Posted on 01/12/2009 10:21:48 AM PST by Jack Black
Pennsylvania attorney Phil Berg, who filed the first lawsuit on whether President-Elect Barack Obama meets the constitutional qualifications for president, had had two requests pending in the U.S. Supreme Court, both called Berg v Obama. On January 12, the U.S. Supreme Court again denied Bergs request for injunctive relief. Bergs alternate request, that the Court take the case for full review, is on the January 16 conference. Odds are extremely high that it will also be denied, but that wont be known until January 21. The Court is closed on January 19 and January 20.
No, they aren't. They have denied every challenge to Obama's eligibility to be POTUS. This is a fundamental constitutional issue that is the substance of their function. If they deny these cases, for ANY reason, without verifying that Obama meets the minimum requirements, they have adbicated their responibility.
Their entire function is to interpret law based on the Constitution. If they don't/won't hear any of these challenges to Obama's eligibility based on his birth certificate, they aren't doing what we pay them for.
What do these plates have that Barry doesn't?
Give up?
A Certificate of Authenticity!!!!
If Obama is legitimate, then they could help him by actually hearing this case and having Hawaii send the Birth Certificate. Not doing so just says they know he isn't eligible, but by sticking their fingers in their ears, pinching their noses and shutting their eyes, the boogey man will hopefully go away. They are afraid of mob violence. They are weak and now our Constitution is weak. It is a sad day for our Republic.
So they just need to call you and find out how to do their jobs?
That's just because they haven't had you to tell them what to do. Imagine the nerve of them to think that they know how the Constitution and the judicial system should work.
Odds are....no one dares question The One about anything.
Yup.
The Justices will “Conference” on January 16 (as stated) and again January 23 over this Obama non-citizenship issue.
With who?
What I can’t understand is the total blackout of even a discussion by our conservative icons on the whole subject . . . I just don’t get it. This is monumental . . . horribly important and so controversial . . . what gives?
Where are Rush, Hannity, FoxNews, NewsMax, Weekly Standard, Mark Levin, Ann Coulter, Bill Bennett, etc. etc. etc.
It’s like we’re whistling in the wind. Not even a whimper or even a mention . . . what the hell is going on?
Absolutely amazing . . . Absolutely bizarre!
“Where are they? They could be in line for a bail out. Fox is supposedly being bought (partially) by the Saudis “
That still doesn’t answer why there’s been a total conservative blackout both on the radio, tv, and newsprint . . . After all, Ann Coulter (and I love her dearly) is supposedly a Constitutional lawyer . . . why NO COMMENT WHATSOEVER anywhere, anyplace, at any time.
All the other controversial crap about Obama was thrashed so thoroughly these past couple years, but NOTHING ABOUT THIS! NOTHING! Apparently, Rush, Levin, and Hannity (et al) are screening ALL CALLS to eliminate anything about this attack on our constitution. I don’t get it!
Sounds like it should be a SLAM DUNK! Do they know something that we don’t?
“Sounds like it should be a SLAM DUNK! Do they know something that we dont?”
Maybe they believe President-Elect Obama meets all the constitutional qualifications to be president. And this stuff is Tinfoil Hat territory.......Just saying.
Ref.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2163242/posts
33 posted on Monday, January 12, 2009 9:42:00 PM by laweeks
The only explanation I’ve heard for the conserv pundits to ignore this issue is that they have come to recognize that
certain events had to take place in order to hold BO to rights.
No efforts to put this issue forth prior to the election got any traction.
And pushing the issue was against the “kid glove” republican approach to this election.
[this is much more a condemnation of the RNC and McCain than it is the conserv media in that said media was given nothing to work with. The evidence was not well digested at this point. And very few wanted the tin hat label without some cover (or at least acknowledgement) by the RNC/conservative leaders]
After the election, realize the following had to take place in order to establish plaintiffs (those hurt) and defendants(BO et al)...
- The electors have to certify BO and Plugs. In spite of efforts to educate, the electors as a group, blindly accepted the tainted evidence of eligibility.
- The congress had to certify the elector votes. Again, in spite of efforts to recruit honorable reps and sens to legitimately question, NO HONORABLE REPS OR SENS WERE FOUND!
This is probably the most disturbing logical conclusion.
Meanwhile several lawsuits were brought, denied, rejected, appealed and BO’s phantom position was represented in at least some by expensive law firms. And many rightly question why this tactic would be taken rather than simply producing a $10.00 document.
Still no food for the conservative pundits to hang on at this point.
Now....
We have multiple cases before the supreme court in various stages and with various dates of consideration.
Each case has some merit - if you have followed this issue. But none contend that they have solid evidence of wrongdoing. All require the production of back documentation of BO’s legitimacy (cause NO ONE knows who this clown really is!!!)
Getting the documentation “right now” doesn’t disqualify BO simply because there must be a court debate about both the evidence and the constitutional presidential requirements.
However, BO knows there are constitutional issues involved(he claims expertise in this area) and realizes that he could be forced to produce documentation at some point.
So, BO can...
1. Withdraw now under some silly excuse.
2. Release everything and hope for the best.
3. Persist, be sworn in, and hope for no exposure - ever.
4. Persist, be sworn in, and perjure himself.
And there are a couple of other possibilities....
1. All discovered documentation is complete, valid,
and completely aboveboard.
2. All discovered documentation has been swept clean
and cannot be exposed for years or ever.
Judge Roberts is forcing the issue.
He will swear in Obama on Jan. 20. Why not?
He knows, as do the other justices, the issues and the ramifications - but not necessarily all the facts.
He knows that Obama’s inauguration will either be valid or perjured.
If, upon consideration of the cases filed and to be filed, Obama is “clean”, all has been done properly under the constitution.
If, any filed cases should cause the release of information that causes eligibility to be REJECTED, Obama has committed perjury and BO as POTUS is invalid.
If Obama has committed perjury/fraud, his standing is invalid and, in essence, he never
became president. Some submit that certain circumstances would result in his expulsion as an illegal alien but that is dependant on documentation not yet available.
If Obama has not committed perjury, then his fraud can continue just subject to random
citizen cases claiming he was never eligible in the first place.
BIG NOTE
Obama only commits perjury if he accepts the oath of office from Judge Roberts!
(provided of course that he is indeed the fraud that many rightly contend)
Therefore, it is a good thing to hail the inauguration and wish well blah, blah, blah.
And enjoy the precise mechanizations of the Supreme Court aka Judge Roberts.
TO THE ORIGINAL QUESTION
.
Where are they? They could be in line for a bail out. Fox is supposedly being bought (partially) by the Saudis
That still doesnt answer why theres been a total conservative blackout both on the radio, tv, and newsprint . . . After all, Ann Coulter (and I love her dearly) is supposedly a Constitutional lawyer . . . why NO COMMENT WHATSOEVER anywhere, anyplace, at any time.
All the other controversial crap about Obama was thrashed so thoroughly these past couple years, but NOTHING ABOUT THIS! NOTHING! Apparently, Rush, Levin, and Hannity (et al) are screening ALL CALLS to eliminate anything about this attack on our constitution. I dont get it!
Sounds like it should be a SLAM DUNK! Do they know something that we dont?
33 posted on Monday, January 12, 2009 9:42:00 PM by laweeks
Bottom line is that Rush/Hannity/Beck and others dont do investigative journalism. Their business is fronting known facts and issues to their audience plus commentary.
As some would say
They got no ammo in their magazines.
Its kinda unfair to blame them for the lack of facts surrounding
Baracks tremendous farce.
The Supreme Court is fixin to load those mags.
It will then be up to our favorite commentators to
lock, load,
aim, and fire.
Have faith.
Like my Dad told me
.
they always get theirs in the end
Kinda simple but (in my experience) true.
I would bet that if a true long form Birth certificate exists anywhere, it would be in a vault in Indonesia where Barry was formally adopted by Lolo Soetoro. If he ever came back formally to Hawaii and re-upped his U.S. citizenship, then the documents from Indonesia would also be in the HI vault attached to the original birth cert from probably Kenya. Anything in Kenay or Indonesia cannot be trusted for provinance since mooselimbs and commies infest both cultures, as well as totally corrupt politicians. [Which remnds me, I ownder if sinkEmperor got intel from Riady connections shwoing Barry is not a U.S. citizen even.]
Was none. His momma had a Kenyan mid-wife. Was that a trick question?
Jim, why does this sort of baiting crap continue to be tolerated?
BTW, a great piece of analysis!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.