Posted on 05/11/2008 4:13:06 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
WASHINGTON (AFP) - While John McCain is practically assured the Republican presidential nomination, many party members are having a hard time accepting him -- and showing it with symbolic votes against him in primary contests.
The Republican nomination battle has been all but decided for over two months. Still, some Republicans used the April 22 Pennsylvania primary and last week's votes in Indiana and North Carolina to register their unhappiness with the de facto victor.
Some vote for libertarian Texan Ron Paul, who has refused to quit the race and has racked up more than one million votes, according to his campaign.
Other Republicans keep voting for former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, and former governor Mike Huckabee of Arkansas -- both markedly more conservative than McCain -- although both have long since dropped out of the race and endorsed him.
As many as 25 percent of Republican voters want a different candidate to represent their party in the November 4 presidential election. In Pennsylvania, 27 percent opted for Huckabee or Paul; in North Carolina and Indiana on May 6, McCain opponents earned 23 percent of the vote.
The Washington Times, a conservative newspaper, calculated that McCain had garnered no more than 45 percent of the Republican vote since January.
McCain's reputation as a party maverick and a compromising moderate has left the party's most conservative and ideological members disgruntled.
He focused this week on winning their backing, delivering a major speech on legal issues and promising to nominate conservative justices to any possible new Supreme Court vacancies, as President George W. Bush has done.
"I have my own standards of judicial ability, experience, philosophy, and temperament," McCain said.
"And Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito meet those standards in every respect. They would serve as the model for my own nominees if that responsibility falls to me," he said, pointing to Bush appointees.
Even so, McCain carefully avoided mentioning thorny subjects like abortion and homosexual unions, on which he has staked out much more moderate positions than members of the party's religious right.
On Thursday, McCain vigorously denied voting in the 2000 presidential elections against Bush, his main rival during the Republican primaries that year.
Popular liberal pundit and Internet blogger Ariana Huffington had published a report that shortly after the election, McCain revealed during a dinner that he did not vote for his party's nominee.
"I voted for Bush in 2000 and 2004," the Republican candidate insisted on Fox News. "And not only that, far more important than a vote, I campaigned everywhere in America for him."
While such defenses might help the Arizona senator woo the most conservative Republicans, it carries great risks.
A Wall Street Journal opinion poll last week showed only 27 percent of Americans approved of Bush's performance. And 43 percent said they worried that McCain "will be too closely aligned with the Bush agenda" -- a worry Democrats are already moving to exploit.
That spells trouble for McCain with the potential swing centrist voters McCain needs to defeat his Democratic opponent, Senator Barack Obama or Senator Hillary Clinton.
And before y’all start piling on, I’ve shared my views for overthrowing the Government time and time again.
It’s just not the right time...yet. :)
He did indeed promise that and also...
To Speak to the Nationa La Raza meeting
To NOT stop sanctuary cities
To NEVER drill in ANWAR
Oh yeah he's focused on conservatives. Good Lord.
I think that is about right. I will drag myself to the polls in November.
doubt.
hmmmmmm.
that’s what they call it, huh?
Same here, Obamao is simply unpalatable, McCain at the very least is a budget hawk, wants to ya know, “win” in Iraq, and is our only shot not to have Ginsburg or Stevens replaced with even more liberal SCOTUS nominees and wants the Bush tax cuts to remain in place.
Compared to Obamao, he is William Buckley.
I have no doubts about McCain and he has no vote from me.
“McCain faces doubts among Republican conservatives”
Understatement of the Decade award nominee.
Our only hope now is the VP choice.
“He needs all the moderates he can get since no Conservative is voting for him.”
“I plan to vote for him”
Mm-hmm. Several extremely new “conservatives” to FReeperland that are backing McBackstabber.
“and is our only shot not to have Ginsburg or Stevens replaced with even more liberal SCOTUS nominees”
No matter how liberal those nominees might be, they are but one vote.
Well, Mr “experienced” Freeper, who do you plan to vote for? A Democrat? It’s either McCain or a Democrat. What side of the fence are you on?
Maybe, don’t know don’t care.
If getting a liberal is that important to you vote Obama.
bump
We are actually at a historic turning point on the court and to let it laspe will be an opportunity missed we won't have again in our lifetime.
This theory has already been shot down.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.