Skip to comments.
Judge: Birth papers to list 2 fathers
The Advocate ^
| Dec 28, 2008
| JANET MCCONNAUGHEY
Posted on 12/28/2008 3:31:38 PM PST by chemicalman
NEW ORLEANS A same-sex couple in California has won a federal court ruling that their adopted sons Louisiana birth certificate must bear the names of both adoptive fathers.
The facts are so clear that no trial is needed, U.S. District Judge Jay Zainey wrote.
Louisianas Office of Vital Records must give full faith and credit to the New York State court in which Oren Adar and Mickey Ray Smith of San Diego adopted the boy, he ruled Monday. The office had refused to issue a birth certificate listing both as the boys legal parents. The state could appeal the decision.
Adar and Smith said they have practical and emotional reasons for wanting both of their names on the birth certificate of the boy, identified only as J.C. A.-S.
(Excerpt) Read more at 2theadvocate.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: 2sick4words; gay; homosexualadoption; homosexualagenda; louisiana; neworleans; ruling; sicksicksick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
I wonder if Obama has 2 fathers on his birth certificate?
Guess we'll never know, because we'll never see it.
To: chemicalman
You forgot the Barf alert.
2
posted on
12/28/2008 3:34:18 PM PST
by
Westbrook
(Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
To: chemicalman
emotional reasons for wanting both of their names on the birth certificate of the boyOooooh! Emotions!
3
posted on
12/28/2008 3:34:18 PM PST
by
SolidWood
(Sarah Palin - Everything that is Sweetness and Light!)
To: chemicalman
As an adopted child myself, I understand the need a child has to feel like he or she belongs, Smith wrote. I remember as a child wanting to see my own birth certificate and to see my parents listed because it gave me a sense of belonging, a sense of identity and a sense of dignity. This doesn't make sense. The kid is never supposed to figure out the lie? There's obviously a woman in the picture somewhere.
More nonsense brought about by how someone feels. Now I feel sick.
4
posted on
12/28/2008 3:37:08 PM PST
by
FoxInSocks
(B. Hussein Obama: The Paucity of Hope)
To: chemicalman
"The facts are so clear that no trial is needed, U.S. District Judge Jay Zainey wrote"
Well, the fact that Jay Zainey is a jackass is pretty clear to me.
5
posted on
12/28/2008 3:37:49 PM PST
by
Psycho_Bunny
(ALSO SPRACH ZEROTHUSTRA)
To: FoxInSocks
This doesn't make sense. The kid is never supposed to figure out the lie? There's obviously a woman in the picture somewhere. Of course, it makes sense to them. They are going to raise him as if this two father thing is normal and hope the kid becomes gay too so that he too, will see having two men listed as his parents as normal.
6
posted on
12/28/2008 3:45:09 PM PST
by
raybbr
(It's going to get a lot worse now that the anchor babies are voting!)
To: Psycho_Bunny
Judge Jay Zainey - I Just Knew He Would Look Like This.
7
posted on
12/28/2008 3:48:57 PM PST
by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: chemicalman
that kid is goiing to turn out fine...
8
posted on
12/28/2008 3:52:33 PM PST
by
lnzog
(I'm from Illinois and I apologize.)
To: chemicalman
one upped the immaculate conception/virgin birth...no mother
To: Red_Devil 232
10
posted on
12/28/2008 3:58:03 PM PST
by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: chemicalman
Of course, a child’s birth certificate should be all about the non-birth parents. Never mind that some genetic medical problem may turn up and the person and his doctors won’t have the truth to work from.
11
posted on
12/28/2008 3:59:18 PM PST
by
skr
(May God confound the enemy)
To: Red_Devil 232
Yeah, but do you have a picture of his husband?
To: chemicalman
To: Red_Devil 232
Seeing people like that makes me soooo glad I’m not young any more. Let me out of this place.
14
posted on
12/28/2008 4:03:08 PM PST
by
Past Your Eyes
(Some people are too stupid to be ashamed.)
To: chemicalman
Birth certificate for an adopted son when neither "parent" has a blood tie???
15
posted on
12/28/2008 4:04:10 PM PST
by
NonValueAdded
(once you get to really know people, there are always better reasons than [race] for despising them.)
To: chemicalman
The facts are so clear that no trial is needed, U.S. District Judge Jay Zainey wrote. The fact is, Judge Jay Zainey, that the child was born of a woman. A woman carried the child in her womb for approximately 9 months and then gave birth. A birth certificate should include the name of the mother and the name of the father. Anything else is utter nonsense! To state otherwise confirms that Judge Zainey has a disordered mind. When will adult supervision arrive in this country?
16
posted on
12/28/2008 4:04:10 PM PST
by
olezip
To: olezip; All
When you adopt, the birth certificate has the adoptive parents name on it, not the birth mothers and not the actual father.
The error here is back in New York where the adoption was even allowed. The judge, unfortunately I believe, has the law on his side.....God forgive us all.
To: olezip; All
Opps, California not New York.....should’a known that it would come from California.
To: chemicalman
A same-sex couple in California has won a federal court ruling.... Same-sex as definitive.
Bye Bye common sense for lack of direction has infiltrated our court system.
19
posted on
12/28/2008 4:21:18 PM PST
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, Question everyone else)
To: lnzog
20
posted on
12/28/2008 4:25:00 PM PST
by
onedoug
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson