Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Wesley Snipes Got the Maximum (3 years in Jail for Failure to File Tax Returns)
Newsmax ^ | April 28,2008 | James Hirsen

Posted on 04/28/2008 9:29:20 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Wesley Snipes had only been convicted of misdemeanors concerning his failure to file income tax returns.

And the action movie star had submitted written character testimonials from Denzel Washington, Woody Harrelson, and television's Judge Joe Brown to assist him in the judge’s consideration of his sentencing.

Through his attorneys, Snipes asked for probation rather than prison, which is the normal sentence with a conviction of someone without a criminal history. Still, in spite of it all, U.S. District Judge William Terrell Hodges sentenced Snipes to three years in prison.

Why did this happen?

Well, in February 2008, a federal jury acquitted Snipes of felony tax fraud and conspiracy (which could have placed him in the slammer for more than a decade) but convicted the actor on three misdemeanor counts of failing to file a tax return.

Snipes’ two co-defendants, a defrocked accountant and a tax protest leader, were convicted on the felony counts and may go to jail for 10 years.

Because Snipes is a celebrity, his case has received an enormous amount of publicity. In defense of his actions, he essentially asserted tax protest arguments that have consistently been brushed aside by the courts.

Unfortunately, unscrupulous people sell books, tapes and the like, which end up convincing some people that they don’t have to pay income tax.

Snipes claimed that the tax code did not mandate payment of income taxes by citizens who earned the money in this country. He additionally claimed that the IRS is not a legitimate government entity and therefore had no legal authority to collect taxes.

Jurors found that the actor failed to file for three years.

In the sentencing memo filed by his lawyer, Snipes also asserted that he didn’t have to file returns because he “was a 'stateless person' or 'nonresident alien.'”

The prosecutors’ sentencing memo stated that Snipes' policy was “to send checks received at his business office for deposit offshore.”

In addition, the memo stated that the actor paid approximately “$498,000 in personal payments to Snipes' grandmother, his former wife, his then-fiancee, his personal lawyer, a tax defier organization, and M&S Finance, the Swiss alter-ego to which he fraudulently conveyed his business holdings in 1999,” and that the amount of unreported gross income for the three-year period was “$13 million.”

Snipes exhibited a “history of contempt over a period of time” for U.S. tax laws, the judge said.

You can bet Judge Hodges knew full well that lots of people who maintain similar beliefs to Snipes and his co-defendants were watching the case and would be encouraged not to file and not to pay if Snipes hadn’t been given the max.

----------------------------------------------------------

James Hirsen is a media analyst, Trinity Law School professor, and teacher of mass media law at Biola University.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: hirsen; hollywood; irs; snipes; taxes; taxevasion; wesleysnipes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last
To: philetus
Snipes won’t serve 6 months

Assuming he doesn't get a new trial on appeal (unlikely) or a sentence reduction on appeal (unlikely) he'll serve 85% of 3 years, or about 2 years and 6 months.

There is no federal parole, only 15% "good time" if he behaves himself.

41 posted on 04/29/2008 1:01:10 AM PDT by AntiScumbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk

I have no illusions.

If the Dems ever unwound the reductions, they would NOT unwind the increases such as I was hit with.

Or worse.


42 posted on 04/29/2008 1:18:29 AM PDT by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Why Wesley Snipes Got the Maximum”

“the action movie star had submitted written character testimonials from Judge Joe Brown”


43 posted on 04/29/2008 3:27:59 AM PDT by shaft29 (Just your typical black woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: philetus

Practically every Californian can get a CCW.


44 posted on 04/29/2008 3:28:29 AM PDT by Ajnin (Neca Eos Omnes. Deus Suos Agnoset.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Woody Harrelson as a character witness? LOL


45 posted on 04/29/2008 3:33:32 AM PDT by visualops (artlife.us . nature photography desktop wallpapers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
As much as I hate paying income tax, it is something we all must do. If we want to change the laws to get rid of the income tax, we can work within the system to do it. Until then, we have to obey the law.

Poppycock. What if the law required you to something like bow to meter maids or beat your children. Down with tyranny.

46 posted on 04/29/2008 3:47:47 AM PDT by Impy (FREE WESLEY SNIPES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Incorrect.


47 posted on 04/29/2008 3:54:35 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
I am angered that the IRS did not do more to ensure a conviction on all counts against him and send him to prison for life.

I can't even begin to understand the mindset that would want to see another individual sent to prison for life for failure to pay their taxes. Statism is alive and well I see.

Would you have wanted the tax protesters of 18th century America thrown into prison for life as well?

The IRS should be considered an abomination to any freedom loving individual.

48 posted on 04/29/2008 4:00:57 AM PDT by ksen (Don't steal. The government hates the competition. - sign on Ron Paul's desk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ksen

I don’t if it is relevant, but didn’t Willie Nelson basically do the same thing? If I remember right, I don’t think he served any time. Maybe he claimed he was too stoned to remember.


49 posted on 04/29/2008 4:05:51 AM PDT by catfish1957 (Hey McLame, you can fool some of the people some of the time, but you a'int fooling any FReepers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
You can bet Judge Hodges knew full well that lots of people who maintain similar beliefs to Snipes and his co-defendants were watching the case and would be encouraged not to file and not to pay if Snipes hadn’t been given the max.

You don't quite get the point of your own words do you?

50 posted on 04/29/2008 4:17:40 AM PDT by Hebrewbrother (Dissent - The Highest Form Of Patriotism.....Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
The latest Bush “tax cut” has cost me at least $35,000 over the last two years, and I am NOT a high income taxpayer.

I'm slow...how?

51 posted on 04/29/2008 4:28:55 AM PDT by 50sDad (OBAMA: In your heart you know he's Wright.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
The higher your position in society, the harder you fall.

Too right. We all remember how much hard time Teddy Kennedy did. And Bill Clinton ain't never getting out of prison for his acts of rape and perjury.

I bet if Snipes had been a Democrat politician he would have got off with a slapped wrist.

52 posted on 04/29/2008 4:31:36 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EdArt; traviskicks
Why should we tolerate stealing because it is the law.

Good question.

BTTT

53 posted on 04/29/2008 4:34:12 AM PDT by murphE (I refuse to choose evil, even if it is the lesser of two)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

I guess those who carried out the Boston Teaparty should have “worked within the system” to change things instead of making a stand against what they knew was unjustified. Yeah, okay.

Just because something is “the law” doesn’t mean it should be obeyed. What is right and what is legal can be two very different things. More often than not, much of the system and it’s laws are purely self-serving to those in power, and everyone else (i.e., the actual citizenry) is perceived as a means/resources to it’s own ends. This has certainly become the case in this liberty-starved country.

Maybe if enough people actually stood up like Snipes did, and stopped handing over tribute to the extortionist thugs called the US Federal Government, then some real change might start happening. But so long as everyone tacitly goes along with this rampant theft because “it’s the law,” then this will continue indefinitely no matter how much anyone dislikes it.

Oh, and it’s really odd to see so many conservatives celebrating a tax protester getting thrown in prison. I don’t care what his politics are, liberal or not. Nobody deserves to get thrown in jail for not paying taxes. It’s completely unnecessary and cruel.


54 posted on 04/29/2008 4:35:05 AM PDT by Government Is Slavery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ColdSteelTalon; ArizonaJosie; EdArt; Impy; ksen; Government Is Slavery
I get it now... if I am some sort of statist sheep, then you people are all "Conservatives in Name Only."

Comparing Wesley Snipes to the brave revolutionaries is insulting. The people who fought for our separation from England were not fighting taxation. They were fighting taxation without representation. They were angry that they had no say in what taxes they had to pay.

Wesley Snipes is no patriot, he is a criminal. We are a nation of laws, and as much as the law on income taxes stinks, we are expected to pay it until we elect people who will repeal such laws.

I always was led to believe that "conservatives" were all about being law abiding. After all, we constantly rail against liberals who flout the law. Is it OK for us to preach that we are a nation of laws, and that no one is above the law, except when it relates to us and it is something we don't like?

55 posted on 04/29/2008 4:46:41 AM PDT by pnh102 (Save America - Ban Ethanol Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
If we want to change the laws to get rid of the income tax, we can work within the system to do it.

No, you can't, n00b.

56 posted on 04/29/2008 4:53:40 AM PDT by an amused spectator (Spitzer would have used the Mann Act against an enemy in a New York minute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
No, you can't, n00b.

Which is exactly why the Prohibition is still in force, right?

57 posted on 04/29/2008 4:57:40 AM PDT by pnh102 (Save America - Ban Ethanol Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Wpin

There was nothing heroic about what Snipes did. As much as I may disagree with Joan Baez withholding her taxes in the 60s as an anti-war protest, what she did was done on principle. Snipes tried to cheat on his taxes and got caught, THEN brought up various very weak anti-tax arguments.

Snipes and his Hollywood cronies support the tax-raising party. They want you and me to pay the taxes to pay for all their do-good programs, while they shift their millions of dollars in income offshore. Not a damned thing heroic here. It’s the very definition of elitism.


58 posted on 04/29/2008 4:58:29 AM PDT by EDINVA (Proud American for 23,062 days.... and counting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: pnh102; ColdSteelTalon; ArizonaJosie; EdArt; Impy; ksen; Government Is Slavery
They were fighting taxation without representation.

In the beginning of the Republic, 20,000 citizens were represented by one representative.

Currently, 600,000+ citizens are represented by one representative.

In the beginning of the Republic, pretty only people who were taxed could vote on taxation.

Currently, the voting pool has been heavily diluted with those who SUBSIST on tax dollars.

Our "representatives" just tried to dilute the voting pool even further with their phony "amnesty".

What in God's name are you talking about when you talk about "taxation with representation"?

59 posted on 04/29/2008 5:01:12 AM PDT by an amused spectator (Spitzer would have used the Mann Act against an enemy in a New York minute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
Which is exactly why the Prohibition is still in force, right?

Prohibition threatened the government, so it's gone, gone, gone.

The government got smart and instituted the War on Drugs as a test model for further encroachments on liberty. If you're carrying several thousand dollars in cash, the Kettenhunde can seize it and charge it with a crime. You'll never get it back.

Furthermore, the government then instituted the War on Tobacco, as a preliminary for dealing with alcohol. Soon, the government will attack alcohol with the same tools they used on tobacco.

Hell, right now, it's a thoughtcrime to drink and drive. But I suppose a statist like you just loves that sort of thing...

60 posted on 04/29/2008 5:07:15 AM PDT by an amused spectator (Spitzer would have used the Mann Act against an enemy in a New York minute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson