Replies

They use that ploy because the assumed mental level of their intended demographic—obamanoid sycophants—does not comprehend the fallacy of demanding proof of a negative. It is an arrogant condescension toward Obama voters in the final analysis, assuming they can be deceived on into perpituity, unable to see through the lies and deceit upon which Obama has ridden these worshipful dupes into this affirmative action demand for power. The same arrogant condescension will be driving these same operatives to demand rioting if the fraud is exposed and prevented from affirmative action ascendency. They might be surprised though ...

187 posted on 12/27/2008 9:42:47 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)

Oh my, I had better correct my spelling before asshat-gipper comes along and focuses on that to stroke his childish ego:

perpituity = perpetuity ascendency = ascendancy Bwahahahahahaha

188 posted on 12/27/2008 9:51:46 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)

You’re right, that ploy doesn’t work here.

Speaking of BC’s, some of us on FR may have been born at night, but it wasn’t last night. LOL!