Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Plan for long life, without pandemic (Should we let people older than 85 die in a pandemic?)
The Charlotte Observer ^ | Tue, May. 06, 2008 | NANCY STANCILL

Posted on 05/06/2008 7:51:17 AM PDT by Sam's Army

Plan for long life, without pandemic NANCY STANCILL Should doctors let people older than 85 die in a flu pandemic?

A Monday news story saying a U.S. task force recommends denying lifesaving care in a pandemic or other disaster to some folks -- including healthy people above 85 -- was unsettling.

They're talking about my mother, soon to be 86. My friend Karen's father, who is 92. Another friend's grandmother, 102.

These people live life joyfully, with their minds and hearts intact. My mother relishes foreign travel. Karen's father loves bird watching. The 102-year-old grandmother plays a mean hand of bridge.

Financial planners, who routinely urge clients to base their planning on living to 95 or more, were aghast when I told them the news.

"I hope that none of my clients ever have people who want to make that decision for them," said Paul Boggs, a certified financial planner with R.P. Boggs and Co. in Lake Wylie, S.C. "That doesn't sit easy with me."

He said he has clients who are active in their 90s, including a few who still work daily at their companies.

Diane Davis, a certified financial planner in Charlotte, said she is amazed at such a recommendation, given that medical advances are increasing longevity all the time.

"A lot of us baby boomers would have an issue with that," she said.

It seems counterintuitive that the task force, influential physicians from universities, medical groups and government, would recommend letting people over 85 die in a flu pandemic.

The proposed guidelines are designed to be a blueprint "so that everybody will be thinking in the same way" in a disaster, Asha Devereaux, a critical care physician from San Diego and lead writer of the report, told the Associated Press.

Task force members said the idea is to allocate scarce resources, such as ventilators, medicine and doctors and nurses, in a uniform way. In addition to those over 85, the guidelines would cut out people with severe chronic disease and mental impairment.

Eighty-five doesn't seem so old anymore, especially when today's young folks have a heightened chance of living to 100.

The United States has about 54,000 centenarians, a number that has risen steadily over the last decade. One longevity expert predicts as many as 840,000 centenarians in 2050.

Cindy Anderson, a certified financial planner with Anderson Financial Planning in Charlotte, said she uses the age of 99 when mapping out strategies for folks in their 50s and 60s.

"My software won't go any higher," she said. "I have clients whose parents are dying in their 90s. I'd rather the clients die with money than without."

That got me thinking about money. If you have enough of it, it's an antidote to the loss of power people often experience in old age. And that got me thinking about saving.

So what's the trick to making money last into your 90s or beyond?

Don't withdraw more than 4 percent yearly from your savings after you retire, all three planners said.

"If you start hitting your principal early, that's a tough situation," said Boggs.

Other advice:

• Buy good supplemental health insurance. Don't rely solely on Medicare as you age.

• Get a financial checkup each year after you retire, so you can apply the brakes if you're spending too much of your nest egg.

• If you can afford it, buy long-term care insurance in your 40s or 50s. You may never need it, but if you do, you'll have the resources to avoid poor-quality care.

• Plan for inflation in some areas, such as utilities, taxes and food. But planners also note that some expenses, such as travel and entertainment, may decline in your 90s.

"As clients get older, they spend money in different ways," said Anderson. "They often stop spending a lot of money on shopping and the symphony."

Nancy Stancill's On the Money appears in the Observer Sundays and Tuesdays. Reach her at 704-358-5066 or at nstancill@charlotteObserver.com

ON THE MONEY

Disaster care report A task force charged with looking at health care in a flu pandemic or other disaster says lifesaving care may need to be rationed.

The task force's recommendations for who would not get treatment include:

• People older than 85.

• Those with severe trauma, which could include critical injuries from car crashes and shootings.

• Severely burned patients older than 60.

• Those with severe mental impairment, which could include advanced Alzheimer's disease.

• Those with a severe chronic disease, such as advanced heart failure, lung disease or poorly controlled diabetes.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bioethics; elderly; eugenics; euthanasia; genx; health; longevity; moralabsolutes; pandemic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last
To: skipper18

Agreed, no argument there. But you’ve just described a small mass casualty incident, and I was talking about every day. In my real but admittedly suburban world, when I take an elderly patient to the ER, they go first in line in part because they tend to call with serious conditions and in part just because they are elderly and almost anything could potentially be serious with them.


61 posted on 05/06/2008 11:13:11 AM PDT by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl

Agreed, but see post 59.


62 posted on 05/06/2008 11:13:25 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
I agree with your post generally. But,

But let’s be very wary of what the agenda is here.

I don't think there was an agenda in the report. It seems like a government agency is attempting to put together guidelines in a worse case scenario, and some "journalist" blows it up. Just the way I see it.

63 posted on 05/06/2008 11:21:36 AM PDT by thefrankbaum (Ad maiorem Dei gloriam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

Hey seriously. They might have an agenda to kill all of us at a certain age, but if that happens, there is nothing I can do about it. I die and pray that Our Lord thinks I was a good and faithful servant.

There’s something better than this and I pray I get there.


64 posted on 05/06/2008 11:26:11 AM PDT by netmilsmom (I am very mad at Disney. Give me my James Marsden song!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: discipler
You’re dumb. You stupid, addle brained, jackass.

Nice, mature reply. Did you not see this on the posting page? Please: NO profanity, NO personal attacks, NO racism or violence in posts.

65 posted on 05/06/2008 11:31:22 AM PDT by trussell (I carry because...When seconds count between life and death, the police are only minutes away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

I disagree. We can do smething about it, but it has to start now, not when they spring it on us.


66 posted on 05/06/2008 11:42:27 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Sam's Army; 230FMJ; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


67 posted on 05/06/2008 11:49:26 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

It’s a good idea for those of us who are older and have some resources to be able to shelter in place and stay away from crowds in a pandemic.

When first discussion of the SuperFlu (H5N1) came up, my family reviewed resources and decided at what stage the grandkids come live in the country with me, and at what stage their parents join us.

That obviates the need for triage: a plan to keep the family healthy. Our exact preparations are private, of course, but they do include plenty of fresh and stored food.

It’s a disaster plan for anything, really—come earthquake in the New Madrid, come terrorist nuke attack, come pandemic, whatever, we try to plan and be ready. Then triage is not so scary—everyone stays away from contamination, everyone lives (if at all possible).


68 posted on 05/06/2008 11:50:55 AM PDT by Judith Anne (Don't just do something! Stand there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
I'm in agreement with you. I'm over 50, had several heart attacks and some chromic medical issues related to work injuries. That being said, in a pandemic, I would expect the government to treat those who are most likely to survive with treatment, than waste scarce resources on dubious patients such as myself. If a pandemic were to occur, all I ask from my government is to give me what I need at the time to make my passing as less painful as possible.
69 posted on 05/06/2008 11:51:18 AM PDT by TheBlueMax (A nation that believes in nothing will always lose to an enemy that believes in something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

So, because there’s sort of a plan to uniformly triage people in the case of a pandemic or other disaster in which life-saving treatment is scarce in a manner that will save the most lives, this is just a camel’s nose for the REAL agenda which is to withold treatment for old people altogether without such a disaster and move to a Logan’s Run world?

How about plans to quarantine cities in the case of a highly contageous and fatal infectious disease outbreaks....that just the camel’s nose for the real agenda of a total police state with Checkpoint Charlie on every corner?

.....slippery slopes are fun.

I’d say the “agenda” here is to have plans in place to save the highest number of lives in certain extreme scenarios instead of flying by the seat of the pants when the shi’ite DOES hit the fan.


70 posted on 05/06/2008 11:56:56 AM PDT by ElectricStrawberry (27th Infantry Regiment...cut in half during the Clinton years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: TheBlueMax

Amen!


71 posted on 05/06/2008 12:07:00 PM PDT by netmilsmom (I am very mad at Disney. Give me my James Marsden song!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Sam's Army

The task force’s recommendations for who would not get treatment include:

• People older than 85.

• Those with severe trauma, which could include critical injuries from car crashes and shootings.

• Severely burned patients older than 60.

• Those with severe mental impairment, which could include advanced Alzheimer’s disease.

• Those with a severe chronic disease, such as advanced heart failure, lung disease or poorly controlled diabetes.

************************************************************

Some of those recommendations leave way too much leeway for diagnosis.

Critical injuries can heal.

How severely burned?

What level on mental impairment is *severe*?

Just what would someone call *uncontrolled diabetes?

How much loss of lung capacity?

The potential for abuse of this is makes it totally unacceptable.


72 posted on 05/06/2008 1:10:46 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

Occasionally there is no black or white. In extreme circumstances, there is grey. That is reality not a nose under the tent.


73 posted on 05/06/2008 2:33:33 PM PDT by cajungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
Occasionally there is no black or white. In extreme circumstances, there is grey. That is reality not a nose under the tent.

To be quite frank, your post shows you didn't comprehend what I wrote. Please go back and read it again.

74 posted on 05/06/2008 2:44:42 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
It’s a good idea for those of us who are older and have some resources to be able to shelter in place and stay away from crowds in a pandemic.

Agree 100%. In fact, every American should do so, because a pandemic or a really bad terror attack could leave us all on our own for days, maybe weeks. Iagine if they managed to nuke four or five major cities on one day, for instance.

When first discussion of the SuperFlu (H5N1) came up, my family reviewed resources and decided at what stage the grandkids come live in the country with me, and at what stage their parents join us.

You're very wise.

75 posted on 05/06/2008 2:47:51 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ElectricStrawberry

1. I said we should be wary and I provided examples of libs using extreme situations to cloud moral issues. I didn’t scream “IT’S A CONSPIRACY, RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!”

2. Take a look back at the last 100 years or so of Aerican history and tell me there weren’t plenty of reasonable-sounding ideas that turned out being used by the libs as leverage to screw society up.

3. Do you really think we need a national triage plan such as this? Are American doctors really so dumb that if we’re short on doses they wouldn’t be able to figure it out?


76 posted on 05/06/2008 3:23:04 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

Well, this is America, land of the self reliant... :D


77 posted on 05/06/2008 4:27:19 PM PDT by Judith Anne (Don't just do something! Stand there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: All

I may have missed it - but did anyone mention choice by the people?

Perhaps some people would willingly for their own reasons choose to pass on the medication so another may live.

We expect the military to make those decisions daily.


78 posted on 05/06/2008 4:31:28 PM PDT by imintrouble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine
Baby Boomers are on the edge of reaping a terrible harvest as their children turn on them like wolves. "Dad would not have wanted to live this way.......besides I need that new BMW"

The Brooke Astor case comes to mind, although the mother & son involved were much older.

One commentator, however, foresaw amoral, financially profligate younger generations disposing of their parents like garbage to get ahold of the inheritance. Euthenasia will be the rage.

79 posted on 05/06/2008 4:33:21 PM PDT by MoochPooch (I'm a compassionate cynic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
Have you read about the principals of triage in a disaster?

Scarce medical resources in a disaster are allocated according to who can survive.

As for me, if a pandemic occurred and there were scarce resources, I think they ought to be used on the young. It makes sense.

I freely admit that I am strongly opposed to ageism--especially when the objects of this proposed discrimination would "includ[e] [otherwise] healthy people above 85"--but the discrimination does not stop there. Those who are either physically disabled or mentally handicapped would also be among those unapproved for rescue. If that is not reminiscent of the ghastly practices of Nazi Germany, I simply cannot imagine what might be.

80 posted on 05/06/2008 9:00:29 PM PDT by AmericanExceptionalist (Democrats believe in discussing the full spectrum of ideas, all the way from far left to center-left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson