Posted on 08/15/2008 6:40:42 AM PDT by docbnj
A top Russian general said Friday that Poland's agreement to accept a US missile defense battery exposes the country to attack, pointing out that Russian military doctrine permits the use of nuclear weapons in such a situation, the Interfax news agency reported. *** Interfax said he added, in clear reference to the agreement, that Russia's military doctrine sanctions the use of nuclear weapons "against the allies of countries having nuclear weapons if they in some way help them." Nogovitsyn said that would include elements of strategic deterrence systems, according to Interfax.
(Excerpt) Read more at jpost.com ...
Great! Put it in bold! What you think you caught me or something?
I’m not going to sit here and lie and say I served and pretend something I’m not unlike yourself.
Yeah you’re right, maybe I’ll drop my mortgage, leave my baby and wife, quit my job and make the choice to leave to satisfy someone who has trolled the message boards for 8 years.
Look at this private reply that ‘Itsareligionofpeace’ sent me, he actually tries to sell that he is conservative:
First, check out my profile. Ive been here for years, probably since you were in elementary school. I am a true conservative. I also try to approach issues with logic and reason. In situations like this, its always good to ask, Is the issue great enough an issue that it would make sense for someone to place me in harms way.
I wont even entertain your idiotic comments about running to Canada.
Your 1st cousin is in the Navy. Why dont you ask him how he likes the idea of us carpet bombing Russians tomorrow. Of course, if hes a good sailor, hell say that hes not wild about it but that hell do whatever needs to be done. But, hell also tell you that he hopes whenever hes asked to put his life in harms way, the leaders who made the decision have made a rational and smart decision. Nothing controversial here, right?
Now, when some d Bag on FR starts mentioning carpet bombing and dropping nukes, I think its very reasonable for me to ask them about there ridiculous positions. Especially when they use terms like we, lets.
Hopefully this will help you think a little more clearly and with a higher level of maturity. You certainly have enough bad role models on FR.
Have a good day.
_—————————————————————————
A conservative who implies the FR is basically a bad role model? He thinks his four quotes on his profile validates him has conservative. Too funny!
Oh and I love the part where he’s “being a little nicer” than usual.
Looks like we have a Suvarov wannabe here.
I’m a “dumbass” for admitting that I haven’t served...
Unlike your ace in the hole of NOT admitting YOU haven’t served either? Or that you don’t even like the military. Or that you’re an 8 year liberal troll??
It’s really sad that you have to pretend to be someone or something you’re not to a bunch of people who will never change their mind.
YOU’RE NOT EVEN BRAVE ENOUGH TO TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT YOURSELF ON A FREAKING MESSAGE BOARD. AND UNTIL SUCH TIME YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO DEMAND STANDARDS OF FREEPERS PERSONAL LIVES.
It’s funny how a family member being in the military (i.e. possibility of going to war) was the standard you first set. Now, the standard has to be: the skin of the very person voicing his opinion.
Get a life!
He might be a conservative. He’s also an internet tough guy who spends most of his time here anonymously insulting strangers. That’s really all I need to know about the dude to know that he isn’t worth the time of day.
There’s nothing more boring than an internet badass who vandalizes every thread with meaningless insults. Every message board has an unlimited supply of these types. They’re a dime a dozen.
Forget about him. He’s actually very easy to ignore.
If you were truly "rational," you'd certainly realize that most folks you are calling "internet commandoes" are venting and realize full well the situation is a complex one. they also are aware that their internet postings will have little direct effect on america's military policy.
I think maybe you need to go for a walk or something; the internet is serious business and it can overwhelm a fellow sometimes.
And the U>N> awol again. Time and time again.
Is there a coflict or war that we shouldn’t fight? Apparently life is cheap to you. It isn’t to me.
The problem is that these morons vote.
You may not like Bush but the alternative would have had us in a much less safe World. Bush stood his ground and got something done. Not like Clinton. We commit with Bush, and he’s going to finish the job. Was it costly..yes. Was it perfect no. But it has worked to keep our country safe. Like it or not we have a culture that many in the world would like to topple. There are decisions that have to made to keep us safe. The economic situation we are in due to our involvment in Iraq for example does NOT serve the multination corporations. I personally disagree with many of Bushes policies, but I don’t disagree with finishing what you started. And of course that isn’t free. We have to back those in the world —like Georgia— who are friends of freedom and who are being hammered. Georgia Poland and Ukraine should be admitted into NATO if for no other reason than Russia just attacked Georgia.
We have not yet used our greatest weapon...Wall St. It is time to let the Rooskies know who holds all the cards in this poker game. It is time to get every American bank, mutual fund, insurance company, foundation and every other institution to start selling every Russian stock that we own. Choke the Rooskies in billions of overnight losses and convince the Europeans to do the same. Let the Rooskies know that if you want to be a bully, there is not a single place on earth outside of Russia to park your rubles!
I don’t disagree with you. It’s a matter of where you draw the line. I am no dove by all means. Read the quotes on my profile.
“You may not like Bush but the alternative would have had us in a much less safe World. “
I know. I voted for and supported him in both elections. Same thing now with McCain.
But I’m getting damn tired of having to back the lesser of two evils.
more like ..a massive convoy of decrepit vehicles.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.