Posted on 01/22/2009 9:15:37 PM PST by Sammy67
On December 5, 2008, we said: "Questions have been raised as to whether Chief Justice John Roberts could administer the oath of office to a man who he believes may not be entitled. Chief Justice John G. Roberts will have to KNOW that Barack Hussein Obama II is eligible to 'enter on the execution of his office,' before he administers the Inaugural Oath of Office.'" The Chief Justice of the United States did not make a mistake when he flubbed the oath of office. He did not want to issue the oath to Obama because of his doubts. By failing to issue the oath in exactly the manner prescribed by the Constitution, Roberts deliberately created a constitutional issue that Obama was not duly sworn in as
(Excerpt) Read more at americanpatrol.com ...
he's not some junior at yale running for treasurer of skull and bones!!!
The oath is actually meaningless in any legal way. Power transferred with or without an oath
Maybe. I doubt it was a conscious error though
This is just a tad far-fetched, don’cha think?
Roberts has more class than to intentionally pull a dumb trick like that. It was a mistake. Nothing more and nothing less.
You MUST be kidding. That is ridiculous. Thinking that Roberts would stoop to some fraternity prank is an absolute insult to the man.
Yes there probably are serious legitimate questions about the Obomanation being a true “natural born citizen,” but this post is far past “tin-foil hat” nut-case conspiracy theory territory...
Oh, please....
File this under "Beyond Whack-a-doodle-e-ity"...
Thanks for posting the article.
This Glenn Beck is getting a bit imaginative in his ‘detective’ work.
Can’t we forget this ‘osammy boy’?
I mean, how many still remember who the new VP is? (how many libs/dems/etc)
I say the public (and especially the minority here on FR) will be better off once we get back to dealing with the fact that WE are the only ones who will SAVE us.
Power may have transferred in a de facto sense, but constitutionally speaking, he was not president until he recited the oath in full.
NO. The writer is full of horseObama.
I believe he did do this on purpose. Way to go CJ Roberts.
HAHAHAHAHA I just put a folder on my desktop with that name. I have no idea what I’ll put in it but HAHAHAHAHA what a GREAT name. Thanks!!! hehe
They haven’t obeyed the Constitution in quite a while.
“You MUST be kidding. That is ridiculous. Thinking that Roberts would stoop to some fraternity prank is an absolute insult to the man.”
He had his fingers crossed while administering the oath.
The Chicago Bammer has absolutely no authority over any Supreme Court justice. He’s as powerless as I am.
(grin)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.