Posted on 10/25/2008 3:52:37 PM PDT by Danae
Obama is "NOT" qualified to be President of the United States Lawsuit Against Obama Dismissed from Philadelphia Federal Court
For Immediate Release: - 10/25/08 - Contact Info at end. UPDATE: Ruling attached at end. It's a really poor copy, but it is all we have for the moment. Willl put up a better copy when we get one.
(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 10/25/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that he is immediately appealing the dismissal of his case to the United States Supreme Court. The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.
Berg said, "I am totally disappointed by Judge Surrick's decision and, for all citizens of the United States, I am immediately appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court.
This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don't have standing, if you don't have standing, if your neighbor doesn't have standing to question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United States - the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world - then who does?
So, anyone can just claim to be eligible for congress or the presidency without having their legal status, age or citizenship questioned.
According to Judge Surrick, we the people have no right to police the eligibility requirements under the U.S. Constitution.
What happened to ‘...Government of the people, by the people, for the people,...’ Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address 1863.
We must legally prevent Obama, the unqualified candidate, from taking the Office of the Presidency of the United States,” Berg said.
Our website obamacrimes.com now has 71.8 + million hits. We are urging all to spread the word of our website – and forward to your local newspapers and radio and TV stations.
Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, “we” the people, are heading to a “Constitutional Crisis” if this case is not resolved forthwith.
* * For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to obamacrimes.com
# # #
Philip J. Berg, Esquire 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531 Cell (610) 662-3005 (610) 825-3134 (800) 993-PHIL [7445] Fax (610) 834-7659 philjberg@obamacrimes.comThis e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
From Americasright.com
“So, who does have standing? According to the Hon. R. Barclay Surrick, that’s completely up to Congress to decide.
“If, through the political process, Congress determines that citizens, voters, or party members should police the Constitution’s eligibility requirements for the Presidency, then it is free to pass laws conferring standing on individuals like Plaintiff. Until that time, voters do not have standing to bring the sort of challenge that Plaintiff attempts to bring in the Amended Complaint.”(from Surrick’s decision)”
It also may be that the citizens have no ‘standing’ until or unless Obama is actually elected President.
If he isn’t,the the point is mute.
This is just a guess....
Ping.
Ping.
What is the relevance of this?
Did I scoop Drudge???
LMAO
Possible conflict of interest
Mark
Possibly the Senate. Ultimately the Electoral college, but there is NO precident, no Candidate who was a Naturalized citizen rather than Natural Born has ever gotten this far. The Issue was always attended to LONG before this. This is where the DNC failed everyone, all Americans. They didn’t Vet their Candidate.
Obama has not shown anyone anywhere in a verifyable VALID form that he is a Natural Born Citizen with that Legal status.
Not once.
While I do not agree with Berg’s “truther” stuff. Politics have made the strangest bedfellows ever in this election.
Then you go on to say he is right for pursuing this course of action. Your comment would have had more believability if you had omitted your petty disagreement with Berg....
“Could the judge or somebody tell me WHO has standing? And when we find out, let that/those person(s) file suit.”
Well, if an American Citizen doesn’t have standing to ask for verification of the Constitutional qualifications of a presidential candidate, then, I guess, only Queen Elisabeth II must have standing because the Constitution has apparently been revoked!
“He is going to ask the SCOTUS to change the law in essence.”
No actually he is asking the SCOTUS to uphold the law.
Good. This seems to be an area the SCOTUS can address without making any new law. Force Barry or the Hawaii Health department to show it.
Wow!
Yeah...I’m glad I don’t own 8 acres...(like it matters)
Yea... I am not kidding.
34 pages to say “frivolous and not worthy of discussion”?
I will stinken donate!!!!
Awesome video of report grilling Biden!!!!
FINALLY!!!
Why do we need a LAW to police the Constitution? That’s his &*%$# job!!! Who appointed this moron?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.