This one wins an AssPress Bias Award.
1 posted on
04/28/2008 3:55:37 PM PDT by
SmithL
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: SmithL
"Who's going to show up and sign an affidavit saying 'I'm poor'?"The same people who show up at the welfare office and say "Gimme money".
2 posted on
04/28/2008 3:58:57 PM PDT by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: SmithL
In Indiana, more than 20 percent of black voters do not have access to a valid photo ID, according to an October 2007 study by the University of Washington.
Complete B.S.
3 posted on
04/28/2008 3:59:27 PM PDT by
day10
(Rules cannot substitute for character.)
To: SmithL
Advocates: Voter ID ruling may disenfranchise US votersBut, it will definitely stop real voter fraud. But, then, why try to do some real good when a possibility of harm, however, remote exists.
Shakespeare said it best: "First let's kill all the lawyers."
4 posted on
04/28/2008 4:00:13 PM PDT by
E. Cartman
(Ronald Reagan's single biggest mistake: Picking Poppy Bush to be his veep.)
To: SmithL
6-3 is NOT “splintered.”
The Rats continued attempts to allow illegals and dead people to vote is what undermines our freedoms and liberty.
Its about time the SCOTUS put the hammer to this stuff.
5 posted on
04/28/2008 4:01:29 PM PDT by
OldMissileer
(Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
To: SmithL
Indeed. Asspress propaganda alert.
6 posted on
04/28/2008 4:01:48 PM PDT by
Luke21
To: SmithL
Across the country, as many as 20 million people lack such identification, most of them minorities and the elderly who don't have drivers' licenses or passports and are unable to afford the cost of obtaining documentation to apply for such identification, advocacy groups say. Then how on earth can they go down and vote in the first place???????????
To: SmithL
I say TS to those who do not have, and don't want to put in a minimum effort to get an ID.
And since there is no constitutional right to vote, I saw screw em.
9 posted on
04/28/2008 4:03:24 PM PDT by
Phantom Lord
(Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
To: SmithL
Why don’t the dims just set up a program to get legal voters ID? They drive them to the polls, why not drive them to get ID?
The answer of course is that dead people won’t be able to vote and living democrats won’t be able to vote for someone else or twice.
10 posted on
04/28/2008 4:03:59 PM PDT by
Soliton
To: SmithL
"Advocacy groups, including the Brennan Center, say they know of no voter fraud case ever being prosecuted against someone who impersonated another voter at the polls."Gosh, maybe because the Voter ID program is working the way its supposed to?
To: SmithL
6 to 3. That's 2 to 1. It's an overwhelming victory. Splintered? BS! Any President that won by that margin would be said to have an unprecedented mandate!
To: SmithL
Voter ID ruling may disenfranchise US voters the illegal and the dead.
17 posted on
04/28/2008 4:14:17 PM PDT by
tomkat
To: SmithL
18 posted on
04/28/2008 4:15:34 PM PDT by
dubie
To: SmithL
It’s about time ID was required to vote. Stop a lot of fraud.
19 posted on
04/28/2008 4:16:09 PM PDT by
yldstrk
(My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
To: SmithL
The writing style is breathtaking, isn't it?
>The Supreme Court's refusal to strike down an Indiana law requiring government-issued photo identification at the ballot box could disenfranchise minority and elderly voters at next week's primary and prompt other states to pass similar laws, voting advocates said Monday.
So....these are the 'advocates' of all voters? Exactly who, in a democracy, DOESN'T advocate voting? A very conspicuous absence of needed adjectives here!
The court, in a splintered 6-3 ruling Monday, said Indiana's law, which took effect in 2006 and requires voters to present a state or federal photo ID card at the ballot box, does not violate the First or 14th amendments. The court said the law served as a justifiable protection to the electoral process.
6-3 is a pretty wide margin on this Court with its reliable voting blocs.
To: SmithL
Right, just the way it “disenfranchises” them when they want to cash a check or get a library card or ...
21 posted on
04/28/2008 4:17:20 PM PDT by
Let's Roll
(As usual, following a shooting spree, libs want to take guns away from those who DIDN'T do it.)
To: SmithL
In Indiana, more than 20 percent of black voters do not have access to a valid photo IDThen how do they get their welfare checks cashed, apply for food stamps, or prove they're 21 to buy booze?
22 posted on
04/28/2008 4:19:41 PM PDT by
Gritty
(The GOP has no political warriors. None are willing to fight liberalism's premise.-Rush Limbaugh)
To: SmithL
Yeah, really. Some ‘splintered’ 6-3 ruling. Three of them said the Democrats were morons, the other three said they were fools, too.
It’s a solid ruling on a simple, straightforward basis.
To: SmithL
"The Supreme Court's refusal to strike down an Indiana law requiring government-issued photo identification at the ballot box could disenfranchise.....elderly voters ... They are so old that there are no photographs of them?
28 posted on
04/28/2008 4:25:47 PM PDT by
cookcounty
(Obama reach across the aisle? He's so far to the left, he'll need a roadmap to FIND the aisle.)
To: SmithL
"The Supreme Court's refusal to strike down an Indiana law requiring government-issued photo identification at the ballot box could disenfranchise.....elderly voters ... They are so old that there are no photographs of them?
29 posted on
04/28/2008 4:25:50 PM PDT by
cookcounty
(Obama reach across the aisle? He's so far to the left, he'll need a roadmap to FIND the aisle.)
To: SmithL
Fornicate you, Advocates, I'M TIRED OF THE CHEATERS YOU REPRESENT DISENFRANCHISING ME.
30 posted on
04/28/2008 4:25:59 PM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(Who Would Montgomery Brewster Choose?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson