To: SmithL
Won’t that cause a heck of a lot of confusion in November when gay marriage is banned again?
To: HoosierHawk
Government by Sob Story depends on that.
3 posted on
06/04/2008 9:37:51 AM PDT by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: HoosierHawk
Wont that cause a heck of a lot of confusion in November when gay marriage is banned again?Then the initiative will be overturned as being an ex post facto law. The courts have become something very sinister.
19 posted on
06/04/2008 10:03:38 AM PDT by
Chaguito
To: HoosierHawk
Wont that cause a heck of a lot of confusion in November when gay marriage is banned again? That happened before when the mayor of San Francisco, Philanderer Newsom, promoted gay marriage in his city in defiance of federal law, and then those couples who fell for it had their licenses invalidated later.
23 posted on
06/04/2008 10:31:15 AM PDT by
Albion Wilde
(Poor people been voting for Democrats for the last 50 years, and they still poor. --Charles Barkley)
To: HoosierHawk
Of course it will cause confusion. Just as it did in MA. That is why the courts won't stay the decision. Then they can claim you cannot take away a right since some phony marriages have already taken place. And they will whine and carry on “Don't take away our rights! Don't make us second class citizens” and on and on and on. Don't be surprised if CA voters never get to vote.
On a more positive note, the SCOTUS accepted David Parkers parents rights lawsuit!
42 posted on
06/04/2008 12:26:37 PM PDT by
gidget7
(Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson