Posted on 02/03/2009 11:52:39 AM PST by dascallie
No. 08-570 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- PHILIP J. BERG, Petitioner, v. BARACK OBAMA, et al., Respondents. --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari Before Judgment To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Third Circuit
"A potential constitutional crisis under President Barack Obama now looms more and more with each passing day. This Court must recognize that its duty to the nation and to the law in the instant case is far greater than that duty which Chief Baron Pollock faced in Byrne v. Boadle. "
(Excerpt) Read more at wthrockmorton.com ...
Don’t post to me. I have no interest in anything you have to say.
You are absolutely right and I will be good from now on! I’m too busy anyway...
That's why you will not figure out what is real. It doesn't happen by deciding in advance what you want to believe.
If you post to me or about me I will respond.
And if you say things that aren't true I have the right to challenge them.
The allegedly improper BIRTH image can be recreated by simply superimposing the black letters along with the white ringing artifact over a part of the background without any printing. This should not be possible, according to Polarik, because if we don't erase the underlying image first we aren't removing any green pixels, and our replication should have more green between the letters.
First, using Photoshop use the selection tools to select the letters in the word BIRTH and then expand that selection around each letter. This is to capture the white ringing around the letters.
That gives this image. This is pasted onto a red background so you can see where it is transparent.
Now take that image and paste onto an unprinted area of the certificate. Theres plenty of unused space. Right under the source BIRTH will work fine.
Position the pasted in letters so that they line up with the green hash marks just the same as the original BIRTH does. Left edge of B just touching the vertical mark, right edge of the H just touching the vertical mark, base of the word over the horizontal mark. Aligned just like the original. The original is on top, the copy on the bottom.
Now if Polariks is correct, there should be some extra green in between these letters. Because to make this, we didnt go erase any old lettering and replace it. Thats what is supposed to account for the missing green. Does that happen? Is there more green in our newly printed BIRTH than in the original BIRTH? Lets bring up the color for a good look.
No, there is no missing green in the original (top) BIRTH. Just like the bottom version, the white comes from being printed on a white part of the paper, and the pixelization from the ringing artifact.
I don't know what sort of proof you are trying to prove here but.....
All you actually did was repaste a copy the original paste job back into the image.
AS I see it you have proved that the text on obama's COLB can be pasted into place with the same results you say are not possible.
you may want to delete your pictures so people won't see that you actually proved what you have said could not happen did.
And, as for "ringing" artifacts causing the pixel patterns I found, I made that up. It's just my way of separating the wheat from the chaff.
Obviously. Read it again carefully.
What it demonstrates is that there are no missing green pixels. The green between the letters is exactly what should be expected once you take into account the background and the fringe around the letters.
Lousy comeback actually. It missed the whole point.
"And, as for "ringing" artifacts causing the pixel patterns I found, I made that up."
You are saying you made up something? Care to elaborate?
What it demonstrates is that there are no missing green pixels. The green between the letters is exactly what should be expected once you take into account the background and the fringe around the letters.
if you start with an image with a halo and you paste a copy of that same image along with it's halo how could you not get anything but an image with a halo?
the two BIRTH's are identical right down to the exact same grey pixels in the bottom of the B and the top of the R.
You have proved for us what I have suspected all along the entire text was first typed out on a white background , selected where the white halo would still appear around the entire text because of the small size of the lettering and pasted intact onto a blank form.
Give a troll enough rope, and he’ll hang himself. But, only after we tell them how to make the noose first. Trolls are so-o-o dumb.
Thanks to YellowRoseofTx who heard the following message on PlainsRadio.
[Adding it here because there’s no other place to put it.]
“”Subpoenas have been served to several Obama people today (Feb. 5)
As per President Bush’s January 16th, 2009 Executive Order ,
The Office of Personnel Management has been served:
Michael W. Hager, Office of Personnel Management
1900 E. Street, NW, Washington, DC 20415
List of subpoenas can been viewed at the main website download page.””
http://www.defendourfreedoms.us
[The link to List of Subpoenas is shown at bottom of first document, second article.]
mlo you may think you are right but there are things that people know that are NOT being said on this forum. You can count on that. the puzzle is almost complete. You aren’t going to like the outcome.
Give a troll enough rope, and hell hang himself. But, only after we tell them how to make the noose first. Trolls are so-o-o dumb.
Sitting here LMAO!! you are so right! How funny is this?
Subpoenas have been served to several Obama people today (Feb. 5)
I can’t find the list. Who was served besides Hager?
Ah, link is at top of document. Here it is.
http://defendourfreedoms.org/downloads.html
Then look for:
Subpoenas issued to date:
Batch 1
Batch 2
Bump Dat...
I can see the grids fall in different places with respect to the letters, but I’m afraid I’m way behind as to what it implies about the document.
Help those of us who are interested but ignorant of document analysis?
The doctor who delivered him is on record as having delivered him in Hawaii.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Doctor? Really? This is the first I’ve heard that!
Link please, because the only place this doctor exists is in your head.
I should be more precise - I can see that the first two images are identical, or nearly so, in where the gridlines fall. The third is different, and the fourth different from the third and the first two images.
I’ll still welcome help as to what that implies about the document, though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.