Ping.
http://www.americasright.com/
"...regardless of questions of causation, the grievance remains too generalized to establish the existence of an injury in fact. To reiterate: a candidates ineligibility under the Natural Born Citizen Clause does not result in an injury in fact to voters. By extension, the theoretical constitutional harm experienced by voters does not change as the candidacy of an allegedly ineligible candidate progresses from the primaries to the general election...
"To reiterate: a candidates ineligibility under the Natural Born Citizen Clause does not result in an injury in fact to voters."
Osama Bin Laden take note: All you really needed to do was get yourself elected!
“...Consider what Surrick said very carefully, read it exactly. Surrick did not say there was not a genuine grievance here. He said the same thing the Judges said about grievance in the McCain cases.
However, he did not say Obama is Eligible. He said, in effect, Eligibility is Irrelevant under the Law, at this point. Surricks rather heavy handed Dismissal specifically applies to conditions prior to the Election and is Procedural in nature. It says nothing of the very different Legal Conditions that apply after the Election. Obama has yet to either win or qualify. Technically Surrick is correct; you cannot sue for an injury that either has yet to happen or which is of an intangible nature...
http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/
thanks for the pings
How can the MSM avoid talking about this if it goes to the Supreme Court? This is good news, even if he loses.