Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Buyer's Remorse on the Left
American Thinker ^ | November 26, 2008 | Janice Shaw Crouse

Posted on 11/26/2008 6:07:55 AM PST by vietvet67

One after another, we are learning the names of the future Obama Administration. Behold, they are not new faces, nor are they the change agents that Obama's campaign rhetoric promised. Instead, we are seeing Clinton retreads and a surprising move toward the political center. Rather than the far left team of new faces and new politics that the President-elect's supporters dreamed about when they cast their ballots for the "change" they could believe in, we are seeing familiar faces and experienced pols. More than a few Obama fans are experiencing buyer's remorse as they discover that "The One" seems to be abandoning them and their policies.

When confronted with the far left's disappointment over the first appointments to be announced, one of the Transition team members responded, "An Obama White House will be focused on meeting the next challenge, not winning the next election."

Well, that response does not pass the laugh test! Or perhaps the correct translation is, "We're so sure we'll win the next election, we don't even have to take that into consideration."

Clearly, Obama intends to be more than a one-term president; even before his Inauguration, he is already starting his next campaign. He is putting his chief competition, Senator Hillary Clinton, safely inside his camp and working to dispel any evidence that he is an extremist. Rather than come in and clean house, the President-elect seems to be embracing politics as usual.

The "insult" added to previous "injury" came with an announcement over the weekend that Obama's White House will continue the political office that was held by Karl Rove in the Bush White House. During his campaign, of course, Mr. Obama vowed to keep politics out of the White House. He criticized the Bush Administration for its partisanship and accused President Bush of running a "perpetual campaign." The Obama Administration, he promised, would end what he called "politics as usual."

But he is appointing the usual -- a bevy of inside-the-beltway politicians.

Thus far, there are no new faces and no one who will obviously push for new policies. Eric Holder (nominee for Attorney General) and Rahm Emanuel (Chief of Staff) bring lots of Clinton-era baggage; Tim Gaithner (Treasury Secretary) is part of New York's big-money establishment. Tom Daschle, (HHS Secretary) is welded into the Senate's good ‘ole boy network. Further, Obama helped to protect Joe Lieberman's Senate committee chairmanship even though Lieberman crossed party lines to actively campaign for John McCain. The leftist Bible, The Nation, noted recently that "not a single, solitary, actual dyed-in-the-wool progressive" has even been mentioned for the Obama Cabinet.

The Far Left contends that Barack should be dancing with the ones that brought him to the White House. Those on the right who treasure our traditional America values of personal responsibility and freedom have far more serious cause for worry.

While Obama is filling top slots of his Administration with politicians from the center, his agenda will be thrust forward by the Schedule C minions in the lower levels of government who will be able to work under the radar to push his far left ideology. That is the bottom-up strategy that he learned as a community organizer and a strategy that links him with his primary season competitor, Hillary Clinton, who promoted the feminist goals of the Beijing Platform for Action through various task forces set up in the federal agencies following the U.N.'s Beijing World Conference on Women. Both of these leftist politicians have learned to speak the language of the masses while working behind the scenes on the policies of the radical true believers.

Thus, Obama's appointments are sending a signal that his administration will be far more hawkish than his campaign rhetoric indicated. In addition to the likely appointment of Senator Clinton as Secretary of State, there are other signs that President-elect Obama is changing his stance on the war in Iraq -- despite official assurances that his position on Iraq hasn't changed and won't change. He seems to be leaning toward retaining Robert Gates, President Bush's Defense Secretary. Also, he is leaning toward a McCain backer, General James Jones, former NATO commander, as National Security Advisor and Janet Napolitano, governor of Arizona and a supporter of the Iraq war, for heading the Homeland Security Department. These possible appointments appear to signal a weakening of his promise to withdraw troops over the next 18 months.

The possible appointment of Mrs. Clinton to the top foreign policy position also raises questions about the U.S. position on Iran and Israel. During the campaign, Senator Clinton held to a hard line regarding Iran and Senator Obama famously talked about sitting down to negotiate "without preconditions." Senator Clinton has been a steadfast supporter of Israel (not any surprise in light of her numerous Jewish constituents in New York) and some pundits think that she would aggressively pursue a Middle East peace deal if she were Secretary of State.

Beyond questions of policy, critics are concerned that Obama is shaping a third Clinton term. The sheer drama of appointing Hillary, with the added soap-opera potential of husband Bill's antics, is cause for apprehension to many of Obama's supporters who fear that his agenda will be overshadowed by the Clintons' egos.

To repeat: what Obama's critics are overlooking is that he is a former community organizer; he prefers to work under the radar, starting from the grassroots. Those who are looking at the top layer of the Obama Administration wanting to see a sign of the "second coming of Saul Alinsky" (as one blogger put it), are going to be disappointed. Those who watched First Lady Hillary Clinton set up little fiefdoms in all the government agencies to push the policies of the Beijing Platform for Action and those who observed Senator Barack Obama utilize ACORN to build a political machine that spread from Chicago throughout the nation will recognize the strategy and tactics of master manipulators.

Even though they differ on many other fronts, Barack and Hillary are kindred spirits when it comes to using the government's legendary "soft power" and the national "bully pulpit" to achieve their personal and political ends. So, while the nation is lulled into thinking that Barack is moving to the center, his minions who are actually carrying the water will be hard-core "progressives" moving the leftist agenda forward largely out of the public's sight in the mid-level management positions of the government's sprawling bureaucracy. Much of the real action will happen behind the scenes in thousands of small decisions and initiatives that will remain nearly invisible until -- like the explosion in the number of mother-only families that followed from Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty -- the transformation of their cumulative effects begins to emerge.

Janice Crouse, former presidential speechwriter for Bush 41, heads Concerned Women for America’s think tank and writes political and social commentary.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; bho2008; brokenpromises; buyersremorse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 11/26/2008 6:07:55 AM PST by vietvet67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vietvet67
Based upon Obama's sparse legislative voting record, there hasn't been a issue he voted on that wasn't from the left.

In other words it's way too early to start moving him to the center.

2 posted on 11/26/2008 6:11:55 AM PST by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AU72

And I wonder what Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Nation of Islam, and Jeremiah Wright are saying about their idol.


3 posted on 11/26/2008 6:13:22 AM PST by rovenstinez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

Change you CAN’T believe in.


4 posted on 11/26/2008 6:15:44 AM PST by Jack Hammer (here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rovenstinez
And I wonder what Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Nation of Islam, and Jeremiah Wright are saying about their idol.

Jesse Jackson might reconsider his threat.

5 posted on 11/26/2008 6:15:55 AM PST by pnh102 (Save America - Ban Ethanol Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

He hasn’t even gotten into office. It looks like the only thing that might save him from his supporters is that Bill Clinton plans to move into the white house at the same time.


6 posted on 11/26/2008 6:16:51 AM PST by Steamburg ( Your wallet speaks the only language most politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67
"Well, that response does not pass the laugh test! Or perhaps the correct translation is, "We're so sure we'll win the next election, we don't even have to take that into consideration."

Janice - that's exactly what they believe. Do you have any evidence to the contrary? And...if your answer is the GOP, that doesn't pass the laugh test.

7 posted on 11/26/2008 6:17:08 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67
More than a few Obama fans are experiencing buyer's remorse as they discover that "The One" seems to be abandoning them and their policies.

More than a few = a handful... The change and hope crowd is the same kind as those from 16 years ago who thought they were going to get free health care and a homosexual military. Right now they all still have the glaze over their eyes and smiles on their faces, just like 16 years ago.

8 posted on 11/26/2008 6:18:54 AM PST by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

Obama’s selections are all designed to lull the American public into even more complacency.


9 posted on 11/26/2008 6:19:08 AM PST by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

The agenda is still Marxist...more govt control, and more govt programs. The cuts will be military and defence. Not exactly something to make one complacent.


10 posted on 11/26/2008 6:22:36 AM PST by JaneNC (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67
I, for one, think we should give the new administration a break after all look how considerate they were during the start of the 2 Bush terms. ~sarc~
11 posted on 11/26/2008 6:22:42 AM PST by Larry381 (The White House soon will be filled with BO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

The war in Iraq is over. We won. It is not an issue. He doesn’t have to do a damn thing about it.

Janet Napolitano as Homeland Security? The war will be here before long.


12 posted on 11/26/2008 6:23:10 AM PST by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67
>> While Obama is filling top slots of his Administration with politicians from the center,

What a crock. They are only the “center” when viewed from the far left. The “center” has moved way too far left in the world of the MSM. And that to me is one of our basic problems.

13 posted on 11/26/2008 6:24:31 AM PST by ParadigmLost (Ayn Rand was right. - Atlas is going to shrug.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter; All
Obama’s selections are all designed to lull the American public into even more complacency.

We have a winner!

14 posted on 11/26/2008 6:26:01 AM PST by fortunate sun (Proud Palinista!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JaneNC

Perhaps a bad economy will shield us from the worst of it.

Imagine this Marxist with the economy of the 90’s as a tailwind.

Yes, he will institute policies that are Marxist and that will aid in the destruction of our traditional society. Yes, he will appease our enemies and cut our defense capabilities.

But I don’t think he’ll be able to “reform the economy” (ie, implement socialism wholesale) in the present condition of the economy.

It’s up to us to only buy essentials and not participate in propping up the economy. When you get your stimulus check, put it in a money market or something, not as a down payment on a big ticket item. Reduce your tax liability. Don’t fund the beast.


15 posted on 11/26/2008 6:26:05 AM PST by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67
When confronted with the far left's disappointment over the first appointments to be announced, one of the Transition team members responded, "An Obama White House will be focused on meeting the next challenge, not winning the next election."



"Always a line with these people."
16 posted on 11/26/2008 6:30:49 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (We'll give Obama the same amount of respect the left gave Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter
Obama's selections are nothing more than the typical "Community Organizer" heirarchy.

Hillary should logically get head OF Health etc....

Biden has already disappeared

These appointments appear to me to all be mismatches...

Something is very wrong IMHO.

17 posted on 11/26/2008 6:32:01 AM PST by Sacajaweau (I'm planting corn...Have to feed my car...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

IMHO...Hillary’s got his Birth Certificate...she got it late in the game....

http://blackliberal.wordpress.com/2008/10/20/hillary-clinton-and-obama-together-in-florida/


18 posted on 11/26/2008 6:33:09 AM PST by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67
While Obama is filling top slots of his Administration with politicians from the center, his agenda will be thrust forward by the Schedule C minions in the lower levels of government who will be able to work under the radar to push his far left ideology.

These are the actual morons we're going to have to be facing on a day-to-day basis for at least the next foru years as they fill up the bureaucracies of such things as the IRS, the EPA, DHS, TSA, etc.

19 posted on 11/26/2008 6:34:16 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

This just shows how people continue to allow themselves to be duped & actually believe political rhetoric. The whole slogan of change was just a typical cynical ploy which was used for electoral purposes. There is no way that the duopoly party rule will ever deviate from their own positions.


20 posted on 11/26/2008 6:35:07 AM PST by Republic_of_Secession.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson