[Diana in Wisconsin]

Calling all Freepers!

Send this article to the Republican Attorney General in YOUR state! (Don't bother if your AG is a 'Rat.)

"Wisconsin could easily become the next Florida."

Bring it on you f-ing CHEATERS!

[Diana in Wisconsin]

Ping! Or did you beat me to this? ;)

[bert]

.....mistakes in your database....

If the individual is not correctly listed in the data base, he is by definition not a voter.

It is up to that individual to determine he is properly listed in the data base and thus a voter.

[GoLightly]

"You shouldn't penalize the voter because you've got mistakes in your database," said Dan Tokaji, an election law expert at Ohio State University. "That's the absolute worst thing to do."

Wisconsin's same day, same location as voting registration makes this "defense" a moot point.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Scott Walker/Van Hollen 2010

[GoLightly]

BTW, Van Hollen was interviewed on Vicki McKenna’s (Milwaukee version) show today.

[Turret Gunner A20]

Joe Wineke, chairman of the state Democratic Party, said the suit is a "cynical attempt to disenfranchise voters" and part of a GOP pattern to "distract and deny voters with fearmongering."

It appears to me that this joker KNOWS a good deal about, and is afraid of, the number of inelegible (illeglly registered "cemetery residebts" and unlawful aliens) on the rolls.

Wonder how they coulod have gotten there????????

[arrogantsob]

Election expert arrogantsob says “ The voter should not be penalized by having his vote offset by an illegal vote. Not to police the voter list is to throw away the essence of Democracy and representative government.”

Which expert makes most sense to you. Not to mention the lying Rat pretends that a challenged voter will not be allowed to vote a provisional ballot in case he is legit.

These fools are so transparent the average Joe is seeing through their lies.

[Calpernia]

Illegals? Pish Posh! We have people from the 1800s on our voter rolls. Now THAT is market outreach!

http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/jersey/index.ssf?/base/news-11/122093494096820.xml&coll=1&thispage=1

Excerpt:

Secretary of State Nina Mitchell Wells, whose office issued the letters, and Assistant Public Advocate Jo Astrid Glading confirmed the erroneous notices were the result of an effort to match voter rolls to motor vehicle records.

The Public Advocate's Office has been demanding such an effort to comply with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993. But glitches in the computer data -- some as minor as a missing middle initial -- led to notices going to voters who are in fact registered, according to Susan Evans, a spokeswoman for Wells.

(snip)

Emphasis:

Evans said 300,000 letters went out to residents of Essex, Bergen and five South Jersey counties. She did not know how many were erroneous. Before the mailings resume, she said, the data will be scrubbed -- in particular to keep those voters listed as 208 years old from getting "unduly alarmed."

(snip)

[unspun]

J.B. to the rescue!

Can you believe the D’rats are actually arguing against provisional balloting? That sure seems a sign they have something to hide....

Spell it by Barack H. Obama’s former employer: A-C-O-R-N.

[NewsJunqui]

Mark Belling on this right now!

http://newstalk1130.com/cc-common/ondemand/player.html?world=st

[ADSUM]

1 in 5 new voter registrations do not agree with WI (state owned and controlled) driver license records or other government databases and the State Elections Board doesn’t want to make corrections or eliminate false registrations.

Something is rotten in Wisconsin and it is spelled

D O Y L E (Democrat Governor).

Van Hollen only wants to check the new registrations from the independent? organizations.

[Robert A Cook PE]

That’s OK, there are only 20% “errors” in the state voter database.

Nothing to see here, just moveon.org