Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama: "I Will Raise Taxes"
townhall.com ^ | May 8, 2008 | Amanda Carpenter

Posted on 05/08/2008 6:06:06 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

By Amanda Carpenter

Thursday, May 8, 2008

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama flatly promised to raise taxes in a television interview Thursday afternoon.

“I will raise CEO taxes,” Obama told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer on “The Situation Room.”

“If you’re a CEO in this country you’ll probably pay more taxes,” Obama said. Obama speculated his CEO tax rates “won’t be prohibitively high, you’ll pay roughly what you did in the 90’s when they were doing fine.”

Obama also said he would eliminate the Bush tax cuts and install what he called a “middle class tax cut.”

Blitzer asked Obama to define “middle class.”

Obama replied, “You know, I think the definitions are always a little bit rough” and said “if you’re making $100,000 a year or less, then you’re pretty solidly middle class…On the other hand, if you’re making more than $100,000 and certainly if you’re making more than $200,000 or $250,000, you’re doing pretty well.”

The CNN interview was the first one Obama has held since Tuesday’s primaries in Indiana and North Carolina. In it, the Illinois senator also discussed his judicial philosophy. Obama, who has delivered constitutional lectures at University of Chicago Law School, said he thought Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was “a very sensible judge.” He also hinted he would place special emphasis on civil rights protections when appointing Supreme Court judges if elected President.

“We’ve got to make sure civil liberties are protected,” Obama said. “Because oftentimes there are pressures placed on politicians to want to set civil liberties aside, especially at a time when we’ve had terrorist attacks. Making sure we maintain our separation of powers so that we don’t have a president who is takes over more and more power, I think those are all criteria by which I’d judge whether or not this is a good appointee.”


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 101000peryearisrich; 2008; barackobama; blueturban; democratparty; democrats; elections; fritzmondalepartdeux; lendmeyourears; marxism; mondale; nextpresident; obama; obamatruthfile; obambi; punishacheivement; rewardindolence; taxincrease; whatamaroon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241-251 next last
To: muawiyah
They just can't get it through their heads that folks making between $100,000 and $250,000 are NOT rich ~ they are making more than others, but they're struggling to get their business going so it can compete against the big guys, or they're putting their kids through a college a cut above what they'd ordinarily be able to afford, and that's so their "family" can progress up into the income categories the fat cats like the Kennedy's and Clinton's and Obama's are in.

So very true, worth repeating.

What defect of mind or character is it that democrats carry that keeps them locked into zero-sum thinking around money?

It is very similar to flat earth thinking...a stubborn refusal to acknowledge reality or even be curious about how it works. Are they so pinned to their jealousies and do-gooderism that they just can't grasp something so intrinsic to freedom?

The way I see it, capitalism illustrates spiritual law -- freedom with responsibility. Anyone who gets this close to the presidency should at least have some semblance of an idea about how banks work and how money is created. There are consequences to economic naivete, and Obama appears to have bitten so deeply into his (fellow traveler) mom's world view that he is completely incurious about how capitalism works.

101 posted on 05/08/2008 7:22:46 PM PDT by nascent skeptic (we're proles with broken souls /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I went back and looked and if you are in the 250-300 range you can expect another 20-25k added to your tax bill. Does he think people who have grown accustomed to that money won’t miss it when it’s confiscated? That pulls a kid or two out of private school or college Mr. Wealth Redistribution.


102 posted on 05/08/2008 7:22:58 PM PDT by Edison (I don't know what irks me more, the lying or the incompetence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

excuse me, Mr. Obama, but given the cost of living in NYC, a $100-250k family household income is pretty decisively middle class, bordering on working class for the lower end of that range. What is this man thinking?


103 posted on 05/08/2008 7:23:08 PM PDT by quesney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
But Mondale was running against a much better man than Hussein is.

Very true! And Reagan was running against a much better man than Obama is as well.

104 posted on 05/08/2008 7:23:52 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
"said he thought Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was “a very sensible judge.”

Holey Moley!!

The 527s are going to have a picnic with this one!!!

105 posted on 05/08/2008 7:25:22 PM PDT by cookcounty (Obama reach across the aisle? He's so far to the left, he'll need a roadmap to FIND the aisle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I will raise your taxes was such a successful campaign theme for Walter Mondale, I’m sure it will play as wells with the American people with Obama.


106 posted on 05/08/2008 7:26:49 PM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams; bill1952
Sorry if you'd rather play mental games than deal with reality.

BUMP. That's gonna leave a mark!!
107 posted on 05/08/2008 7:27:03 PM PDT by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

Didn’t another democrat presidential candidate once say he would raise taxes and then lost the election to our boy Reagan?


108 posted on 05/08/2008 7:27:16 PM PDT by RWB Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

There’s plenty of spam for sure - and most of it is not getting posted by McCain supporters.


109 posted on 05/08/2008 7:28:18 PM PDT by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander
The Democrats certainly like raising taxes: on oil companies, on individuals, on just about anything or anyone that looks like there might be some prosperity to tax.

Yep. The claim that someone or some entity is "making too much" sure gets thin when they set their eyes on your paycheck rather than going the indirect route and claiming they are taxing the "excess" profits of some corporate entity which will just pass the tax on to the consumer anyway.

I am glad to see you 'get it', and wish more people did.

110 posted on 05/08/2008 7:28:34 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Kay Ludlow
If he's going to raise taxes on those earning more than $100k, I wonder if that will include athletes and Hollywood stars. Would they continue to support him?

You bet they would. Anything to assuage their guilt and show off their supposed open-mindedness. Plus, they CAN afford it.

They don't give a cr*p about us little people who will be hurt by a tax increase. You know, the one's who made them rich in the first place. Hypocritical Hollyweirdos.

111 posted on 05/08/2008 7:31:09 PM PDT by mplsconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

It’s a statement of McCain’s Supreme Court appointments position. I thought it might answer some of your questions about that. It’s not intended to be pro or con McCain.


112 posted on 05/08/2008 7:33:10 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY ((((Obama's issues would be better resolved in a psychotherapists office, than in the Oval Office))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: TLI
“If you’re a CEO in this country you’ll probably pay more taxes,”

Jiminey Crickets is this black racist dangerous to America and her economic success.

God help us all if he wins.


113 posted on 05/08/2008 7:33:56 PM PDT by Prole (Pray for the families of Chris and Channon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

This is not news.


114 posted on 05/08/2008 7:36:55 PM PDT by fightinJAG (RUSH: McCain was in the Hanoi Hilton longer than we've been in Iraq, and never gave up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplsconservative
They don't give a cr*p about us little people who will be hurt by a tax increase. You know, the one's who made them rich in the first place. Hypocritical Hollyweirdos.

Yep.

115 posted on 05/08/2008 7:40:47 PM PDT by Kay Ludlow (Free market, but cautious about what I support with my dollars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

“I’M sorry if you would rather play games with reality and squirm and twist here rather than admit that your guy sat on the Senate floor and voted YES to confirm this semi communist ACLU lawyer bitch”

So did just about every other Republican in the Senate at the time.

Wasn’t the vote something like 98-2?

You could make the same accusation against nearly every other Republican senator, conservative or otherwise.

The fact is, that traditionally, Senators pretty much voted to confirm appointments by the opposing party as a matter of course.

The Republicans vote for the Democrat’s nominees because they respect that principle, based on the assumption that if someone had gotten elected to the presidency, they had enough judgement through which to pick qualified candidates (even MARGINALLY qualified candidates).

It is the ‘RATS who have “politicized the process” in the last twenty-five years, and they have now degenerated to the point where they will vote against Republican judicial nominees simply BECAUSE they were nominated by Republicans. Or do anything possible to prevent Republican judiicial candidates from ever reaching a full-Senate vote, period.

The only way to fight this fire is with “return fire”. That is to say, Republicans should now attempt to block any and all ‘rat judicial nominations, filibustering them if necessary.

If the Pubbies dare do this, watch a Democratic-controlled Senate pass “the nuclear option” in two minutes - along with a provision that such option last only until the current Senate session ends (to prevent such a tool from falling into Republican hands if they ever regain control of the Senate).

But your beef with McCain that he voted for Ginsburg simply doesn’t hold water. The rest of his Republican colleagues DID EXACTLY THE SAME THING.

- John


116 posted on 05/08/2008 7:41:05 PM PDT by Fishrrman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Should we be surprised? After all, they’re all paid by tax money. I’d be happier if he was willing to tax himself into oblivion.


117 posted on 05/08/2008 7:46:50 PM PDT by Kuri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Obama is now TOAST. Promising to raise taxes is a BIG NO-NO.


118 posted on 05/08/2008 7:49:53 PM PDT by Biggirl (A biggirl with a big heart for God's animal creation, with 4 cats in my life as proof. =^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Thanks for your post.

The left believe they ARE God. They know better than you how to raise YOUR children, know better than you to spend YOUR money, demand that you surrender to their group think and surrender your GOD-Given sovereignity as a human being. However, when it comes to them, oh no, THEY want what’s “theirs.” (what they stole from you and me).


119 posted on 05/08/2008 7:59:20 PM PDT by Levante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

You can kiss my ass!”- Ted Nugent, “Kiss My Ass”

I prefer another version of that tune....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiYyHNgeFA8


120 posted on 05/08/2008 8:01:36 PM PDT by RasterMaster (Rudy McRomneyson = KENNEDY wing of the Republican Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241-251 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson