read more at wthrockmorton.com ...
It is to Polarik.
"Tthis picture is your proof that haloing or ringing is not proof of photo shoping because we can still see some green pixels between the letters in a couple of areas....."
No, as I've repeated over and over, I am not trying to prove anything about the ringing.
"sure the green will show up in open areas but it is those ringed or haloed areas where the photoshopping reveals itself....."
Tell it to Polarik. You keep trying to insert your own pet issue into this, *BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT I WAS TALKING ABOUT*.
If you want to write up something to prove your theory about the ringing, go right ahead. Just stop trying to insert it into a discussion of something different and act like that's what was being discussed.
I know you didn’t try to prove anything but you did.
You proved my point for me and in such a way that anyone can see it if they just bothered to look at this thread you keep bumping.
so keep bumping it for me and I’ll keep telling you that you inadvertently proved my point and are too oblivious to realize what you have done.
You proved that Obama’s CoLB was photoshopped.
As I said, if you want to explain your theory about ringing go right ahead. Even if you want to claim that somehow my pictures help prove whatever your point is, feel free. Just stop pretending that it has something to do with what I was writing.
Oh I will and I’ll use your proof as my best example that Obama’s CoLB was photoshopped.
Yes, nice find. Now, shift your interests elsewhere while you still have a shred of sanity left! That’s what I’m going to do!
NICE JOB MLO, glad you finally came around and began to help. Hope you don't get in trouble or or dismissed for aiding and abetting the enemy. :P
Catch up on the reading. usmcobra misunderstood what was being discussed.
From all the withering criticism the DailyKooks received over their Obama COLB it's a wonder why they did not rescan their image to improve it. But in all probability, the DailyKooks.org did not have anything to scan in the first place so they could not.
From all the withering criticism the DailyKooks received over their Obama COLB it's a wonder why they did not rescan their image to improve it. But in all probability, the DailyKooks.org did not have anything to scan in the first place so they could not.
I offered an image for discussion, in post 295. Just so I know exactly what image(s) your are referring to, could you specify? I will indeed look again.
LoL! ;-)
This one, "Yes, nice find." Your reference to post 365.
This one, "Yes, nice find." Your reference to post 365.
I was asking for the specific image that you say shows "the haloing around the text images on Obama's COLB".
I was asking for the specific image that you say shows "the haloing around the text images on Obama's COLB".
Go find Polarik's final analysis thread you'll see them there.
OK thanks, I have those. They were the reason I posted 295, but maybe I should do a side-by-side, that is actually a good idea.
In the spirit of complete candor, or possibly laziness, I am going to claim that I would have to look into it more in order to opine. I had thought that a frequent use of the word "halo" in quotes would have drawn someone into the discussion who could have done some of the heavy lifting on this aspect (there really is a surfeit of them out there). In other words, I know enough general theory to be alert, and some relevant experience, but not enough specific experience with JPEG/MPEG so make a declaration with authority. That said, the (concept of and) term ringing is common in many signal processing (and other) problems, and comes to mind quickly when you see stuff like I posted at 295. Is that weaselly enough for you :)
And probably more than one person, too-—either that or he has no life and is an insomniac. Have you ever noticed the hours he keeps?
My good man! I’m delighted that you identify with our faction here but please don’t apply that DU epithet to our group. It’s your right to call yourself whatever but I find it about as tasteful as rappers using the N word.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.