Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Freepers Please - Stop posting on these silly Clinton...
01/06/2009 | Responsibility2nd

Posted on 01/06/2009 9:13:31 AM PST by Responsibility2nd

... Charges that he has had extra-marital affair. So what? Who cares?

I know I'm a little bit late on posting this vanity and I know that some people may read into this thread more than I intended but here goes.

I just wish that all the Freepers posting negative remarks about Bill Clinton's sexual escapades would just shut up.

The next time I see some Freeper post yet another news story regarding the rumors of Clinton's infidelity, I'm gonna go find and post a picture of the "Aw Jeez" guy.

Don't you know that any and all of the articles you post regarding the Paula Jones/Jennifer Flowers sex scandal allegations make us all look like tin-foil hat wearing conspiranoiacs? Why don't we focus on the real issues? It's not like these personal matters would ever lead to anything - like an impeachment trial - anyway

Besides, Clinton has denied all these rumors and even Factcheck.org has proven that he is innocent. So please… the next time you feel the need to post a thread regarding his birth certi…. er, I mean his sexual infidelities, just don't do it.

They don't matter.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; colb; cultureofcorruption; democratscandals; dnctalkingpoints; drudge; eligibility; enquirer; globe; lamestreammedia; mattdrudge; rinobullies; satire; vanityinanity; whereisrush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: stockpirate

Is that poster the one who tried preaching Bible lessons that the poster wasn’t even familiar with while trying to use them analogously and got called on his/her abject ignorance of the Bible?


61 posted on 01/06/2009 10:30:20 AM PST by papagall (Atta boys are great to collect, but one dagnabit wipes out dozens of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: mlo
"Here's another idea.."

Share it with your liberal friends.


62 posted on 01/06/2009 10:34:32 AM PST by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Just so I have it straight.

You’re telling the people who tell you to shut up...to shut up?

The privilige you have to post and comment on FR that which you desire allows critics the same opportunity. It’s funny how people who post on a public, open and free bulletin board get their panties in a wad when...SHOCK...other people post comments not to their liking.


63 posted on 01/06/2009 10:40:21 AM PST by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Nice booby trap, you seem to have caught a few.


64 posted on 01/06/2009 10:46:27 AM PST by kanawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

“Yes, I hit it. Actually, them. Like a Tijuana mule. Several times. And Obama’s birth thing? If there were anything at all to that, we would have used it on him. Heck, if it were even plausible BS, we would have used it on him. Without a second thought. We’re shameless scumbags. You of all folks know that.’

65 posted on 01/06/2009 10:48:35 AM PST by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

“Clinton has denied all these rumors and even Factcheck.org has proven that he is innocent.”

Well now that makes it different, since he’s denied everything AND you mentioned FactCheck.org has claimed his innocence too I guess that’s good enough for me :)

NOT
JB


66 posted on 01/06/2009 10:48:59 AM PST by thatjoeguy (Just my thoughts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

BTW - This difference of opinion is not between competing issues, it’s between those that want to follow every possible opportunity to knock the dems on their arse (nothing wrong with that in theory) and those that would like FR to have some credibility in the political community by focusing it’s efforts on what’s demonstrably legitimate and factual.

I fall into the second category but then FR might not be nearly as successful and popular. The Enguirer sells millions of copies every edition for a reason and that reason transcends political boundaries.


67 posted on 01/06/2009 10:51:26 AM PST by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT

Just did a search on factcheck for “Juanita Broaddrick”. Nothing came up?


68 posted on 01/06/2009 10:59:30 AM PST by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

In post # 63 you said.... Just so I have it straight.

I was gonna reply that no.... I don’t think you have it straight.

But as I read your post # 67 I see that you get it. And that you are one of the Obamabots who think that our questioning Obama’s birth certificate is little more than tabloid gossip that belongs in the Enquirer.

Well guess what? It was the Enquirer who had the stones to break the John Edwards story when the Dems had put a restraining order on the rest of the MSM.

And if The Enquirer and the British press are gonna be the only ones to keep this issue alive - along with Free Republic - then great!

Sorry if that offends you.


69 posted on 01/06/2009 11:01:14 AM PST by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: papagall

“Is that poster the one who tried preaching Bible lessons that the poster wasn’t even familiar with while trying to use them analogously and got called on his/her abject ignorance of the Bible?”

Yes. He seems to have fallen off a cliff after several of us dealt with him.


70 posted on 01/06/2009 11:03:07 AM PST by stockpirate (To each according to their needs, (bailout) from each according to their ability(bailout funds))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Well, I also find it funny when posters compain that others are not “getting” their comments as comments to them are flying over their heads.


71 posted on 01/06/2009 11:12:22 AM PST by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

Comment #72 Removed by Moderator

To: Brutus509

73 posted on 01/06/2009 11:17:59 AM PST by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
If I knew how to post that I'd do it all the time! Just love it to death! They would eventually ban me. Anyone who has read my posts might identify me as a morbid cynic; pretty close but not quite. I find the world around me to be hilariously depressing and that is why I spend a lot of time conversing with the characters ‘tuther side of the looking glass - very refreshing.
74 posted on 01/06/2009 11:43:49 AM PST by Eighth Square
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #75 Removed by Moderator

To: TruthWillWin
Just did a search on factcheck for “Juanita Broaddrick”. Nothing came up?

Larry Sinclair does not exist either, according to FactCheck.

76 posted on 01/06/2009 12:38:12 PM PST by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: weegee

lol that’s great


77 posted on 01/07/2009 8:04:58 AM PST by nominal (Christus dominus. Christus veritas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson