Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/04/2008 9:34:05 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: SmithL

Won’t that cause a heck of a lot of confusion in November when gay marriage is banned again?


2 posted on 06/04/2008 9:36:58 AM PDT by HoosierHawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

More fuel to the fire. This incenses me so much I think that will go over to http://www.protectmarriage.com/donate.php right now and make a donation. I suggest the rest of you Calfornia’s do the same.


4 posted on 06/04/2008 9:37:57 AM PDT by Smogger (It's the WOT Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Just wait until the couples move to other states, suing for married benefits.


5 posted on 06/04/2008 9:39:08 AM PDT by SmithL (Reject Obama's Half-Vast Wright-Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

There has to be a way to get these legislating justices removed from the bench.


6 posted on 06/04/2008 9:39:11 AM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
Proof that the ruling was not legal, but political.
10 posted on 06/04/2008 9:47:17 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (We have people in power with desire for evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

They don’t want to stay the implementation of their edict because they know the referendum will succeed. They plan to invalidate the constitutional referendum on the grounds that it is illegally ex-post facto - effectively stripping individuals of rights they already have.


11 posted on 06/04/2008 9:48:26 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Not a surprise at all

Everyone in the country I would have thought would be fuming at this decision, the ovters voted on what they wanted and the judges over turn the will of the people and make a law.Just what utter nonsense this is, imagine these homosexuals thinking they are married and then whe the constitution is changed word for word by the people the homosexuals will now not be married.
It’s like those in massachusetts, they think they are married and when they get out of the state they are not in most of the ocuntry.
One person who has a homosexual friend said that his woman boss is married , I had to correct him and say no they think they are but ion this state (Florida) they are not so they can dream all they want

Why also do we not see this being covered on the likes of hannity, on fox etc?


12 posted on 06/04/2008 9:48:50 AM PDT by manc (a normal natural marriage is between a man and a woman, MA has a perverted sham marriages)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

just more gasoline on the fire...


14 posted on 06/04/2008 9:53:32 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Why is anyone surprised?

I do have a question on this request. Has any court ever postponed the effective date of a ruling until election day before ?


15 posted on 06/04/2008 9:55:54 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Total judicial arrogance!


16 posted on 06/04/2008 9:57:23 AM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Sickening display of arrogance by an effete corp of impudent judicial elites.


17 posted on 06/04/2008 9:57:25 AM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Well, I think we owe the bigamists and polygamists an apology. At least their practices are more normal than gay marriage! And if the “judges” are so concerned about discrimination, then what about those who wish to marry dogs, or ponies? vDon’t THEY have rights, too? LOL.


22 posted on 06/04/2008 10:09:01 AM PDT by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
Pathetic. The good thing about this is they're going to make butt-sex marriage a national issue this year.

Should help Republicans everywhere, assuming our guys aren't stupid enough to go wussy in the issue. Not a guarantee, I know.
24 posted on 06/04/2008 10:36:36 AM PDT by Antoninus (John 6:54)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Curious as to which, or who in this “Supreme Court” are in such a damned hurry to get married?


26 posted on 06/04/2008 10:38:20 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...call 'em what you will...They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
No surprise. The “judges” ruled in favor of allowing gay marriage because they knew they were under a time crunch. The petition was WELL on it's way to surpassing the number of signatures it needed when these tyrannical judges made their decision to strike down Prop 22. They knew damn well they would lose on this one if they didn't attempt to strike first.

Allowing these sham marriages to proceed is all part of the propaganda and PR campaign to fight the amendment vote. They will be broadcasting the “happy” couples nonstop between now and November, and accusing anyone who votes for the amendment as being a cold hearted bigot. They will show gay couples sobbing saying “We waited 18 years as a couple for this, please don't take it away.” etc. etc. etc.

The leftists will also put out more rigged polls, as they did last week, taken in places like San Francisco to try to prove why the “majority” of California is against the amendment. I heard that rigged poll used on the news on the radio news yesterday. The announcer said, “The ballot initiative will be put up for vote, but according to polls it isn't expected to pass.” B.S.

Ignore the liberal media's coverage of this and fight gay marriage.

27 posted on 06/04/2008 10:45:02 AM PDT by 444Flyer (Marriage=One man+One woman! Vote to amend the California State Constitution this November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
The court's contempt for Californians is outrageous! Its activist judges need to be taught a lesson.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

28 posted on 06/04/2008 10:47:30 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Supreme Court: WE ARE YOUR RULERS!! BOW DOWN TO US IMMEDIATELY OR WE WILL CREATE A LAW TO SMITE YOU FROM THIS LAND. YES, WE KNOW THAT ISN’T CONSTITUTIONAL, BUT THAT DOESN’T MATTER- WE ARE YOUR RULERS!!!


31 posted on 06/04/2008 10:54:02 AM PDT by Southerngl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Maybe this and the prospect of President B.O. will motivate some conservatives to come out and vote. It should help some Republicans in state and congressional races on the November ballot in California.


36 posted on 06/04/2008 11:32:25 AM PDT by Bubba_Leroy ("Once again, the white man keeps us down. What's up with Whitey?" - Michelle "My Belle" Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Wow that’s SHOCKING. I did not expect this.


59 posted on 06/04/2008 3:27:54 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Congrats: Duncan D Hunter, Jan Goldsmith, Jerry Sanders, Carl DeMaio, Phil T., Tom McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Of course, they probably all use the same bathroom and do the tap dance.


62 posted on 06/04/2008 9:44:32 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Quick justice for the senseless killing of Marine Lance Cpl. Robert Crutchfield.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson