Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Suit contesting Barack Obama's citizenship heads to U.S. Supreme Court Friday
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-obama-birth-certificatedec04,0,491374.story ^ | December 4, 2008 | malkee

Posted on 12/04/2008 12:37:19 AM PST by malkee

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's election. The meeting of justices will coincide with a vigil by the filer's supporters in Washington on the steps of the nation's highest court.

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; donofrio; obama; obamatruthfile; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
The word is getting out.
1 posted on 12/04/2008 12:37:20 AM PST by malkee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: malkee

Good luck!


2 posted on 12/04/2008 12:38:32 AM PST by Anita1 ("The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malkee
Five more suits, all later dismissed, were filed in Hawaii by a person who is currently suing the "Peoples Association of Human, Animals Conceived God/s and Religions, John McCain [and] USA Govt." The plaintiff previously sought to sue Wikipedia and "All News Media."

Sounds like a real stable fella.

3 posted on 12/04/2008 12:57:45 AM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malkee

Anyone expecting them not to throw out the case is just setting themselves up to be disappointed.

However, I will be very surprised and pleased if they don’t.


4 posted on 12/04/2008 1:08:28 AM PST by couchpotatoxxx12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: couchpotatoxxx12

I’ll be satisfied if it gets a fair review on the constitutional level.


5 posted on 12/04/2008 1:24:49 AM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: malkee

If liberal judges can ignore or spin with impunity the clear text of the main laws of the US Constitution,bypassing “technicalities” like presidential requirements is kids stuff.

All it takes is a blind hatred of traditional America.


6 posted on 12/04/2008 2:33:21 AM PST by Happy Rain ("I hope Mr. Obama will be a great president--but then again I also hope to lose 30 pounds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malkee

Whatever happens, people will know in the future that eligibility will be examined.

IMO that’s a damn good thing... no matter the outcome of this particular case.

...just sayin....


7 posted on 12/04/2008 2:37:21 AM PST by Principled (They used the CRA to undermine capitalism. They're using ACORN to undermine democracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Principled

Yes, it is a good thing. But what do we do now? This is our only hope.

I don’t have much faith either regarding the Supremes, but I will tell you one thing, I have never been so angry regarding an election as I have with this one. It just wasn’t right in so many ways.

This man has no business sitting in the oval. He lied and cheated and used various voter fraud methods while the people in charge stood by and did nothing, and now we are supposed to just say oh well and step into line.

Not to mention that this man may not even be eligible to hold the position and we are supposed to just sit there and say nothing realizing we the people are at the mercy of these people?

No NO and NO!!! If this man is allowed to assume the oval office, I will no longer participate in the elections. I will know with absolute certainty that it is all a sham.

By allowing this, we are saying to foreign born persons hell yes run we will not do anything about it because the voters wanted it and the Constitution be damned.

I knew this was coming, but now that I am witnessing the death nell for the Republic that I and you all here at FR love it just breaks my heart.

I am also very very angry with our so called conservative voices, Rush, Laura et al. They are not brave enough to come out and talk about this. THEY ARE COWARDS!!! How dare they sit in judgement of others who keep silent when they do exactly the same.

When they ask us for help with the Fairness Doctrine, you can count me out!!


8 posted on 12/04/2008 2:53:58 AM PST by waxer1 ( Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Principled

Principled said: Whatever happens, people will know in the future that eligibility will be examined.

If eligibility didn’t matter a month ago, what makes you think it will ever matter? The precedent was set on Nov. 4, 2008.


9 posted on 12/04/2008 3:00:33 AM PST by KingLudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Principled

Heck, if he gets away with this, the whole Constitution is meaningless (which is what he thinks it is anyway).

That said, I think he will get away with it. I would be truly stunned if the Supreme Court decided to examine this case.

Obviously, however, Obama is a little worried about it, which is why he is consolidating power so rapidly and trying to stay in the eye of the media (and hence, in the eye of his mob of brain-dead followers, just for insurance purposes). And probably the reason he is appointing so many Clintonistas is because many folks in the upper ranks of the Dem party know that he’s not eligible and just on the off chance that he gets booted, they want their apparatus in place.

That said, I don’t think there’s a chance in the world that the SC is going to examine this. The case involves three people, and they could theoretically find that none of them, including McCain, qualified as natural born. This might be a solution, but I think they won’t dare to touch it.


10 posted on 12/04/2008 3:10:25 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: malkee

It won’t go anywhere, no one has the balls to light the fuse.


11 posted on 12/04/2008 3:15:44 AM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malkee

Interesting that they say those interested in the lawsuit are ‘opponents of Obama’s election’ rather than ‘defenders of the Constitution’.


12 posted on 12/04/2008 3:19:05 AM PST by smartymarty (When you know why you believe what you believe, leadership is inevitable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malkee

If hitler and tojo had of known how easy it is to subvert the constitution,,,,,,,,,even the supremes woulda helped them.


13 posted on 12/04/2008 3:20:16 AM PST by Waco (understand the meaning of illegal???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malkee

And if we weren’t all so busy working trying to keep our own selves out of debt - we could all show up outside the Supreme Court bldg tomorrow in protest.


14 posted on 12/04/2008 3:21:24 AM PST by smartymarty (When you know why you believe what you believe, leadership is inevitable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

He’s been elected now. Why on earth won’t he make his real birth certificate available? It’s beyond me that there is no one in his entourage who has explained to him that he is only fanning the flames by refusing!

How can you trust the guy? He acts guilty.


15 posted on 12/04/2008 3:44:54 AM PST by Everydayiwritethebook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: livius
many folks in the upper ranks of the Dem party know that he’s not eligible

Given the tight control of information that has characterized O's campaign, I'm not so sure they "know," as much as they suspect, in spite of all the lockstep blather. With the possible exception of Hillary. And what she might know could be something entirely unrelated to the question of citizenship, or "natural born."

I agree with your take on this situation, and given that his supporters are now quoting the opinion of the Circuit Court judge in the (ill-conceived and executed) Berg case, to the effect that the voters decide the qualifications of the President, it's one more nail in the coffin of Constitutional authority.

And I can't help wondering if that's been O's objective all along with this issue.

16 posted on 12/04/2008 3:48:10 AM PST by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: waxer1

I have always thought that Rush hurt himself badly by carrying water for GWB long after it was clear that GWB was no friend of conservatives.


17 posted on 12/04/2008 3:54:24 AM PST by Theodore R. (The most frightening words in the English language: The American people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KingLudd

The difference I point out King is that before Nov 4, nobody had ever made an issue whatsoever of a pres’ eligibility in this regard.

Now that this is happening [at minimum a full review - albeit a likely denial] future nominees must consider that it could happen to them.

That’s all.


18 posted on 12/04/2008 3:54:24 AM PST by Principled (They used the CRA to undermine capitalism. They're using ACORN to undermine democracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: browardchad
And I can't help wondering if that's [undermining the authority of the Constitution' been O's objective all along with this issue.

I think it probably is. If this issue is allowed to slide, why not any issue? The Constitution becomes simply a general guideline which may be honored or not, depending on how convenient it is for the people in power.

19 posted on 12/04/2008 4:06:12 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: malkee
Yes, how low was the helicopters flying last night???
20 posted on 12/04/2008 4:08:55 AM PST by org.whodat (Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson