Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Astonishing DNA complexity demolishes neo-Darwinism
CMI ^ | Alex Williams

Posted on 01/13/2009 6:40:50 PM PST by GodGunsGuts

The traditional understanding of DNA has recently been transformed beyond recognition. DNA does not, as we thought, carry a linear, one-dimensional, one-way, sequential code—like the lines of letters and words on this page. And the 97% in humans that does not carry protein-coding genes is not, as many people thought, fossilized ‘junk’ left over from our evolutionary ancestors. DNA information is overlapping-multi-layered and multi-dimensional; it reads both backwards and forwards; and the ‘junk’ is far more functional than the protein code, so there is no fossilized history of evolution. No human engineer has ever even imagined, let alone designed an information storage device anything like it. Moreover, the vast majority of its content is metainformation—information about how to use information. Meta-information cannot arise by chance because it only makes sense in context of the information it relates to. Finally, 95% of its functional information shows no sign of having been naturally selected; on the contrary, it is rapidly degenerating! That means Darwin was wrong—natural selection of natural variation does not explain the variety of life on Earth. The best explanation is what the Bible tells us: we were created—as evidenced by the marvels of DNA—but then we fell and now endure the curse of ‘bondage to decay’ by mutations...

(Excerpt) Read more at creationontheweb.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: a; alexwilliams; c; cmi; codesuponcodes; creation; crevo; dna; encode; encodeproject; evolution; g; intelligentdesign; journalofcreation; junkdna; metainformation; naturalselection; neodarwinism; nervecode; oldearthspeculation; polanyi; regulatorycodes; replicationcode; t; transcriptioncode
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-204 next last

1 posted on 01/13/2009 6:40:51 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Finny; vladimir998; Coyoteman; allmendream; LeGrande; GunRunner; cacoethes_resipisco; ...

I decided to post this as its own thread. Enjoy!


2 posted on 01/13/2009 6:43:53 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Are you kidding me? All that complex DNA stuff happened randomly, pure chance. Everything in the universe that appears to have design is just a “fortunate accident”.


3 posted on 01/13/2009 6:44:01 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CottShop

Did I ping you to this?


4 posted on 01/13/2009 6:44:40 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

More BS about ID.


5 posted on 01/13/2009 6:44:55 PM PST by MimirsWell (Scipio Pakistanus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Perhaps it appears to be designed for a reason :o)


6 posted on 01/13/2009 6:45:12 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
That means Darwin was wrong...

More pure B.S. from the irreducible complexity moonbats.

7 posted on 01/13/2009 6:45:34 PM PST by Rudder (The Main Stream Media is Our Enemy---get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

I highly recommend the book, “Cosmic Codes”, by Chuck Missler.

As this new information confirms, DNA is holographic. That is, the information is encoded and distributed throughout the medium.

But not only is DNA likely holographic, but so our brains may be also.

The Bible exhibits holographic properties.

But even more startling, even our entire reality, what we perceive as the “physical” universe, may be a hologram.

Niels Bohr said that the only thing Quantum Physics has going for it is that it is undeniably correct.


8 posted on 01/13/2009 6:48:08 PM PST by Westbrook (Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MimirsWell

Actually, if you check my recent posting history, you will find that he has written three papers back to back (to include this one) that are absolutely devastating to naturalistic evolution. And btw, he’s a Young Earth Creationist, not an IDer. However, he does think that nature screams intelligent design (notice I didn’t capitalize). You need the Bible to graduate from ID to YEC.


9 posted on 01/13/2009 6:48:51 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jeremiah Jr
The traditional understanding of DNA has recently been transformed beyond recognition. DNA does not, as we thought, carry a linear, one-dimensional, one-way, sequential code—like the lines of letters and words on this page. And the 97% in humans that does not carry protein-coding genes is not, as many people thought, fossilized ‘junk’ left over from our evolutionary ancestors. DNA information is overlapping-multi-layered and multi-dimensional; it reads both backwards and forwards; and the ‘junk’ is far more functional than the protein code, so there is no fossilized history of evolution. No human engineer has ever even imagined, let alone designed an information storage device anything like it. Moreover, the vast majority of its content is metainformation—information about how to use information.

From "Creation on the Web"

So close, and yet...

10 posted on 01/13/2009 6:49:18 PM PST by Ezekiel (Strange things are afoot at the Circle K.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rudder

> More pure B.S. from the irreducible complexity moonbats.

My, how informative you are.

Perhaps you can supply us with an intelligent refutation of the information provided in the article rather than schoolyard namecalling and unsupported assertions.


11 posted on 01/13/2009 6:50:06 PM PST by Westbrook (Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

I’ll look it up. Thanks for the tip. I love Missler on prophecy. I didn’t realize that he branched out into science (although, I seem to recall that was his occupation before he went into full-time ministry).


12 posted on 01/13/2009 6:50:48 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

> I didn’t realize that he branched out into science
> (although, I seem to recall that was his occupation
> before he went into full-time ministry).

Chuck Missler is an engineer and was one of the principal technologists at the Jet Propulsion Labs before giving his life to Christ.


13 posted on 01/13/2009 6:53:13 PM PST by Westbrook (Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Rudder

I would like to challenge you to read the paper linked to this post, and then the two papers written by Williams linked to the following post...and then try and tell me it’s moonbatery.

PS Williams maintains that all life (not just bacterial flagellums and blood clotting cascades) is irreducible to natural causes. And as far as I can tell, his arguments form an airtight case against naturalistic evolution (and for intelligent design). Trust me, he goes way beyond Behe.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2163122/posts


14 posted on 01/13/2009 6:56:35 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

I knew it had something to do with the sciences. I’m looking up his book right now. Thanks again—GGG


15 posted on 01/13/2009 6:58:06 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
You've really hit it big this time. Not even pretending to do science; there is nothing but religious apologetics in this article.

Why don't you post these in the Religion Forum? They would be much more appropriate there?

16 posted on 01/13/2009 7:00:32 PM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

Because all of God’s creatures deserve to know what science tells us about the glory of God’s creation.


17 posted on 01/13/2009 7:03:12 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Job 5:9
He performs wonders that cannot be fathomed, miracles that cannot be counted.


18 posted on 01/13/2009 7:07:51 PM PST by Red Badger (I was sad because I had no shoes to throw, until I met a reporter who had no feet.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Amen to that! Thanks for that wonderful verse my brother :o)


19 posted on 01/13/2009 7:09:21 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Rudder

> moonbats

I don’t appreciate that.


20 posted on 01/13/2009 7:17:46 PM PST by old-ager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-204 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson