Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL Thousands advise electors to check eligibility
WND ^ | December 13, 2008 | WorldNetDaily

Posted on 12/13/2008 10:31:50 AM PST by ckilmer

If documents some day prove Barack Obama is not eligible to be president under the U.S. Constitution, none of the 538 Electoral College members who vote him into office Monday will be able to claim ignorance.

That's after 3,653 citizens had enough concern over the allegations, they participated in a WND effort to deliver letters to every elector, urging them to investigate.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: artbell; avanity; bho2008; birthcertificate; blackhelicopters; certifigate; csection; obama; obamatruthfile; rinobullies; rubberroom; scotus; sos; tenfoilhats; tinfoilers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-225 next last
To: Balata

Thank you. A bona fide troll, yes. And a really dumb one, to boot.


181 posted on 12/27/2008 7:51:12 PM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Balata

Here’s the link
http://lonestarconservative.blogspot.com/


182 posted on 12/27/2008 7:51:20 PM PST by Balata ("Truth surfaces when FReeRepublic is engaged."-Balata)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Balata

And another quote:

“A note to the CertifiTruthers:

Dear CertifiTruthers,

I have argued with you, especially on FR, on numerous occasions, but I don’t really want to argue with you about whether the COLB is real or fake or what Barack’s granny said or any of that other garbage right now. I’m right, you’re wrong, that’s all there is to it.”


183 posted on 12/27/2008 8:07:32 PM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Balata; WinOne4TheGipper

Thanks for the link, Balata. Looks like Gipper is a wuss as well, because he doesn’t even answer my contention about constitutionalism on FR but does it on his own libtard website.

A note to the CertifiTruthers:

Dear CertifiTruthers,

I have argued with you, especially on FR, on numerous occasions, but I don’t really want to argue with you about whether the COLB is real or fake or what Barack’s granny said or any of that other garbage right now. I’m right, you’re wrong, that’s all there is to it.

What’s really got me ticked off is that, every time you encounter someone who doesn’t drink the CerifiTruther Kool-Aid, you start going on about how that person “doesn’t care about the Constitution”. One wonders whether you might be so willing to throw out such a serious charge to someone who has lost limbs defending that document, but while such fantasies would indeed be ironic, they don’t apply in my case.

However, there is a reality that is just as ironic, and you probably haven’t even stopped to realize it. That reality is that it is not us who are trashing the constitution, it is you. Yes, yes, in the midst your faux rage over a pretended controversy, you are trying your best to keep from office the duly elected president of the United States!

In conclusion, the Constitution might be in better shape if you guys would quit using it as a shield every time someone rips into your conspiracies.

Thank you,
LoneStar(temporarily trapped in Oklahoma)Conservative


184 posted on 12/27/2008 8:08:30 PM PST by Kevmo ( It's all over for this Country as a Constitutional Republic. ~Leo Donofrio, 12/14/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo; little jeremiah

You’re welcome Kevmo!

These guys seem to be “one trick ponies”. They want us to prove a negative. LOL!


185 posted on 12/27/2008 8:18:56 PM PST by Balata ("Truth surfaces when FReeRepublic is engaged."-Balata)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: WinOne4TheGipper

Yes, yes, in the midst your faux rage over a pretended controversy, you are trying your best to keep from office the duly elected president of the United States!
***See, now, Gimper: Obama isn’t the president yet. He’s the president elect. And the 20th amendment states explicitly that the PE may not qualify for office. So while you’re throwing your own faux rage around, expend a little bit on the framers of the constitution themselves. I can see why you don’t want to post such dribble on FR, because it gets hacked to pieces quickly and you have nothing left but your own brazen trollhood.


186 posted on 12/27/2008 8:25:17 PM PST by Kevmo ( It's all over for this Country as a Constitutional Republic. ~Leo Donofrio, 12/14/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Balata

They use that ploy because the assumed mental level of their intended demographic—obamanoid sycophants—does not comprehend the fallacy of demanding proof of a negative. It is an arrogant condescension toward Obama voters in the final analysis, assuming they can be deceived on into perpituity, unable to see through the lies and deceit upon which Obama has ridden these worshipful dupes into this affirmative action demand for power. The same arrogant condescension will be driving these same operatives to demand rioting if the fraud is exposed and prevented from affirmative action ascendency. They might be surprised though ...


187 posted on 12/27/2008 9:42:47 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Oh my, I had better correct my spelling before asshat-gipper comes along and focuses on that to stroke his childish ego:

perpituity = perpetuity ascendency = ascendancy Bwahahahahahaha

188 posted on 12/27/2008 9:51:46 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

You’re right, that ploy doesn’t work here.

Speaking of BC’s, some of us on FR may have been born at night, but it wasn’t last night. LOL!


189 posted on 12/27/2008 10:22:15 PM PST by Balata ("Truth surfaces when FReeRepublic is engaged."-Balata)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: WinOne4TheGipper
“Logic is my only tool, truth is my only goal.”

That’s lie #1... If truth were your only goal you wouldn’t be so involved in spreading a demonstrable lie.

"Demonstrable lie" huh? Demonstrate it. Produce a single piece of documentation that indicates Obama is a natural born citizen. The burden of proof is on you, and you are being crushed by it, right here in front of God and everyone.

You better make sure you get that pre-paid Visa from the Obama Campaign quickly, before they stop handing them out to the FR agitprop apparatchik brigade you're part of, tool.

190 posted on 12/28/2008 6:09:42 AM PST by TonyStark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: TonyStark

One thing that all these 0bamanoids have in common is that they use words as though words have no real meaning; they can employ language to mean whatever THEY want it to mean. Which is very often the exact opposite of the real meaning. It’s just another example of no absolute foundation of reality, no objective reality, create your own “truth” and all that associated garbage. The extreme example (well, there are worse ones) of double standards.

A non-related example of double standards - Bush used to drink to excess, and that is still being pounded upon by leftists. But 0bama admitting to smoking weed and even using crack? nothing, dead silence, crickets chirping. Any interest as to whether he still uses? Crickets chirping.

They are all criminally insane. Leftist belief systems are mentally and spiritually crippling.


191 posted on 12/28/2008 12:13:52 PM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

One thing that all these 0bamanoids have in common is that they use words as though words have no real meaning; they can employ language to mean whatever THEY want it to mean.
***Commonly known as Humpty Dumpty usage... “When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said in a rather a scornful tone,”it means just what I choose it to mean”


192 posted on 12/28/2008 12:23:03 PM PST by Kevmo ( It's all over for this Country as a Constitutional Republic. ~Leo Donofrio, 12/14/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Exactly! Is that in one of the Alice books? They always gave me the creeps when I was a kid.


193 posted on 12/28/2008 12:38:58 PM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
"As long as one parent is a US citizen, a person is born a citizen."

What does that have to do with anything?

The folks who are upset about Obama's eligibility or lack thereof are not concerned with "citizenship." They are concerned with whether he is a "Natural Born Citizen" which is a more narrowly defined category than "citizen." And having a citizen mother does NOT make one a "Natural Born Citizen."

194 posted on 12/28/2008 12:45:53 PM PST by cookcounty ("A ship in harbor is safe, but that's not why the ship is built." ---Governor Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WinOne4TheGipper

Where’s the court record, dude?


195 posted on 12/28/2008 6:45:16 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: bvw

Where’s the court record, dude?

Conspiracy nut to English translation:

I STILL have no evidence that Obama was born in Kenya, Indonesia, or Timbuktu, so let me continue with insisting that we focus on a distraction.

Like I said, there has to be SOME reason that you think Obama wasn’t born in Hawaii. The longer you delay in providing real evidence, the more it looks like that reason is extremely petty partisanship and nothing more.


196 posted on 12/29/2008 9:05:31 AM PST by WinOne4TheGipper (Why do foul-mouthed conspiracy theorists who can't back up their ideas think that I belong at DU?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: TonyStark
As much as you wish it weren't the case (since you know that you have no case, the burden of proof is on you. Maybe if I type this in large letters, you might finally get it:

YOU ARE MAKING A SERIOUS ALLEGATION (THAT THE PRESIDENT-ELECT OF THE UNITED STATES IS INELIGIBLE FOR THAT OFFICE). USUALLY, WHEN SOMEONE MAKES A SERIOUS ALLEGATION AGAINST SOMEONE, IN THIS COUNTRY, AT LEAST, THEY HAVE THIS STUFF CALLED "EVIDENCE". YOU HAVE NOT SHOWN ANY EVIDENCE, AND INSTEAD DEMAND THAT THE PERSON YOU ARE ACCUSING PROVE HIS "INNOCENCE", YOU IGNORE AND LIE ABOUT THE EVIDENCE THAT YOU HAVE SEEN (THE COLB), AND EXPECT EVERYONE ELSE TO BE AN EXTREME HACK LIKE YOU. AIN'T HAPPENING.
197 posted on 12/29/2008 9:17:54 AM PST by WinOne4TheGipper (Why do foul-mouthed conspiracy theorists who can't back up their ideas think that I belong at DU?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: WinOne4TheGipper
*You* posted a link to a blog entry about a court case that look's as if it is a total invention, a fraud. You claimed that court case settled the issues about Obama's qualification under the natural born clause. *You* have been unable to back up your own claim by a reference to actual court records, which are public records.

Where's the court records?

198 posted on 12/29/2008 9:19:15 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: WinOne4TheGipper

Are you that lonely?


199 posted on 12/29/2008 9:20:59 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: WinOne4TheGipper; TonyStark
YOU HAVE NOT SHOWN ANY EVIDENCE, AND INSTEAD DEMAND THAT THE PERSON YOU ARE ACCUSING PROVE HIS "INNOCENCE", YOU IGNORE AND LIE ABOUT THE EVIDENCE THAT YOU HAVE SEEN (THE COLB), AND EXPECT EVERYONE ELSE TO BE AN EXTREME HACK LIKE YOU. AIN'T HAPPENING.

Poor, poor fellow. No one's talking about guilt or innocence but about qualifications for a position and a refusal to demonstrate those qualifications. The very act of refusing to demonstrate the qualifications is a serious matter. In applying for many, many jobs, such stonewalling would result in one's application being immediately put through the shredder and one's being shown the door. In addition, falsifying documents (the KOS COLB) and failure to answer questions truthfully or fully (the Illinois Bar application) would also be grounds for a no-hire or a dismissal and possible prosecution.
200 posted on 12/29/2008 9:25:05 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-225 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson