Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Bashers - Just shut up
11/5/20008 | self

Posted on 11/06/2008 7:01:49 AM PST by ODDITHER

To the McCain staff and Republican Party leaders:

My family has been Republicans since before the civil war. One of my ancestors lived in Arkansas and is described as a Moral Abolitionist. Originally from South Carolina he brought his Family to North West Arkansas and started a community named The Lord’s Vineyard. Here he taught both his children and the slaves he brought with him as well as the slaves he inherited or bought in South Carolina to read and write. Once they reached 21 and were able to read and write and had learned a skill, he gave them a piece of property and helped them set up a business. He once said that his children were no more prepared to live in a world without slaves than the slaves were to have freedom. He is it was his duty to ensure that both could be free and successful. He created uproar when he gave one of his slaves a business before his son, because his son had not become sufficiently humble.

I believe through my family, I have earned the right to speak as a Republican and believe my thoughts reflect many other Republicans.

The McCain staffers who did not agree with Sarah Palin, would you please just Shut Up!! You must understand that most of America loved Sarah, she energized long time Republicans who like myself was not enamored with John McCain as the candidate. When he won, I had decided to sit this election out, I would vote for him because he was the lesser of two evils but I was not going to walk the streets and volunteer my time and money. Sarah changed that for me. I worked harder to get Senator McCain elected than I worked to get George Bush elected. If you’re an example of what the insiders in Washington have become, we deserved to lose!!!!

Americans are starved for someone that can clearly articulate our agenda of lower taxes, limited government, protecting the unborn children and our personal freedoms. Sarah Palin is that person and you are trying to destroy her. We will not allow that to happen, not this time. She will not become a George W Bush because you have hurt feelings. Our message was schizophrenic at best and liberal at worst. We must get back to being the party of ideas.

We must accept the fact that when liberals wage a campaign of personal destruction they win. They not only have the backing of the press but many in Europe. People who want to see American power in the world diminished back the liberal agenda because they know that liberals are the best avenue to destroying everything we hold dear. When liberals are forced to wage a campaign of ideas they lose. American values are center right not left. Every liberal that won, did not discuss issues but instead focusing on their opponent’s personal life and distorting their values. Republican’s who wage a campaign of personal destruction always lose.

If we move to the left, Americans will keep electing Democrats, we need to unite, and start presenting our party as the party of ideas and taking our case directly to the American people. We need every Republican united in that cause.

Shut up and get to work or get out of the way.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: palin; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 241-249 next last
To: joesbucks

Please STFU
Cheers


81 posted on 11/06/2008 7:34:29 AM PST by tiniyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

And neither will I.


82 posted on 11/06/2008 7:35:14 AM PST by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

A lot of people want to be loyal.

George W Bush has been our “leader” for eight years. People deep down, want to be loyal to their leader. Especially conservatives. Remember that crowd of firefighters that day, surrounding President Bush yelling “USA! USA! USA!”.

It’s like the Blue Angels. One leader, the rest flying in formation. If the leader flies into the ground...

That’s why there are so many RINO’s.

RINO “leaders” have convinced too many, that’s how to win.

Clearly that’s how to ... LOSE.

We need Sarah Palin in 2012. America needs her. And we need to beat mercilessly (rhetorically speaking of course) any so-called Republicans who have the unmitigated audacity to attempt to blame Sarah Palin for McCain’s LAME CAMPAIGN.


83 posted on 11/06/2008 7:35:59 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (PALIN 2012: No more RINOS... Ever!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: ODDITHER

My financial contribution to the party was sent to Sarah.
No Sarah no money. If the party doesn’t get straightened out they can forget me.


84 posted on 11/06/2008 7:36:44 AM PST by usslsm51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bartholomew Roberts

Thre’s no one spreading rumors about Governor Palin except the Dems.

And you’re (sadly) falling for it.


85 posted on 11/06/2008 7:37:24 AM PST by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Huck

Didn’r she say Roe v Wade?


86 posted on 11/06/2008 7:37:44 AM PST by KavMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Neverforget01
Were they all "smitten" or was her message of pro-growth, small government conservatism resonating?

Beats me. I think a lot of them were smitten. There was an election going on. The not-loved McCain was the candidate, and the vile Obama the opponent. People needed something to hang their hat on this year, and it was Sarah. Let's relax and see how she does over the next few years.

You can ignore her because she couldn't immediately come up with an answer on prior USSC decisions in 10 seconds

I'm not ignoring her. I'm saying that I accept her as a prospect, but not as the Anointed. I want to see competition. I want to see us try to find someone better, just because it's the smart thing to do.

I'd like a candidate who, for one, can make a strong case for a limited Constitution protected by justices who do not legislate from the bench. The ability to cite at least ONE example is not too much to ask.

87 posted on 11/06/2008 7:38:33 AM PST by Huck (Teddy Roosevelt vs. Che Guevera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: ODDITHER

Vanity posters can take their own advice.


88 posted on 11/06/2008 7:39:44 AM PST by bmwcyle (Primary support for McCain and Huck showed complete stupidity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JCISLORD

“””A better way to let your displeasure be known is to call the RNC office at 202-863-8500. Tell them to pass along your message to McCain to SHUT HIS STAFF UP. It is cowardly to let her take the fall for the loss. She is the one who energized the Republicans in America.”””

I just called the RNC Chairman’s office and asked them to ask the McCain staff and other Republicans to stop bashing Palin.

When you call the above number, hit “O” zero to get connected to the chairmans office.


89 posted on 11/06/2008 7:39:44 AM PST by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: tiniyo

Thank you. I’ve been thinking that for days.


90 posted on 11/06/2008 7:40:00 AM PST by redk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: John W
On the issue of Sara Plain, perhaps wake up would be a better admonition to you. It isn’t just disgruntled conservatives, Rommenyites and Huckabees trying to put the kabosh on her. It is the entire Washington establishment. This isn’t an accident. They fear her. Why? Because, she is “us” and they do not want “us” taking over or even stemming the tide of the direction this country is heading. Don’t fall for their bull.

Oh I'm fully awake, no worries there and I am in agreement with Governor Palin on 99 percent of issues, if not 100%. She compares favorably with Teddy Roosevelt so far as relative experience is concerned, and I would have no trouble voting for her at the top of a future GOP ticket.

My concern is that she will now be tainted by this lopsided defeat of McRINO, who now joins former President Bob Dole in the category "candidates who got the nomination because it seemed like it was 'their turn'"

Until the GOP engages our common leftist enemies with ferocity, total partisanship, and taking no prisoners, returns to the fundamental principles of Reagan conservatism, we will be on the outside looking in, or perhaps in the most worst case scenario on the inside (of an 0bama Reeducation Kamp) looking OUT.

Dark times are ahead for America.
91 posted on 11/06/2008 7:40:45 AM PST by mkjessup (0bama the President-elect? 'Reverend' Jeremiah Wright IS a prophet: God has just damned America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Huck
I think a lot of them were smitten

Perhaps they were drawn to her because of her conservative principles.

No one is anointing her. I believe the topic of this thread was how she is being blamed. We can throw another good conservative under the bus or we can admit McCain sucked. Our choice.

92 posted on 11/06/2008 7:45:17 AM PST by Neverforget01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter; Sherman Logan
Conservative values still represent the majority of Americans. The Marriage Amendment votes in Florida and California confirm conservative values win elections.

And especially the Social Conservative issue which is what Sarah represents as these votes and the same results in 2006 where conservative state-wide ballot measures passed as well, while the rudderless GOP lost.
93 posted on 11/06/2008 7:45:21 AM PST by SoConPubbie (GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ODDITHER

Amen.


94 posted on 11/06/2008 7:45:34 AM PST by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Once again, perfect response!


95 posted on 11/06/2008 7:46:20 AM PST by SoConPubbie (GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ODDITHER
I left the Republican Party or as I now call it “The Progressive Lite Party” and joined the Conservative Party. I did this because I know there are Conservative Democrats in the spirit of Zell Miller who would join us as well. They will not join the Republican Party under any circumstance.
96 posted on 11/06/2008 7:48:24 AM PST by Camel Joe (liberal=socialist=royalist/imperialist pawn=enemy of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winoneforthegipper

“Can you give the reasoning behind your take that she is not a strong candidate?”

Sure. She came off to me as a bit shaky. Unsure of herself and lacking the self confidence and knowledge needed to express conservative ideals to the general population.

We all know that ANYONE that steps into the national spotlight, and claims to be a conservative, will be savaged by the press relentlessly. They must be able to overcome this in order to reach the numbers that we need.

Her candidacy felt rushed and poorly prepared to me. When questions were posed to her, I felt like she would often miss the central reasons for our stance on said issue.


97 posted on 11/06/2008 7:49:20 AM PST by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Yeah, just like Reagan. "Mr.Reagan, can you name a SCOTUS decision that you disagree with?"

Um, uh, er, uh.

Sounds just like Reagan. Maybe she will be effective. That remains to be seen. Here's hoping we find two or three other quality prospects to compete against her, so we can maybe get the best possible candidate. Smitten is no way to go through politics.


Cherry pick statements all you want, but taking her performance in it's totality and her past record, she out-shone all of the other GOP candidates for President this election season.

And NONE of the other candidates electrified and got the GOP as excited as she did, not even Mr. Hair!

BTW, cherry-picking someone's statement is so DU!
98 posted on 11/06/2008 7:49:38 AM PST by SoConPubbie (GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Know It All

Okay, Mr. Know it All. 34% is obviously a ‘minority’ of 100%.....you’ve got liberals and independents and 34% conservative.....in the voting block they do not represent a minority of the voters. We’re pretty much broken up in 3 groups, like we’ve always been.

The point is this....conservatives still matter in large numbers whether the media and the GOP like it or not.


99 posted on 11/06/2008 7:51:08 AM PST by AuntB (The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl

Agreed.


100 posted on 11/06/2008 7:52:01 AM PST by AuntB (The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 241-249 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson