Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LucyT

“...Consider what Surrick said very carefully, read it exactly. Surrick did not say there was not a genuine grievance here. He said the same thing the Judges said about grievance in the McCain cases.

However, he did not say Obama is Eligible. He said, in effect, Eligibility is Irrelevant under the Law, at this point. Surrick’s rather heavy handed Dismissal specifically applies to conditions prior to the Election and is Procedural in nature. It says nothing of the very different Legal Conditions that apply after the Election. Obama has yet to either win or qualify. Technically Surrick is correct; you cannot sue for an injury that either has yet to happen or which is of an intangible nature...

http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/


195 posted on 10/25/2008 6:10:01 PM PDT by Fred Nerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Fred Nerks
Technically Surrick is correct; you cannot sue for an injury that either has yet to happen or which is of an intangible nature...

Hello, am I living in a twilight zone???

"injury that either has yet to happen." Horse Pockey, it ALREADY happened.!

He is on the ballot where he does NOT qualify or belong!!

It is NOT about the election, welcome to the Jura spin-zone. Please helpe me out of this horse manure in the court rooms, I am just going to throw up!!!

222 posted on 10/25/2008 6:58:14 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson