Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oil Traders Face New Regulation
Business Week ^ | June 09, 2008 | Moira Herbst

Posted on 06/09/2008 1:23:15 PM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou

The dramatic surge in oil prices—including a $16-per-barrel jump in just two days last week—has left Washington regulators scrambling to exert new oversight on futures trading in oil and other commodities. The U.S. regulatory agency's abrupt shift toward more rigorous oversight in the past two weeks also represents a stark example of how the pinch from high gasoline prices has changed the political landscape and made energy traders prime suspects in congressional inquiries.

As recently as May 20, the U.S. commodities regulator, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), insisted at a Senate hearing that speculation was not causing the rapid spike in energy prices. The CFTC's chief economist, Jeffrey Harris, testified that the agency found that speculation and manipulation are not causing energy prices to surge. He said that instead prices are being driven "by powerful economic fundamental forces and the laws of supply and demand." Nine days later, after further pressure from Congress, the agency announced steps aimed at more oversight of energy futures trading.

Among the measures:

• A new information-sharing agreement with Britain's commodities regulator, the Financial Services Authority (FSA), to gather information on large positions of the benchmark West Texas Intermediate (WTI) contract.

• A proposal to consider reclassifying investment banks such as Goldman Sachs (GS) and Morgan Stanley (MS) as speculators, which would subject them to trading limits from which they're currently exempt.

• An investigation of the crude oil trading market dating to December, 2007.


(Excerpt) Read more at businessweek.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: bubble; energy; energyprices; govwatch; oil; regulation; traders
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
Oil futures fell over $4/barrel today. It might be time to go short.

Lots more of interest in this article for the interested Freeper.

1 posted on 06/09/2008 1:23:16 PM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

Congress is going to hold hearings...grandstand on television...and then...do nothing.


2 posted on 06/09/2008 1:25:11 PM PDT by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

How silly.

As if we are the only market. All regulation will do will move it to London or the Caymans or somesuch.


3 posted on 06/09/2008 1:25:21 PM PDT by TheThirdRuffian (McCain is the best candidate of the Democrat party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjo

But not in this case. When constituents are screaming to control oil prices, there will be action.


4 posted on 06/09/2008 1:28:02 PM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

This is long over due. They need to regulate the Intercontinental Exchange.

This two part article is MUST read for everyone who drives or heats their home.
http://www.star-telegram.com/ed_wallace/story/651928.html
http://www.star-telegram.com/ed_wallace/story/659081.html


5 posted on 06/09/2008 1:32:22 PM PDT by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
The Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 (CFMA) allowed energy commodities for the first time to be traded on deregulated "exempt commercial markets," meaning exchanges exempt from CFTC or any other U.S. government oversight.

I recall a similar wild spike in electricity prices in California, several years back, 2005? Also, in natural gas, in 2006 I believe.

Sounds like this CFMA needs to be ditched, with a return to regulations created during the Great Depression.

6 posted on 06/09/2008 1:33:58 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
The entire commodities market has always been underregulated, while the the stock market has rigorous regulations. Think Hillary Clinton and cattle futures.

As for congress, we "threw the buns out" in 2006 for what? Congress has done NOTHING but campaign for their horse in the presidential race. ENOUGH of the hearings, there are TOO MANY hearings! Open those Alaskan oil fields!

7 posted on 06/09/2008 1:34:11 PM PDT by cake_crumb (Indonesian terrorist organizations endorse Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

$16 is more than a barrel of oil was getting in the mid 1980’s!


8 posted on 06/09/2008 1:34:20 PM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheThirdRuffian
"The only way to permanently deflate the [commodities] market is to ensure more aggressive oversight." If the CFTC took the next step of requiring all U.S. crude trades to be subject to CFTC regulation and trading limits, oil prices would drop by 25% "overnight," says Greenberger.

Exactly as pointed out in Hayek - "Road to Serdom" - bureaucrats can't control part of the economy. Economic effort flows to where they don't control, leading to demands for broader controls. In the end, they must control every decision we make or they can not achieve their objectives.

Which, somewhere along the line, always become control itself, with the original 'problem' long forgotten in the lust for power. It's sad and a bit frightening to see Hayek's analysis playing out before us.

And Hayek's analysis points inexorably toward a dictatorship.
9 posted on 06/09/2008 1:34:45 PM PDT by Phlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

NYMEX shows Brent up $0.17 to $134.08 and CL (WTI) closing up $0.31 at 134.66


10 posted on 06/09/2008 1:35:20 PM PDT by politicalwit (AKA... A Tradition Continues...Now a Hoosier Freeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

I’ve said this for years now.. this bubble will burst the minute the regulators get serious about it... However with the amount of greed tax on it right now, until some people get frog marched, I don’t see it returning to where it should anytime soon.


11 posted on 06/09/2008 1:36:32 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SUSSA

“They need to regulate the Intercontinental Exchange.”

You sure you are on the right website?

This is a free market, conservative, website for people who undestand basic economics.

MORE regulations are NEVER the answer.

All increased US regulations would do will move the trade to China, Hong Kong, London -— somewhere where we’d have LESS oversight and be subject to MORE manipulation by foreign powers.


12 posted on 06/09/2008 1:39:07 PM PDT by TheThirdRuffian (McCain is the best candidate of the Democrat party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

• A proposal to consider reclassifying investment banks such as Goldman Sachs (GS) and Morgan Stanley (MS) as speculators, which would subject them to trading limits from which they’re currently exempt.

It’s about time. This isn’t a new regulation, it’s simply enforcing the old one. I hope a lot of these long speculators fail to find short buyers.


13 posted on 06/09/2008 1:41:13 PM PDT by freedomfiter2 (It's too bad I've already promised myself to never vote for McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheThirdRuffian
This is a free market, conservative, website for people who undestand basic economics.

So you think the Hunts trying to corner the silver market and driving the price to $48/oz was a good free market thing?

14 posted on 06/09/2008 1:45:47 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kjo
Of course they aren't going to do anything. “Traders” are not nearly as responsible for the rise in price of gasoline as is Congress. If they dig too deep or press traders too hard, the word is apt to get out: Congress (especially the Senate, and Dems in particular) are even more to blame!
15 posted on 06/09/2008 1:45:52 PM PDT by singfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheThirdRuffian
MORE regulations are NEVER the answer.

Well, LESS regulation did such a wonderful job in the mortage market, eh?

16 posted on 06/09/2008 1:46:42 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

Quotes from artcle:
1.
“If the CFTC decides to subject investment banks trading swaps to speculative trading limits—currently 3 million barrels of WTI crude oil for front-month trades—oil prices could deflate significantly, say analysts. “If [the CFTC] forces trade limits on these funds, commodity index traders will have to pull out of this market,” says Stephen Schork, an energy consultant in Villanova, Pa., and editor of The Schork Report, a daily energy newsletter. “The [commodities] bulls would be in for a world of hurt.” Schork says such a correction would send oil prices back to the $80-$100 range.”

2.
“Also testifying before that committee, Greenberger suggested that simple adjustments to commodities regulation could remedy what he views as an artificially accelerated price runup. “If we go back to the way the market was regulated on Dec. 20, 2000, 25% of the [oil] price would disappear,” he says.”

3.
“Greenberger says that given the heated political climate, he fears that misguided propositions that would distort the market—like banning speculators from commodities markets entirely—could win support. “The American consumer is so beaten up, [Congress] may have to resort to more drastic measures or the sky will fall.””

If the current Bush administration is not willing to do 1 and 2....
The _next_ Obama administration will do 3 and worse.

One day last week, gas prices in the New Haven CT area jumped 16-17 cents overnight. All we need is a few more jolts like this nationally, and we’re almost guaranteed to end up with a totally ‘rat controlled government in 2009. What do you think _they’ll_ do about “the markets”?

- John


17 posted on 06/09/2008 1:52:42 PM PDT by Fishrrman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SUSSA
We traders have been saying that for months, m'friend. Not so much regulation per se, but improvements in transparancy.

However, even ICE are the lesser villains here. CFTC (or the Regress...) have simply got to rein in the ''index specs'' and their complete lack of position limits.

18 posted on 06/09/2008 1:57:45 PM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

“Well, LESS regulation did such a wonderful job in the mortage market, eh?”

What’s wrong with the mortgage market?

Some banks who shouldn’t have lent money to liars may get hosed?

Some idiots and speculators who borrowed too much money may lose their shirt?

Sounds find to me.

The problem is half-ass regulation to try to “fix” what idiots did. They idiots just need to go broke. THAT’s the way a market works.


19 posted on 06/09/2008 1:57:53 PM PDT by TheThirdRuffian (McCain is the best candidate of the Democrat party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

And in the airline industry...


20 posted on 06/09/2008 1:57:58 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson