Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Western Oil Shale Potential: 800 Billion Barrels of Recoverable Oil
U.S. Department of the Interior ^ | 07/22/2008 | Chris Paolino, Frank Quimby, Matt Spangler

Posted on 08/07/2008 5:16:24 AM PDT by Red Badger

Oil shale is a fine-grained sedimentary rock containing organic matter from which oil may be produced. The regulations would provide for a thoughtful, phased approach to oil shale development on public lands in the West. [Photo Credit: Argonne National Laboratory]

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management today published proposed regulations to establish a commercial oil shale program that could result in the addition of up to 800 billion barrels of recoverable oil from lands in the western United States.

In keeping with the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, the BLM is proposing regulations that would provide the critical “rules of the road” on which private investors will rely in determining whether to make future financial commitments to prospective oil shale projects.

“As Americans pay more than $4 for a gallon of gasoline and watch energy prices continue to climb higher and higher, we need to be doing more to develop our own energy here at home, through resources such as oil shale,” said Secretary of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne. “Instead, I find it ironic that we are asking countries halfway around the world to produce more for us.”

Oil shale is a fine-grained sedimentary rock containing organic matter from which oil may be produced. The regulations would provide for a thoughtful, phased approach to oil shale development on public lands in the West. Commercial development of oil shale will not begin until it is technologically viable, which is not expected for several years.

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is only publishing proposed regulations at this time because the Consolidated Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2008 prohibits the agency from using FY2008 funds to prepare or publish final regulations. The President has called on Congress to remove the ban on finalizing oil shale program regulations.

Before any oil shale leases are issued, site-specific National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analysis would be completed on the proposed development. Once a lease is issued, the lessee will also have to obtain all required permits from state and local authorities, under their respective permitting processes, before any operations can begin.

The proposed leasing regulations incorporate provisions of the Energy Policy Act and the Mineral Leasing Act relating to: maximum oil shale lease size; maximum acreage limitations; rental; and lease diligence. The rule will also propose a range of royalty rate options, and will ask for public input on the royalty provisions. The public will have 60 days to comment on the proposed rules.

The regulations address provisions of the Energy Policy Act that establish work requirements and milestones to ensure diligent development of leases. Standard components of a BLM leasing program ─ including lease administration and operations ─ would be included, as well as additional NEPA documentation requirements for lease applicants.

In remarks last month calling on Congress to expand domestic energy production, President Bush noted the “extraordinary potential” of oil shale resources on public lands in the West. According to the U.S. Geological Survey, the U.S. holds more than half of the world’s oil shale resources.

The largest known deposits of oil shale are located in a 16,000-square mile area in the Green River formation in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming. Shale formations in that area hold the equivalent of up to 800 billion barrels of recoverable oil. Federal lands comprise 72 percent of the total surface of oil shale acreage in the Green River formation.

“Oil shale is a strategically important domestic energy source that should be developed to reduce the nation’s growing dependence on oil from politically and economically unstable foreign sources,” said BLM Director James Caswell.

Throughout the process, the BLM will collaborate and consult with affected states, tribes and local governments to ensure that their interests and concerns surrounding the oil shale program continue to be addressed. For instance, the site-specific NEPA analyses would include the same opportunities for public involvement and comment that are part of the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement process.

The regulations are just one of several steps designed to harness these vast energy resources. The BLM has also issued research, development and demonstration (RD&D) leases for five oil shale projects in Colorado’s Piceance Basin and one in Utah. The BLM is also preparing a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement that would amend several resource management plans to open lands for application for potential oil shale leasing in the future.

The Oil Shale Regulation on the electronic desk of the Federal Register today is at http://federalregister.gov/OFRUpload/OFRData/2008-16275_PI.pdf


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado; US: Utah; US: Wyoming
KEYWORDS: 2008; domesticoil; drillheredrillnow; drilling; energy; energyfacts; fuel; gasprices; oil; oilshale; petroleum; westernoilshale
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!!!!!

NANCY, CAN YOU HEAR US NOW????????................

1 posted on 08/07/2008 5:16:24 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sully777; vigl; Cagey; Abathar; A. Patriot; B Knotts; getsoutalive; muleskinner; sausageseller; ...
Rest In Peace, old friend, your work is finished.....

If you want ON or OFF the DIESEL ”KnOcK” LIST just FReepmail me.....

This is a fairly HIGH VOLUME ping list on some days.....

2 posted on 08/07/2008 5:17:49 AM PDT by Red Badger (All that carbon in all that oil and coal was once in the atmosphere. We're just putting it back.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Yeah, but we won't be able to get any oil from there for a billion, trazillion years...

All us professional Democrat oil driller/politicians know this for a FACT.

3 posted on 08/07/2008 5:20:00 AM PDT by an amused spectator (Wikipedia: The Truth Was Out There, but it was reverted...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

http://www.denverpost.com/ci_4530946

Something you may want to read. There are studies showing this extraction method yields sub $28 a barrel cost.


4 posted on 08/07/2008 5:24:56 AM PDT by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (Si Hoc Legere Scis Nimium Eruditionis Habes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Somewhere there are probably Democratic scientists that have been tasked with finding microbes that require the shale to exist, thus endangering them if we mine it.

Hey, it’s not any more far fetched than some of the crap coming out of their camp lately...


5 posted on 08/07/2008 5:26:23 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
But, with a simple Executive Order to investigate the price rigging of British Petroleum and Goldman Sachs to cover subprime losses, old time gas wars would come back.
6 posted on 08/07/2008 5:28:42 AM PDT by kcm.org (Conservatives bashing Sen. McCain has Ronald Reagan spinning in his grave!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
From wikipedia:

According to British Petroleum's Statistical Review of World Energy, in 2007 Saudi Arabia reported it had 264 billion barrels (42×109 m3) of estimated oil reserves, around 21% of the world's conventional oil reserves

We've got more than 3x as much as the Saudis, but we allow ourselves to be held hostage to the Middle East.

7 posted on 08/07/2008 5:39:56 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Et si omnes ego non)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Someone is overlooking the Democrats in Colorado who have been passing statutes to stop oil shale development. This includes Senator Salazar and his Moratorium,

March 13, 2008.
“Today, the United States Senate voted down a Republican amendment to the Senate Budget Resolution that sought to override a one-year moratorium on oil shale development included in the omnibus appropriations bill late last year. The one-year moratorium is necessary to allow states and affected communities to work with the BLM to help restore order to the regulatory process, so that oil shale development can occur responsibly.”


8 posted on 08/07/2008 5:40:55 AM PDT by Steamburg (Your wallet speaks the only language most politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steamburg; All

Bakken oil, shale oil, its all the same but it can be extracted now. On page 3 in my website http://www.theusmat.com/I have posted a questionaire asking conservative candidates to include it in their surveys, and to get conservative local talk show to pose it on their shows.

The general public does not now how much oil we have “holed up” in our country thanks to MSM, that knowledge must get out.
Your help is needed


9 posted on 08/07/2008 6:04:24 AM PDT by mosesdapoet (Confront your favorite dem and ask em why we're not getting our own oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator

I thought you were going to say that environmentalists will keep the licensing tied up for a billion, trazillion years. );-)


10 posted on 08/07/2008 6:16:52 AM PDT by popdonnelly (Boycott Washington D.C. until they allow gun ownership)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mosesdapoet

I think we need some sort of permanent presence in Washington that pushes for energy development. The environmental lobby has too much say in what gets done in D.C.


11 posted on 08/07/2008 6:19:36 AM PDT by popdonnelly (Boycott Washington D.C. until they allow gun ownership)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger; glock rocks; Pete-R-Bilt; B4Ranch; SouthTexas
Ping in case you’re not on the list...
12 posted on 08/07/2008 7:25:41 AM PDT by tubebender (Why does a round pizza come in a square box?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

bookmarking


13 posted on 08/07/2008 7:29:33 AM PDT by EdReform (The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed *NRA*JPFO*SAF*GOA*SAS*CCRKBA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

800,000,000,000 barrells of oil?

That is enough for 40,000 years at current consumption of 20,000,000 barrells per day.

So...... what’s the crisis here?


14 posted on 08/07/2008 7:46:08 AM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24
So...... what’s the crisis here?

For the Dems, THAT is a crisis!............Fuel and energy independence is to them like a cross and garlic necklace to a vampire!............

15 posted on 08/07/2008 7:52:20 AM PDT by Red Badger (All that carbon in all that oil and coal was once in the atmosphere. We're just putting it back.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24

Days, not years


16 posted on 08/07/2008 7:55:42 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tubebender

bump


17 posted on 08/07/2008 7:56:13 AM PDT by SouthTexas (Invert the 5-4 and you have no rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Peg the price to some value below world oil prices and guarantee the oil companies $20 per barrel profit. The remaining mineral fee should be directed explicitly toward US debt and be forbidden from use toward current services. This may be more than a chance to be energy independent, it might also reflate the value of the American dollar.


18 posted on 08/07/2008 7:59:16 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

Atsa nice ! What has that got to do with the subject at hand ? Getting the word out to the American people ?


19 posted on 08/07/2008 8:05:46 AM PDT by mosesdapoet (Confront your favorite dem and ask em Hows the sir in your tires ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24
"800,000,000,000 barrells of oil? That is enough for 40,000 years at current consumption of 20,000,000 barrells per day."

Not 40,000 years but rather 40,000 days. It would be 109 years worth at current usage.

20 posted on 08/07/2008 8:15:55 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson