Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The world's verdict will be harsh if the US rejects the man it yearns for ("Who Cares?" Alert)
UK Guardian ^ | September 10, 2008 | Jonathan Freedland

Posted on 09/10/2008 6:12:34 AM PDT by seanrobins

The feeling is familiar. I had it four years ago and four years before that: a sinking feeling in the stomach. It's a kind of physical pessimism which says: "It's happening again. The Democrats are about to lose an election they should win - and it could not matter more."

* * *

Look at yesterday's opinion polls, which have John McCain either in a dead heat with Obama or narrowly ahead. Given the well-documented tendency of African-American candidates to perform better in polls than in elections - thanks to people who say they will vote for a black man but don't - this suggests Obama is now trailing badly. More troubling was the ABC News-Washington Post survey which found McCain ahead among white women by 53% to 41%. Two weeks ago, Obama had a 15% lead among women.

There is only one explanation for that turnaround, and it was not McCain's tranquilliser of a convention speech: Obama's lead has been crushed by the Palin bounce.

* * *

Of course I know that even to mention Obama's support around the world is to hurt him. Incredibly, that large Berlin crowd damaged Obama at home, branding him the "candidate of Europe" and making him seem less of a patriotic American. But what does that say about today's America, that the world's esteem is now unwanted? If Americans reject Obama, they will be sending the clearest possible message to the rest of us - and, make no mistake, we shall hear it

(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: jonathanfreedland; mccain; nonamericancaucus; nonamericanvote; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: seanrobins

What message would that be?

Call yer own damn military up when the Russian tanks roll back into Poland?

Let Europe sort it out the next time India and Pakistan play nuclear chicken?

I have a message for the Guardianistas- each American military gravestone in Europe- was an answer to their last big message. And their rebuilt economy and that of Japan? Yep, that too. And the nonexistent bloodstained Berlin Wall? Yep, that too.


21 posted on 09/10/2008 6:20:08 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seanrobins

The Guardian?

Pravda West, the ‘guardian’ of the marxist agenda.


22 posted on 09/10/2008 6:20:26 AM PDT by Let's Roll (As usual, following a shooting spree, libs want to take guns away from those who DIDN'T do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vimto

The Guardian - Pravda with a posh accent.


23 posted on 09/10/2008 6:21:00 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: seanrobins

Well...may I sugggest the world send UN troops to the US right now................


24 posted on 09/10/2008 6:21:11 AM PDT by rrrod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seanrobins

Fortunately, foreign dictators, crooks, and tyrannists do not pick the US President. Nevertheless, many US citizens are fully aware that the muslim world with money flowing from the middle east is attempting to buy obama the presidency.


25 posted on 09/10/2008 6:22:44 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot ((Hallmarks of Liberalism: Ingratitude and Envy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seanrobins

When Russia invades Europe, let the “internationalists” defend Europe.

Us knuckle dragging, gun toting, bible thumping Yanks will sit on the sidelines and watch the carnage.


26 posted on 09/10/2008 6:23:19 AM PDT by tips up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seanrobins

Yeah, that’s right... American elections are all about making the world like us. They’re not about what’s best for our country. Uh-huh. Makes perfect sense.


27 posted on 09/10/2008 6:24:32 AM PDT by djrakowski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff
Liberal British Boob Jonathan Freedland
28 posted on 09/10/2008 6:24:39 AM PDT by Dinah Lord (fighting the Islamofascist Jihad - one keystroke at a time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: seanrobins

The world is full of thugs, like a dark alley.

Approval is not something that I look to receive from them.


29 posted on 09/10/2008 6:24:43 AM PDT by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seanrobins

The world is wrong. That is why the US has been, and still can be the leader. A leader leads, and does what is right. If a leader sacrifices doing the right thing to please the masses, that’s no longer leading, that’s Clintonism.


30 posted on 09/10/2008 6:25:15 AM PDT by brownsfan (Algore makes P.T. Barnum look like a piker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

It is also known over here as ‘the Grundiard - the famous misprit’ because of all the proofing errors it contains:^)

Coined by the late great Spike Milligan (who they called Spike Milligna)


31 posted on 09/10/2008 6:25:55 AM PDT by vimto (To do the right thing you don't have to be intelligent - you have to be brave (Sasz))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: seanrobins
As I've said before, if B Hussein Obama wants to be President of the World he should run for that office. As it is, he's running for President of the United States and I could give a rat's rear that the rest of the world wants him to be president. If they love him so much let them bring him over and he can run in the UK or Germany or Kenya... he probably has more loyalty to them than American citizens anyway.
32 posted on 09/10/2008 6:31:16 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seanrobins

I love the Brits, but their politics suck. Perhaps the British press should be more concerned about the rising muslim population within their own borders than the politics in “the colonies”.


33 posted on 09/10/2008 6:31:17 AM PDT by SPI-Man (USA! USA! USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: seanrobins
But what does that say about today's America, that the world's esteem is now unwanted?

Well, basically it says that the world's esteem is now unwanted.

If Americans reject Obama, they will be sending the clearest possible message to the rest of us - and, make no mistake, we shall hear it.

What arrogance...America might reject the candidate chosen by countries that continually insult Americans? We do slap you with the glove, sir.

34 posted on 09/10/2008 6:31:55 AM PDT by Sender (Never lose your ignorance; you can never regain it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vimto
I saw it once as the "Grauniad". Same difference.

So "Grundiard" was Spike Milligan's coinage? (That guy was a comic genius.)

35 posted on 09/10/2008 6:32:57 AM PDT by thulldud (All your rumor are mong to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: seanrobins

The reality would be real harsh if we ever got a government that cut off aid to these whining, communist, parasites and limited it to governments that support us. They could then have the whine without the cheese.


36 posted on 09/10/2008 6:33:32 AM PDT by Steamburg (Your wallet speaks the only language most politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

I’m kind of hoping they’re stupid enough to do the same thing again with this election. The hopeless naivete of the average Guardian reader in trying to appeal to the sensibility of the average American wonder worked wonders for the Bush Campaign in Clark County.
McCain is a lot more interested in Anglo-American relations than Obama, although his support for a stronger more integrated EU is a bit worrying, but I don’t think that would make any real difference to the outcome of that particular battle....


37 posted on 09/10/2008 6:33:33 AM PDT by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: vimto
It is also known over here as ‘the Grundiard - the famous misprit’ because of all the proofing errors it contains:^)

Their editorial control must be awful. I guess that communists consider spelling words correctly and editing one's work to be bourgeois. :-) I admit that I have read bits of it from time to time and found the writing to be pedantic.
38 posted on 09/10/2008 6:33:40 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: seanrobins

Reminds me of the global Op-Ed threats made to Israel in the 1990s should they dare elect Bibi Netanyahu over Shimon Peres. Of course, they did.


39 posted on 09/10/2008 6:34:02 AM PDT by beagleone (McCain: He had me at "Hanoi.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thulldud

It could be, that term was coined by ‘Private Eye’ and Milligan was a long time contributor to Private Eye in it’s earlier years....


40 posted on 09/10/2008 6:34:40 AM PDT by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson