Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/26/2008 9:14:09 AM PDT by NewJerseyJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: NewJerseyJoe

It’s OK, he’s a liberal and everyone knows they only have to obey the laws they like...


2 posted on 06/26/2008 9:16:14 AM PDT by Russ (Repeal the 17th amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewJerseyJoe

Another politico, “Stuck on Stupid”!


3 posted on 06/26/2008 9:16:19 AM PDT by Redleg Duke ("All gave some, and some gave all!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewJerseyJoe; P-Marlowe

Does anyone still make single shot pistols?

Muzzle-loaders?

I think “semi-automatic” is a description of every pistol in existence.


4 posted on 06/26/2008 9:16:56 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain -- Those denying the War was Necessary Do NOT Support the Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewJerseyJoe

I’m sure he has not a clue what “semi-automatic” means.


5 posted on 06/26/2008 9:17:20 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (Peace is Not The Question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewJerseyJoe
yest they are spitting in the face of the Supreme. Hoping that there man will win and appoint liberal judges that will reverse the ruling and destroy the Constitution.
6 posted on 06/26/2008 9:17:33 AM PDT by YOUGOTIT (The Greatest Threat to our Security is the Royal 100 Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewJerseyJoe
Yep. He's inviting a lawsuit. A right means nothing if it cannot be effectively exercised. I don't think DC Thug Fenty still grasps what an individual right means. He will learn it soon enough.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

7 posted on 06/26/2008 9:17:44 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewJerseyJoe

Looks like he’s headed to court again and will have his head handed to him again.


8 posted on 06/26/2008 9:17:46 AM PDT by saganite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewJerseyJoe

Semi-auto pistols are standard military issue.


9 posted on 06/26/2008 9:18:09 AM PDT by RightWhale (I will veto each and every beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewJerseyJoe

It’s one thing to SAY SO, it’s another to enforce it- I think the SCOTUS just made that harder to do.

WOO HOO- If Obama had appointed some judges this would have gone the other way


11 posted on 06/26/2008 9:19:10 AM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewJerseyJoe

A revolver may not be technically a semi-automatic. The force of the shell doesn’t cause the re-load, the pull of the finger does.

Not that Libs should be allowed to split hairs like that.


14 posted on 06/26/2008 9:19:28 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (McCain / Kerry '08! ************* McCain's Dream Ticket, only the names have been reversed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewJerseyJoe
Mmmkay...I can't think of too many handguns that aren't "semi-automatic".

My .357 revolver is "semi-automatic".

What's this bozo talking about?

16 posted on 06/26/2008 9:19:48 AM PDT by Recovering Hermit ("A liberal feels a great debt to his fellow man, which debt he proposes to pay off with your money.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewJerseyJoe
Doesn't that directly contravene this morning's ruling?

Assuming semi auto hand guns qualify for 'common use', then Yes.

17 posted on 06/26/2008 9:19:51 AM PDT by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewJerseyJoe

If I was a cop or a judge or a prosecutor in DC right now, I’d tread very very lightly on doing anything to arrest or convict someone.

They can be individually and collectively sued for violating a persons civil rights.


18 posted on 06/26/2008 9:19:52 AM PDT by djf (I don't believe in perpetual motion. Perpetual mutton, that's another thing entirely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewJerseyJoe

I’m not surprised to hear this. Fenty’s an ass.


20 posted on 06/26/2008 9:20:08 AM PDT by manapua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewJerseyJoe

Lets do the same with the first amendment too. Single speeches are protected but not multiple political speeches.


21 posted on 06/26/2008 9:20:24 AM PDT by icwhatudo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewJerseyJoe

He probably doesn’t even know what the hell a semi automatic weapon is, and doesn’t even know what in the hell SCOTUS ruled today.


22 posted on 06/26/2008 9:20:24 AM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewJerseyJoe

Yep. The Man’s rules don’t apply in Chocolate City North. Remember, this is a city that still thinks Marion Barry is the best mayor they ever had.

}:-)4


23 posted on 06/26/2008 9:20:48 AM PDT by Moose4 (http://moosedroppings.wordpress.com -- Because 20 million self-important blogs just aren't enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewJerseyJoe

I see more court cases.


27 posted on 06/26/2008 9:22:03 AM PDT by bmwcyle (If God wanted us to be Socialist, Karl Marx would have been born in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewJerseyJoe

He’s a moron. He doesn’t know the difference between automatic and semi auto and my guess is he’s never sent a round down range in his life.

Firearms training should be a requirement for holding public office.


28 posted on 06/26/2008 9:22:23 AM PDT by navyguy (Some days you are the pigeon, some days you are the statue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NewJerseyJoe
He'd have a hard time squaring that prohibition with:
We also recognize another important limitation on the right to keep and carry arms. Miller said, as we have explained, that the sorts of weapons protected were those “in common use at the time.” 307 U. S., at 179. We think that limitation is fairly supported by the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of “dangerous and unusual weapons.”
Just about any handgun is semi-automatic, revolvers included, when you define semi-automatic as removing the need to physically operate a bolt-type mechanism between trigger pulls.
31 posted on 06/26/2008 9:23:17 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (If it is going to take 10 years, shouldn't we get started? Drill here, drill now, pay less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson