Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do nuclear decay rates depend on our distance from the sun?
The Physics Arxiv Blog ^ | August 29th, 2008 | KFC

Posted on 09/02/2008 8:14:57 PM PDT by B-Chan

Here’s an interesting conundrum involving nuclear decay rates.

We think that the decay rates of elements are constant regardless of the ambient conditions (except in a few special cases where beta decay can be influenced by powerful electric fields).

So that makes it hard to explain the curious periodic variations in the decay rates of silicon-32 and radium-226 observed by groups at the Brookhaven National Labs in the US and at the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesandstalt in Germany in the 1980s.

Today, the story gets even more puzzling. Jere Jenkins and pals at Purdue University in Indiana have re-analysed the raw data from these experiments and say that the modulations are synchronised with each other and with Earth’s distance from the sun. (Both groups, in acts of selfless dedication, measured the decay rates of silicon-32 and radium-226 over a period of many years.)

In other words, there appears to be an annual variation in the decay rates of these elements.

Jenkins and co put forward two theories to explain why this might be happening.

First, they say a theory developed by John Barrow at the University of Cambridge in the UK and Douglas Shaw at the University of London, suggests that the sun produces a field that changes the value of the fine structure constant on Earth as its distance from the sun varies during each orbit. Such an effect would certainly cause the kind of an annual variation in decay rates that Jenkins and co highlight.


TOPICS: Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: catastrophism; ontology; physics; quantum; science; stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last
To: F15Eagle
tilt the axis a little bit more I mean ...

If you tilt the Earth's axis *more* during winter, the Sun's light will come in at an even lower angle. It will be colder in winter and warmer in summer (higher sun angle in summer).

81 posted on 09/02/2008 10:50:02 PM PDT by ETL (Smoking-gun evidence on all the ObamaRat-Commie connections at my FR Profile/Home page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

Comment #82 Removed by Moderator

To: All

Anyone but me notice that the person who posted this rather advanced article only responded once during this entire lengthy thread? And that was in response to the article having been posted before. What I suspect is that the person who posted it did so as some sort of a ‘test’ to see just how smart (or dumb) we are here. OR, did it as a joke and are now laughing their butt off at the responses. (not serious, but am wondering)


83 posted on 09/02/2008 10:57:26 PM PDT by ETL (Smoking-gun evidence on all the ObamaRat-Commie connections at my FR Profile/Home page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL
Just check post # 71 for a layman’s explanation of partially curved and “up/down” shaped alpha/beta particles.
The technical terms, like “#2 lead pencil” and “cursive” for the more highly educated are explained in another post.
84 posted on 09/02/2008 11:10:58 PM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: ETL; B-Chan

Well, B-Chan’s been here for a decade, and you’ve been here ~2 orders of magnitude less than that, so I’ll take the prize behind door #1.


85 posted on 09/02/2008 11:19:29 PM PDT by Kevmo (Obama Birth Certificate is a Forgery. http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/certifigate/index?tab=articles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Thanks. I’m not posting much because I don’t know much about physics. Remember, I flunked out of Navy Nuke School!


86 posted on 09/02/2008 11:28:20 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change

LOL! I see what you mean. Even a dopey lib can understand it all now.


87 posted on 09/02/2008 11:30:01 PM PDT by ETL (Smoking-gun evidence on all the ObamaRat-Commie connections at my FR Profile/Home page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
Well, B-Chan’s been here for a decade, and you’ve been here ~2 orders of magnitude less than that, so I’ll take the prize behind door #1.

Wow. I'll bet you understand it all.

88 posted on 09/02/2008 11:33:46 PM PDT by ETL (Smoking-gun evidence on all the ObamaRat-Commie connections at my FR Profile/Home page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Wow. I’ll bet you understand it all.
***Absolutely. But every time I open the box labelled “understand” a cat named “no you don’t” jumps out. His middle name is Schroedinger.


89 posted on 09/02/2008 11:41:01 PM PDT by Kevmo (Obama Birth Certificate is a Forgery. http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/certifigate/index?tab=articles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: ETL

No subject is so complicated that it cannot be confused, confounded and corrupted with skillful writing.


90 posted on 09/02/2008 11:44:16 PM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan

“...more than a decade ago a researcher noticed something funny about two Pioneer spacecraft that were streaming toward the edge of the solar system. They weren’t where they should have been.
Something was holding the probes back, according to calculations of their paths, speed and how the gravity of all the objects in the solar system — and even a tiny push provided by sunlight — ought to act on them. “
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/mystery_monday_041018.html

“We’re not near the sun anymore Toto!”


91 posted on 09/02/2008 11:47:58 PM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan

I don’t know much about physics. Remember, I flunked out of Navy Nuke School!
***At least you got accepted. 2 years later, when you were sitting on the grass on a nice, pretty spring day, your counterpart was slaving away in a nuke sub sweatshop. You may have dodged a bit of a bullet there.


92 posted on 09/02/2008 11:49:50 PM PDT by Kevmo (Obama Birth Certificate is a Forgery. http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/certifigate/index?tab=articles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo; All
LOL! Speaking of Schrödinger, here is an excellent layman's book on Quantum Mechanics which I highly recommend:

Schrodinger's Kittens and the Search for Reality: Solving the Quantum Mysteries -by John Gribbin
http://www.amazon.com/Schrodingers-Kittens-Search-Reality-Mysteries/dp/0316328197

Also...

The Matter Myth: Dramatic Discoveries That Challenge Our Understanding of Physical Reality (Paperback)
- Paul Davies and John Gribbin
http://www.amazon.com/Matter-Myth-Discoveries-Challenge-Understanding/dp/0671728415

93 posted on 09/02/2008 11:55:40 PM PDT by ETL (Smoking-gun evidence on all the ObamaRat-Commie connections at my FR Profile/Home page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
Thanks. I’m not posting much because I don’t know much about physics.

Nothing wrong with that. I was just joshing. But this was one doozy of a topic for non-professionals.

94 posted on 09/02/2008 11:58:11 PM PDT by ETL (Smoking-gun evidence on all the ObamaRat-Commie connections at my FR Profile/Home page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Getready; SunkenCiv

If we can/could follow it to the end, there are no particles, and there is no physics. Its all G-d’s (the creator) dream.


95 posted on 09/03/2008 12:26:29 AM PDT by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
There are several reasons they appear near the surface.

The most obvious would be that they arrived here via impact events after the Earth was long since formed up. In that case, any ages you were to deduce from heavy metals, would apply to the heavy metals themselves but not to our own planet.

96 posted on 09/03/2008 5:26:02 AM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan

There is a boatload of new theory which takes to task several of Einsteins “constants” which he used to make his theory of both general and special relativity work. It is not so much that this theory is grossly wrong - just that some things which he thought were universal constants are, in fact, variable values which change in accord with certain conditions not immediately obvious.

This decay rate variation indicates that much of what we observe here on Earth is related to special conditions present here which may not be the same in other parts of space. THAT is a way cool thing and kinda kicks a whole bunch of qantum physics into a cocked hat and makes way for string theory and other even more obscure propositions


97 posted on 09/03/2008 6:21:46 AM PDT by Dogrobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Still, I though describing a thermocouple power array as not your ‘generation’ was a terrible pun...


98 posted on 09/03/2008 8:09:01 AM PDT by null and void (Sarah Palin might be more conservative than even John McCain ~ Megyn Kelly, Fox News 9/2/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Getready
Could a massive spacetime “convulsion” reset the radioactive clocks???

Excellent question!

I have no idea...

99 posted on 09/03/2008 8:12:52 AM PDT by null and void (Sarah Palin might be more conservative than even John McCain ~ Megyn Kelly, Fox News 9/2/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: gorush

I note that Schrödinger doesn’t look like he’s all there...


100 posted on 09/03/2008 8:16:39 AM PDT by null and void (Sarah Palin might be more conservative than even John McCain ~ Megyn Kelly, Fox News 9/2/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson